Wow, you couldn't help yourself, could you?
Nothing is official until the LOI is signed. But somebody said one thing that wasn't even bad about the hawks, and you still saw your bat signal, and had to come running to be a ****.
As far as in-state recruiting, it's a down year. But, I have seen Hill play, and he is a hard worker. If he doesn't get hurt, he will maximize his talents because of his work ethic.
I have never been one to worry about in state kids anyways. I watched too many UNI recruits play for mac the mediocre so he could spin how many instate kids he had on the roster. At this point, we aren't going to beat iowa for most any instate kid. We need to make this a destination. But that happens with winning.
I agree that Mac did go overboard at times. And that ended up killing his depth. I'm sure that the goal is to beat iowa on every recruit that ISU wants, but I'd settle for 50/50 or even 40/60. In the end, there's usually only 3-4 players that both schools offer. The past 5 years, ISU has gotten pretty much none of those...even with offering earlier. Guys like Sash and Angerer, ISU offered well in advance of KF only to see them hold out for and accept the iowa offer. ISU needs to get some of those guys. It seems to me like they are on the way to doing that. They beat iowa for preferred walk-ons Boesen and Peters this year and Woody before that. Now they have Hill sticking with his commitment (so far at least) after iowa offered. We'll see if Rogers eventually gets an iowa offer or Malloy gets an ISU offer. I personally don't think that Seeley would go to iowa over ISU even if they offer.
To me, ISU has the more personable, player-friendly coach. As KF's tenure winds down, they're going to have to take advantage of that and win some of the battles.