Why was Godfrey Suspended?

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
10,643
9,576
113
Dubuque
I was a bit out of the loop when Godfrey was suspended, was there ever a reason stating why?

It's interesting that he was suspended for 3 games, while Railey only got 2 for OWI.
 
I was a bit out of the loop when Godfrey was suspended, was there ever a reason stating why?

It's interesting that he was suspended for 3 games, while Railey only got 2 for OWI.
He only got 2, but was clearly punished a lot more. He lost a lot of playing time in following games.
 
I was a bit out of the loop when Godfrey was suspended, was there ever a reason stating why?

It's interesting that he was suspended for 3 games, while Railey only got 2 for breaking curfew/breaking team rules

Railey has not been charged for anything yet.
 
Railey has not been charged for anything yet.
Thank you. We don't need to villify a freshman when there is clearly no evidence to do so. His bloodwork must have come back by now, so I suspect if he had been under alcoholic influence we would know by now.
 
Whatever he did, he said on Twitter yesterday that it would never happen again. Hopefully he learned his lesson.
 
I was kind of interested that Godfrey was allowed to be at the game yesterday and RAiley wasn't at the home game he was suspended for.

I have no idea, but I could see the possibility that after Railey, Hoiberg told the guys that they better walk the straight and narrow because the next guy to get into trouble was going get hit even harder.
 
I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that we have a bunch of transfers that are on a very short leash, and Hoiberg figures he needs to be consistent in punishment for everyone on the team. It hurts to have him out, but I think Fred is taking the right track on that.
 
Thank you. We don't need to villify a freshman when there is clearly no evidence to do so. His bloodwork must have come back by now, so I suspect if he had been under alcoholic influence we would know by now.

Ha! If DCI does it, good luck getting it before 2015.
 
Thank you. We don't need to villify a freshman when there is clearly no evidence to do so. His bloodwork must have come back by now, so I suspect if he had been under alcoholic influence we would know by now.

FYI Iowa has a zero tolerance policy for minors.
 
In terms of there is no .02 rule in Iowa. If you're a minor and you have any alcohol in your system its a DUI

You'd better tell Keokuk County Schools because they think Iowa has a .02 rule...

KCSTAAR - Summary of Iowa Alcohol Laws

EDIT: I'm finding a lot of references to a .02 BAC limit for minors in Iowa...

http://alcohollaws.org/iowaalcohollaws.html
http://www.ehow.com/facts_5465489_information-dui-charges-minors-iowa.html

Iowa's zero tolerance law means that minors who have a BAC at least .02 and less than .08 are guilty of DUI. They are not if less than .02.

http://www.iowadot.gov/owi.htm
 
Last edited: