Stats under Prohm

Cyclone06

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 11, 2006
4,034
2,765
113
Urbandale
So this can be summed up with, solid results taking over what was here already, but gotten worse the farther removed from the start. Damn. Yes I realize losing players to the draft early has really hurt, but that does not change the fact things have trended downward every year since the start.
 

MTCyclone43

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2016
932
1,507
93
Northwest Montana
Like everyone else, I've been unbelievably frustrated watching ISU basketball this season. I went back into the stats since Prohm took over Cyclone basketball to look at any trends. To keep everything as consistent as possible, I strictly looked at regular season conference play. I'm not a statistician by any means, but since I took the time to look at the data myself, figured I'd share it on here. Do with it how you'd like.

Conference Record:
2015-16: (10-8)
2016-17: (12-6)
2017-18: (4-14)
2018-19: (9-9)
2019-20: (3-8) **7 conference games remain

Home Record:
2015-16: (7-2)
2016-17: (7-2)
2017-18: (4-5)
2018-19: (5-4)
2019-20: (3-2) **4 home games remain

Average PPG:
2015-16: 80.4
2016-17: 78.2
2017-18: 73.2
2018-19: 73.8
2019-20: 65.9 **7 conference games remain

Average Pt Difference on Conference Wins (Losses)
2015-16: 10.2pts (5.75pts)
2016-17: 7pts (6.5pts)
2017-18: 13pts (12.4pts)
2018-19: 11.3pts (5pts)
2019-20: 10pts (15.75pts) **7 conference games remain

Biggest Win (Biggest Loss)
2015-16: 19pts (10pts)
2016-17: 16pts (13pts)
2017-18: 18pts (23pts)
2018-19: 25pts (17pts)
2019-20: 13pts (29 pts) **7 conference games remain

Double Digit Wins (Losses)
2015-16: 5 (1)
2016-17: 3 (2)
2017-18: 3 (8)
2018-19: 5 (2)
2019-20: 2 (6) **7 conference games remain

Wins by 15+ pts (losses by 15+ pts)
2015-16: 1 (0)
2016-17: 1 (0)
2017-18: 2 (6)
2018-19: 2 (2)
2019-20: 0 (4) **7 conference games remain

Record Against Conference Opponents:
Baylor: 2-8
Kansas: 3-6
K-State: 6-3
Oklahoma: 7-3
Oklahoma State: 7-2
TCU: 3-6
Texas: 3-6
Texas Tech: 5-4
West Virginia: 2-7
Overall: 38-45 (45.8%)
Certainly not getting it done in conference play.
 

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,189
27,213
113
Certainly not getting it done in conference play.
12-6, 9-9, and 8-9 isn't terrible when considering how good the conference was during those years. The two years we've had bad conference records are the two years we were also a bad team (This year, 17-18 season.)
 

isutrevman

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2007
7,372
9,952
113
38
Ames, IA
So this can be summed up with, solid results taking over what was here already, but gotten worse the farther removed from the start. Damn. Yes I realize losing players to the draft early has really hurt, but that does not change the fact things have trended downward every year since the start.

Last year never happened?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: isufbcurt

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,345
55,241
113
12-6, 9-9, and 8-9 isn't terrible when considering how good the conference was during those years. The two years we've had bad conference records are the two years we were also a bad team (This year, 17-18 season.)

I'm sure there's some sort of analytics that says the B12 was good last year, but I didn't think it was so good that the talent available at ISU couldn't do better.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyfanisu

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,189
27,213
113
I'm sure there's some sort of analytics that says the B12 was good last year, but I didn't think it was so good that the talent available at ISU couldn't do better.
Literally the only games I thought we for sure should've won was against TCU and @ WVU. The other home losses were against very solid teams, two of which shared the Big 12 Title, and one of those made the National Title. We beat both of those teams on the road too.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman

AuH2O

Well-Known Member
Sep 7, 2013
13,012
20,988
113
I'm sure there's some sort of analytics that says the B12 was good last year, but I didn't think it was so good that the talent available at ISU couldn't do better.
Per KenPom it has been the #1 conference every year Prohm has been here. Guessing that streak ends this year.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman

Cyfanisu

Active Member
Mar 31, 2019
103
157
43
51
Literally the only games I thought we for sure should've won was against TCU and @ WVU. The other home losses were against very solid teams, two of which shared the Big 12 Title, and one of those made the National Title. We beat both of those teams on the road too.
We should not lose that often at Hilton. I don’t care how good the opponent is.
 

Cycl1

Well-Known Member
Mar 14, 2012
8,506
1,890
113
38
North Liberty
Her are some stats under prohm.

Our 5th year senior Jacobson is shooting his worst 2 pt percentage and his worst 3 pt percentage of his entire career in conference play. He is also currently averaging his least points per game on conference play. As a freshman at Nebraska he shot better percentages and scored more points than he does as a 5th year senior.

Another 5th year senior, Nixon, is also shooting his worst overall percentage in conference play. His 2 pt percentage is actually a career high, but his 3 pt percentage is a staggering 0.171 which is waaaay worse than his next worse season of 0.298.

These are 5th year seniors. This is our senior leadership under prohm. These players started 19 of 22 conference games, and they have regressed.
 
  • Winner
  • Friendly
Reactions: CyBobby and JBone84

Halincandenza

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2018
9,434
10,262
113
Prohm is the only ISU coach in Ken Pom era to finish in the top 50 of Deff. twice and he has two of the top 5 seasons. No coach finished with a top 50 D eff season since Wayne Morgan's 05/05 team.

He has the top 2 offensive seasons in the Ken Pom era and 3 of the top 5.
He has the top two season of offense and defense combined when he finished 11th and 42nd one year and 9th and 47th another.
 

kentkel

Well-Known Member
Apr 12, 2006
5,408
5,630
113
57
I'm sure there's some sort of analytics that says the B12 was good last year, but I didn't think it was so good that the talent available at ISU couldn't do better.
I agree. And, actually, talent-wise, I contend that ISU had THE MOST talent of any team in the Big 12. To be clear, I really like Coach Prohm & have admired a LOT of what he has done. However, last year demonstrated some managerial problems (both in-game strategy as well as handling the roster). Then, these problems were compounded by Lard's inability to realize his potential. I honestly think that Prohm DID his best to integrate Lard & gave him MANY chances to succeed at ISU - it was just something that didn't work out, so I don't fault the coaches.

However, the lack of "cohesiveness" of that team & their inability to close out games is what really frustrated me. Perhaps no coach could have gotten those players to gel - but I suspect that THAT is NOT the case. CSP was NOT able to get these EXTREMELY talented guys to play together consistently (with maybe the exception of the conference tourney) & that left many of us with a bitter taste in our mouths when the season ended.
 

CyHans

Well-Known Member
Apr 28, 2010
912
915
93
That was a turnover trying to make something happen after letting the clock run down to under 10 seconds. They were trying to make a play to take the lead going into the half on the last shot of the half. I don't fault them for that. What was ****** up on that play was the guy who was supposed to receive that pass ran into his screener rather than running around him just as the pass was thrown where he should have been going. Anyone who blames that on the plan or the passer missed what actually happened.

There were plenty of other turnovers in that game to get mad at the player throwing it long before that one.

Also, you complain about turnovers saying they lost the game and then say that they guy who last I knew led the league in A/TO ratio wouldn't have made a difference in the game?
I still think the TO's/execution is bad on this team. What I meant by TH not making a difference is I think we still would have lost. We've seen this with this team several times this year. Play close the first half then struggle the second half. CW talks about it often on the radio.
 

madguy30

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 15, 2011
57,345
55,241
113
I agree. And, actually, talent-wise, I contend that ISU had THE MOST talent of any team in the Big 12. To be clear, I really like Coach Prohm & have admired a LOT of what he has done. However, last year demonstrated some managerial problems (both in-game strategy as well as handling the roster). Then, these problems were compounded by Lard's inability to realize his potential. I honestly think that Prohm DID his best to integrate Lard & gave him MANY chances to succeed at ISU - it was just something that didn't work out, so I don't fault the coaches.

However, the lack of "cohesiveness" of that team & their inability to close out games is what really frustrated me. Perhaps no coach could have gotten those players to gel - but I suspect that THAT is NOT the case. CSP was NOT able to get these EXTREMELY talented guys to play together consistently (with maybe the exception of the conference tourney) & that left many of us with a bitter taste in our mouths when the season ended.

I think we're in an era where being a college coach is a tough spot pretty consistently.
 

agcy68

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2007
2,551
784
113
78
Iowa
To me next year will be the bellweather year. Good class coming in with a returning core that should help continue growth. Without significant progress next year, the seat will be very warm.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman