**** the super league
1. We would be included
2. This isn’t a super league in reality.
3. What are the actual odds that this could even begin to get off the ground? None? 2%?
**** the super league
The schools will do it if they can make more money. The commissioners will fight it tooth and nail because it renders them useless.
Pollard predicted this exact thing fairly recently.
Brett’s tweet didn’t really show the full context. The proposal would actually include all current FBS teams, realigning conferences, allowing for two divisions (with the groundwork for promotion, but not relegation).
I don’t think there’s any chance the SEC or Big 10 schools will sign on for this. The commissioners and conference staff certainly won’t.
Brett’s tweet didn’t really show the full context. The proposal would actually include all current FBS teams, realigning conferences, allowing for two divisions (with the groundwork for promotion, but not relegation).
I don’t think there’s any chance the SEC or Big 10 schools will sign on for this. The commissioners and conference staff certainly won’t.
2% is being generous. There is almost zero reason the SEC or Big Ten would want to agree to this as it’s laid out1. We would be included
2. This isn’t a super league in reality.
3. What are the actual odds that this could even begin to get off the ground? None? 2%?
When that many people from that many different areas know there is no way to keep something secret but this is also an official press release.Why would this leak and who seeks to benefit/who is negatively impacted from this information getting out there?
Do you think there will be an “official statement” from any of the involved parties?When that many people from that many different areas know there is no way to keep something secret. Also it’s DOA regardless
Exactly.2% is being generous. There is almost zero reason the SEC or Big Ten would want to agree to this as it’s laid out
Thinking in terms of negotiation… is this potentially a play to set up a structured CFB landscape for everyone who’s not SEC/B1G?2% is being generous. There is almost zero reason the SEC or Big Ten would want to agree to this as it’s laid out
No idea because that idea of a structured landscape just isn’t really feasible.Thinking in terms of negotiation… is this potentially a play to set up a structured CFB landscape for everyone who’s not SEC/B1G?
I don’t see those two leagues agreeing to this either. Why split the pie more ways when you’ve got the largest pieces?
Absolutely not. It would be the financial death of every AD outside of the P2 and they know it. I assume this is a desperate last attempt for something equitable, but what it's trying to be doesn't matter because it's DOA.Thinking in terms of negotiation… is this potentially a play to set up a structured CFB landscape for everyone who’s not SEC/B1G?
I don’t see those two leagues agreeing to this either. Why split the pie more ways when you’ve got the largest pieces?
Yeah except it’s not and the other conferences being given multipule auto bids to future playoffs kinda disproves your point.Exactly.
The SEC and Big 10 want to eliminate or relegate the rest of the sport to another division. It's very odd, but it's absolutely childish "you can't play in my tree fort because I'm cooler than you" type of thinking.
Their end goal is to **** everyone else over simply because they can. At this point, it seems evident that their goal is to ruin the sport for everyone else.
I’m not sure the SEC/B1G can throw the match on the whole thing or there’d be lawsuits across the board. You’re right - engagement across the board is critical. It’d be foolish to blow up the whole thing.Yeah except it’s not and the other conferences being given multipule auto bids to future playoffs kinda disproves your point.
Do they want to remain the most powerful conferences while still keeping the fan bases of the others engaged in cfb, absolutely. But cutting off just reduces the marketplace
100% not, they want as much power and control as possible while still keeping the other leagues involved and invested.I’m not sure the SEC/B1G can throw the match on the whole thing or there’d be lawsuits across the board. You’re right - engagement across the board is critical. It’d be foolish to blow up the whole thing.
That said, I don’t think those leagues are doing things out of the goodness of their hearts (no conference is). Money talks.
Yep, the ideal solution.This isn’t a super league it’s a proposed league of 72, essentially just cutting out the G5.
I believe the reason is more $$$$.2% is being generous. There is almost zero reason the SEC or Big Ten would want to agree to this as it’s laid out
There's absolutely no way this would yield more money for the current SEC/B1G teams unless the other schools agreed to take teeny tiny pieces of the pie. I just don't see it.I believe the reason is more $$$$.
The NFL and NBA disagree. One of the catalysts to those entities exploding media dollars was negotiating as a whole entity with multiple media partners.There's absolutely no way this would yield more money for the current SEC/B1G teams unless the other schools agreed to take teeny tiny pieces of the pie. I just don't see it.