Guyssssssss we all know lunardi is a tool.
Almost 80% of bracket matrix has us as an 8/9.
I’m generally curious why Lunardi has us an 11 and then Palm and Sports Illustrated (using major media outlets) has us a 9. How is there a 2 line difference in their thinking?
It's hard to predict which metrics the committee will focus on. Is it wins, NET rankings, recent performance, or just an eye test. With our poor record but list of good wins, ISU is a tough one to place because it all depends on what the committee will look at.