***Official 2023 Transfer Thread***

Clonefan32

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2008
23,461
25,875
113
I think many are significantly overrating Sallis in this thread.

He may be worth a flyer with our 3rd scholarship but we are in on better players. He's very athletic and a good defender but was a pretty underwhelming offensive player. Oh and he literally played on the best offensive team in the country.

I think he'd be better off going somewhere like Nebraska where he is guaranteed 30 minutes a game. At Iowa State or Creighton I'm not sure his role would be much different than Gonzaga. Feels like a Tristan Enaruna type situation when he left KU as we are now two years removed from that 5 star recruiting label.

Enaruna is probably a good comp in terms of production. Over the 2 years he was there Gonzaga had Strawther, Hickman, Smith, Bolton, Nembhard, A real solid, veteran backcourt that I imagine was hard to crack into.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,121
7,725
113
Dubuque
Gotta stop being obsessed with the ”3s, 4s, 5s” etc. Apart from the pg this is mostly position-less basketball. We do not need to assign who is going to ”play the 5” nor do we need to have a 5 on the floor.
Position less basketball is a great concept, but the reality is taller players have advantages over shorter players at certain spots on the court and quicker players have advantages in other spots/situations.

So by using the 1-5 indicates physical or basketball skill-sets. Very few players are perfect and can do everything.

Sure Momcilovic can play on the perimeter and shoot 3 on offense all day long. But he doesn't have the quickness to guard small ball 3's. Not a criticism- I wouldn't want Tre King, Kunc, Ossuniyi, Ward or Jones to be the primary defender on a Rice, George, Gdick, OBannon, etc.

IMO being able to switch 1-5 is more coach speak vs reality. Good coaches and players excel when they get mismatches of posts(4/5) on guards (1-3).
 
  • Like
Reactions: isutrevman

Cyclonepride

Thought Police
Staff member
Apr 11, 2006
98,791
62,313
113
55
A pineapple under the sea
www.oldschoolradical.com
Position less basketball is a great concept, but the reality is a taller players have advantages over shorter players at certain spots on the court and quicker players have advantages.

So by using the 1-5 indicates physical or basketball skill-sets. Very few players are perfect and can do everything.

Sure Momcilovic can play on the perimeter and shoot 3 on offense all day long. But he doesn't have the quickness to guard small ball 3's. Not a criticism- I wouldn't want Tre King, Kunc, Ossuniyi, Ward or Jones to be the primary defender on a Rice, George, Gdick, OBannon, etc.

IMO being able to switch 1-5 is more coach speak vs reality. Good coaches and players excel when they get mismatches of posts(4/5) on guards (1-3).
Switching 1-5 doesn't mean that you won't have disadvantages at times when you do it. It just means that you have the capability of defending that mismatch well enough that your advantages outweigh your disadvantages overall.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclones125

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,896
8,378
113
Overland Park
Gotta stop being obsessed with the ”3s, 4s, 5s” etc. Apart from the pg this is mostly position-less basketball. We do not need to assign who is going to ”play the 5” nor do we need to have a 5 on the floor.
Not really, people use 1-5 now because it’s just different now. Most teams don’t use the traditional PG-SG-SF-PF-C that they used to. 1-5 covers that. Could be three guards and two forwards, four guards and a Center… and so on.

But yes, you can play the 5 without being a Center.
 

TheDudeAbides

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
90
140
33
Current dead period through noon, 4/6. Expect excitement, visits, and/or general carnage starting Thursday afternoon.
Honest question - what does the dead period even represent? There have already been multiple visits and commitments announced. Clearly there has been on-going communication with teams & players for quite some time.
 

Pat

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2011
2,400
3,536
113
Honest question - what does the dead period even represent? There have already been multiple visits and commitments announced. Clearly there has been on-going communication with teams & players for quite some time.

During the dead period, coaches may not have any in-person contact with recruits and/or their parents. But communication is still allowed to occur via phone, email and social media/other digital communication channels.

Current dead period started 3/30, so stuff happened before. Not to be cynical, but I’d also guess that some of these “commitments” were probably done before the season even ended.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron