Or you could start entirely over going into year 6....A cautionary tale for what can happen with a new coach.
You start entirely over.
Or you could start entirely over going into year 6....A cautionary tale for what can happen with a new coach.
You start entirely over.
Or you could start entirely over going into year 6....
idk man, I think he's pretty built to play now. His efficiency went up as his number stayed relatively the same while losing minutes. He is a solid player, unfortunately memphis is bringing in some dudes right now.I think Harris would benefit from a year out so i don’t mind if he doesn’t get a waiver.
idk man, I think he's pretty built to play now. His efficiency went up as his number stayed relatively the same while losing minutes. He is a solid player, unfortunately memphis is bringing in some dudes right now.
He'd be an immense help this year, imo. That being said, any player with the right mindset would benefit from a sit out year also.
Don't disagree, I'm of the belief a sit out year is always a help if the player is willing to buckle down and train/learn at 120%.I think the benefit would not be as much about skill development (as it is with most major improvements for sit outs), but rather, having a year to learn the PG decision tree from Prohm. He could then come in and run the show better / have a much higher APG and A:TO. How that impacts Walker's PT / progression is unknown.
Has anyone heard anything on Zach Bryant from UAB since he entered the portal?
Someone rated Ozier as better than Harris? Yikes(to that dudes opinion, not to Harris. Still happy to have him)Also of the 6 sit outs in his top 48, we have been connected with 3 still available
Brown (8)
Walker (26)
Flowers(34)
Ozier (36)
Perez (39)
*Harris (43)
Yeah a less efficient player at a lower level? Makes no sense.Someone rated Ozier as better than Harris? Yikes(to that dudes opinion, not to Harris. Still happy to have him)
Only guess is that he's taking into account that Ozier has 3 years left and could develop? Still not enough to convince me that he should be above Harris thoughYeah a less efficient player at a lower level? Makes no sense.
Harris has 2 right?Only guess is that he's taking into account that Ozier has 3 years left and could develop? Still not enough to convince me that he should be above Harris though
Not sure. If so then the ranking makes even less senseHarris has 2 right?