You could make a case for those guys. Personally I think that's overrating Horford just a little but whatever. The difference is that none of those other guys save Davis are just now entering the prime of their careers. Cousins is a 25 year old coming off a season where he averaged 24 and 12. With the right head coach and support system, he can be a franchise cornerstone. And as an added bonus, he's already locked in for the next three years. There are teams in the league that could take on him and his personality and build a winning team around him. Just my two cents.
well yeah these are all opinions, I may end up being proven wrong.
I'd like to know what trades you think would get a team a title with Cousins. Sure, I could buy that Golden State or Cleveland could win a title with him if you just took their current roster (minus the center he's replacing) and added him to it.
But who could make a legitimate offer for him and still have a team capable of challenging for a title? I get why the Lakers and Celtics are after him, they don't have that many quality pieces to begin with so they've got nothing to lose.
Going through the current playoff teams:
Golden State: would you give up Klay, Bogut and a first round pick for him?
New Orleans: they're not trading Davis and they don't have anyone else Sacremento would want
Portland: Aldridge is a FA so the money difference would require a significant sweetener and even if it didn't is Portland really a better team with Cousins rather than Aldridge?
Clippers: Sacremento is going to want more than Deandre and a first rounder, and I don't know what else LA could give up besides Paul or Blake to even make them think about trading Cousins.
Houston: Dwight is better anyway, but Houston couldn't afford to trade Dwight's defense for Cousins' offense given the rest of their roster.
Dallas: clearly would make them much better, but they don't really have anyone Sacramento would want.
Memphis: already has the best center in the league
Atlanta: would trading Horford for Cousins have made Atlanta better given Atlanta's playing style?
Brooklyn: don't see a trade that would make sense given the contracts that most of Brooklyn's team has.
Toronto: Does Lowry, Amir Johnson, and a first round pick get the deal done? If so, does that make them better?
Washington: would probably have to part with either Wall or Beal, along with Gortat. Don't think that makes them better.
Chicago: would have to give up at least Butler and Noah along with either Mirotic or Gibson. Maybe the most intriguing what if as the lineup would basically be Rose, Mirotic/Gibson, Cousins, and two wings. That's basically betting on Rose's health.
Milwaukee: they could probably get a deal done by giving up the #1 pick and Jabari.
Cleveland: does a Love sign and trade work if they include Mosgov? That could be interesting.
Boston: They'd have to give up Smart and all of their valuable Nets picks. Does Isaiah Thomas and Cousins make boston an elite team? It certainly didn't make Sacramento an elite team.
As a bonus since you're a pacers fan, you trading Cousins for Paul George?