I mean.... If we keep Jefferson. We got Buchanan.There goes "The Presidents!"
WE ARE SO BACK!!!!
I mean.... If we keep Jefferson. We got Buchanan.There goes "The Presidents!"
Cocaine, Boobs and $$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Wasn’t Pitino already doing that about 10 years ago?the 3 GOATs of the NIL era?
truly a visionary ahead of his time.Wasn’t Pitino already doing that about 10 years ago?
Isn't the real difference between the NIL "system" and professional sports that the players have a union which negotiates compensation? It's not as simple as Make them all sign contracts!
About 170 posts from now got to get 1000 posts.Are we at a point where we can ban the OP now?
Which is why if the NCAA had any vision at all, they'd have worked with the players on setting one up 20 years ago when that kid from NW sued them.Pretty sure a union might actually hurt the players at this point. It's the wild west and they are getting whatever they want. If they have to deal with a union, that gives the NCAA and Universities rights to negotiate rules with it. Which could hurt the players.
Agreed. I don't see a whole lot of incentive for a 5 star high school player to join a union. It's why I don't think the landscape is going to change much, going forward. They can't force a union on the players. And without one there's no CBA. And without a CBA, the restrictions that the schools would like to enforce are illegal.Pretty sure a union might actually hurt the players at this point. It's the wild west and they are getting whatever they want. If they have to deal with a union, that gives the NCAA and Universities rights to negotiate rules with it. Which could hurt the players.
It's funny to me you label this current situation built on donations to 501c's as capitalism at its finest. I think many of us that supported paying the players expected their pay to come out of revenue like a normal capitalist system, not charity donations.
You can lament that.... but I really hate to tell you this.Thanks for posting this. This is exactly the problem. It made sense for players to get some of the TV and other revenue and to do commercials, sell stuff, etc. to make money. It makes no sense for schools to rely on donations from fans to pay players
And not for you, but in general calling We Will or other programs a charity is disgraceful. Paying players is not charity work.
I said its selfish to assume that other people will donate but you don't have to, not that its selfish to not donate. No one is saying donate money that you don't have.
But to tell people to not donate and that their donations have no impact is absurd. Of course they do. I have no idea why someone who claims to be an ISU fan is telling people to not donate to WeWill.
Even if you hate NIL and won't or cannot afford to donate a penny (then don't complain when people steal our players or we don't land transfers), it makes no sense to openly discourage other people from donating if you want ISU to be as successful as possible. Holy cow...
Unfortunately, becoming employees of the universities without them first being given an antitrust exemption to allow them to collectively bargain the defined boundaries for contracts would be an even worse situation than we currently have.The NCAA's own policies prevent that. Definitely within their power to offer contracts. That's been a line that they have been unwilling to cross, thus far.
Just like pro sports, the top guys are hurt by having the structures of the leagues financials (salary caps, maxes, restrictions on FA) and the bottom guys benefit (league minimums, veteran minimums). In pro sports where there are salary caps, luxury taxes and the NBA max deals there would absolutely be teams willing to blow past those for the very top guys. Conversely there would absolutely be guys undercutting the current minimums, esp veteran mins to play in the leagues.Agreed. I don't see a whole lot of incentive for a 5 star high school player to join a union. It's why I don't think the landscape is going to change much, going forward. They can't force a union on the players. And without one there's no CBA. And without a CBA, the restrictions that the schools would like to enforce are illegal.
At the same time, for all of the chicken little-ism going on, bemoaning the death of college athletics, we're still seeing high consumption of the product. The games this weekend had the highest ratings since 2017. A credible argument can be made that there really isn't a problem.
That is just a work around. Call it whatever you want. The players do give back to the communities and surrounding areas they live in. Players deserve to be paid just like the rest of adults and they have been getting screwed for decades.Thanks for posting this. This is exactly the problem. It made sense for players to get some of the TV and other revenue and to do commercials, sell stuff, etc. to make money. It makes no sense for schools to rely on donations from fans to pay players
And not for you, but in general calling We Will or other programs a charity is disgraceful. Paying players is not charity work.
I agree to most of that, there was always of course a lot of money involved and players being paid. And maybe it's just me but the visibility of asking fans to donate seems new and of course the big change is players moving from school to school. I think long term there will be changes.You can lament that.... but I really hate to tell you this.
Its the reality of modern college athletics and the train is off the tracks. So it never getting put back on those tracks. People can either adapt to that, or go watch the NBA/NFL because thats effectively where college athletics is at. We are a minor league/development feeder for the pro leagues and that comes with a cost.
TBH it always was that. Now the mask is off is really all thats changed. Cant hide from the billion $ business anymore.
Agree they deserved to get paidThat is just a work around. Call it whatever you want. The players do give back to the communities and surrounding areas they live in. Players deserve to be paid just like the rest of adults and they have been getting screwed for decades.
Not that crazy. A bunch of marketing VIPs at companies learning more about how NIL can help their businesses.
I can completely sympathize with you. Trust me. I have been very outspoken against crowd funding rosters. I dont think it actually addresses the core issue. College athletics is a billion $ industry and the people making that money are not financially responsible for the people who are earning them that money. Crowd funded rosters just pushes the hurt down to the people watching the sport who now are paying twice for quality TV. That sucks. So from my perspective I get it. I do donate to We Will. But I get what you are saying.I agree to most of that, there was always of course a lot of money involved and players being paid. And maybe it's just me but the visibility of asking fans to donate seems new and of course the big change is players moving from school to school. I think long term there will be changes.
And honsetly do not care what others choose to do, just putting my support with anyone that thinks there should not be pressure to donate. For now I'll continue to chear on ISU and hope things don't get worse before the next changes happen