Jeff Beverly
- Thread starter peteypie
- Start date
If Baab is starting at the 4 we have some serious problems
I think he's ours if we want him and we set that date knowing Juiston will announce by then. Just my opinion
IMO, he plays like Niang and Fizer had a kid. Not a great jumper, but has that fall away shot down, gets stuff off in traffic. Plus, he can hit the three, if left wide open. We need some mismatch guys, glue guys that hold the offense together. Coach must see something.
Isn't that what we get with Juiston? More upside in that he's bigger and hopefully more impactful as a starter
any chance he's being recruited as a walk-on that would back up Juiston, but get a scholarship if we don't fill up?
Reason I ask with four to fill including Shayok we still need a grad transfer wing.
That gives us two spots for forwards and I'm not sure he'd start even if we don't get anyone else.
Reason I ask with four to fill including Shayok we still need a grad transfer wing.
That gives us two spots for forwards and I'm not sure he'd start even if we don't get anyone else.
Last edited:
Even if 4 guards is your best lineup, it's often better to start two big guys. Reason being you want your four guard lineup to be on the court after the other team has started substituting. Big guys tire quickly, and you can usually play your 4 guard lineups a lot against their backups who aren't as capable of taking advantage against a smaller guy.
There's still 3 spots to fill, long ways to go.
Let's just say, if Prohm has to decide between Beverly and Marrow for the final scholarship, then that's a very good problem to have.
As it is, if either Brown or Juiston don't commit, then there's likely an invitation to Beverly.
demoncore1031
Well-Known Member
Hmm, I saw UTSA in their bowl game this year. I wonder if Beverly saw the field at alll.
I wonder if they'd take Juiston and Beverly should Brown decide to stay west.
I also think Morrow will be a steal if we can get him.
I also think Morrow will be a steal if we can get him.
Why is it so hard to understand that ALL teams recruit more players than scholarships they have. He's a fall back in case we don't get Juiston.
That's not my point. I don't see him as a starter even if we don't sign anyone else. That's why I question the possible scenario he's a walk-on unless we have an opening. Plus the other schools are NM and texts st. Having Texas st in the same list as us also raises the question. We don't have to agree on everything just raising the possibility.
I think people are getting a little too hung up on his 3 point shooting at UTSA. At TA&MCC he shot over 40% (.413) on a limited number of attempts (46 or 1.4 a game in less than 20 minutes a game). I don't expect he would shoot 40% in the Big 12, but I don't expect that he would shoot in the low 20's either since he wouldn't be asked to carry the load by any stretch of the imagination. If he could hit a third of his shots from 3 that would be enough to keep defenders honest and open up driving, passing and offensive rebounding opportunities.
Halsted has said Beverly will be a Cyclone basically if Iowa State allows him to be.
He looks like a guy that could be the 2nd or 3rd guy off the bench. You put him in, let him get a couple of shots up and roll with him if he has a hot hand. If not, it's the bench for the rest of the game.
Hard to say at this point. He could flourish with better coaching and better players around him.
Not knocking the kid, but he doesn't excite me. We should be able to do better than this.
