Or play for mess.
Who else thinks Todd Sturdy had some influence on the Tulsa game plan last week?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or play for mess.
Here's another interesting Sam Richardson fact...he has never won at Jack Trice. I like stats.
Who else thinks Todd Sturdy had some influence on the Tulsa game plan last week?
You guys do realize that Arnaud was a pretty decent QB. The problem was that he was a pro-style QB being forced to play in a spread system and 3 different OC's. He wasn't built to play a spread offense. No speed or illusiveness. Very strong arm but made to play in a system he wasn't built for.
This seems to be a theme on offense. Our offense would be much better if the COACHES adjusted to the players/talent that they have.
Example: Throwing a WR screen 35 yards across the field to a receiver that is standing still when your QB doesn't have a cannon. It takes too long for the ball to get there, D is playing man coverage, ball thrown to a WR that doesn't have big play speed = 2 yard loss to 2 yard gain at best.
Example: Throwing inside WR screens to a 5'5" WR when the D is blitzing the middle = no chance for success (Iowa 4th & 4)
Example: Running Woody to the outside on a sweep play = fail
I guess my point is you can't force players to do things they aren't able to do. Coaches need to adapt to the players' strengths.
After a couple decent games this year, SR is on pace for just over 3000 yards passing. If he pulls it off, it would be the first time since some guy named Seneca did it. In fact, ISU has not had 3000 as a team since 2002.
No. Lazard is already the best receiver and he's still a HS senior. Our receiver group is filled with role players but not a single true star receiver.This just crossed my mind. Assuming Lazard stays commited to ISU, what are the chances of him redshirting? We return Jarvis (will be a SR next year), Ecby and Bundrage who are both having solid Soph. campaigns, we will have Montgomery who could be a huge piece to this offense. We will have Daley and PJ Harris, who are both very young and have some potential. We only lose Albert Gary this year. I know this is a long time from now, but we will have solid depth with or without Lazard in the lineup.
You guys do realize that Arnaud was a pretty decent QB. The problem was that he was a pro-style QB being forced to play in a spread system and 3 different OC's. He wasn't built to play a spread offense. No speed or illusiveness. Very strong arm but made to play in a system he wasn't built for.
This seems to be a theme on offense. Our offense would be much better if the COACHES adjusted to the players/talent that they have.
Example: Throwing a WR screen 35 yards across the field to a receiver that is standing still when your QB doesn't have a cannon. It takes too long for the ball to get there, D is playing man coverage, ball thrown to a WR that doesn't have big play speed = 2 yard loss to 2 yard gain at best.
Example: Throwing inside WR screens to a 5'5" WR when the D is blitzing the middle = no chance for success (Iowa 4th & 4)
Example: Running Woody to the outside on a sweep play = fail
I guess my point is you can't force players to do things they aren't able to do. Coaches need to adapt to the players' strengths.