our rule is Ask and you will receive.
That is what draws me to his manhood ... his manliness. His ability to be my hero... when I need one.
Dear God, I hope you don't bring kids into this world.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
our rule is Ask and you will receive.
That is what draws me to his manhood ... his manliness. His ability to be my hero... when I need one.
an occasional swat is okay for some children ... how is that out of context?
-keep
As long as you don't believe the studies, anyway.
My assertion is maybe it does harm them long-term, maybe it doesn't, but since there are other ways that are proven to work, why risk it?
To spanking advocates, I ask...
Why is spanking your method of choice? Does it work? Does it work better than nonviolent methods? Why do some kids whose parents don't spank at all turn out just fine?
Actually my wife has done countless studies and reading on the subject for her masters. I also don't necessarily think it's a violent act if the person who is administering the punishment is under control and not angry.
Your first quote made it look like you were quoting Dr. Sears. The quotes were what a fictional parent was saying.
So, you're OK gambling on whether your child is the one that will not be affected by spanking?
Why not find a way that works that's not using aggression?
You say you have only done it once...why did you find a non-aggressive way the other 1000 times?
What do her studies conclude?
What message is being sent to the child, even if the punisher is under control?
think about how many things we gamble our kids health and safety with... think about that.
walking to school, getting a vaccination, playing sports, driving a car, skateboarding, roller coasters ........ some of those could be considered violent or aggressive.
Since I know my kid best, and she knows me best (talk to me in 5 years about boy... could be a whole nudda lebel) ...our parenting has worked out very well for what we have done, when. I will respect a parent knowing their kid best and how best to deal with disciplinary actions... outside of hitting (>spanking) or other forms of abuse
I was quoting him.. and he said it can be okay for some, in a non-voilent form.
No one in this thread has stated why, if other methods obviously work, because they only have to spank once in a while, that they can't do those methods all of the time.
KnivesIt's every parent's prerogative, but it is not needed.
Use your head, not your hands. It's really that simple. There's nothing my kids can throw at me that I can't handle with my brain.
Most definitely. I would always immediately scheme a way to minimalize the punishment, because I knew it was comingI also remember when I got in trouble in school, I was scared to death to go home and tell mom and dad. Because I was going to get in more trouble at home.
This is trueThis thread is ridiculous. Every person/child is different. The same corrective action isn't always going to work for everyone. It's up to the parent/teacher/guardian/caretaker to determine what works best. No one method is the answer.
This is funny.Knives
I would say to the main dissenter here, if there are so many other great methods, what are they? I am not trying to be a smart *** I really want to know. However, I know parents who have abused and harmed their children a whole bunch without ever touching them.
Another question: What do spankers do when their kids are 13?
By the time they are thirteen they should have developed respect and the ability to determine right from wrong. Also when they are thirteen there are a lot more things one can do, such as take away social events or other things.
Disagree here. If you think the majority of thirteen year olds aren't going to disrespect their parents and can determine right from wrong with consistency, then you're just plain wrong. Also, there are plenty of things I can withhold from my kids (8 and 5) that help shape behavior. Not being able to go outside when they want to is equivalent to not being able to attend a social event to them.
I think that spanking is OK in moderation and under the correct circumstances.
I respect that, but challenge parents to use other methods.
I realize that maybe those parents do not do the correct things,
Right on about this.
How did anyone ever raise children without books? I will ask you this on the 1-2-3 method. What is the threat? So you endorse threatening your child but with really no intention carry that out.
Would you say that kids today are more respectful and better behaved than they were 20 or 30 years ago when physical consequences were prevelant because I would sure as hell say they aren't. Young kids today are a nuisance. They don't have respect for people like they should. I am speaking in general here and I am not saying all kids lack respect, but a lot do. I just don't know that those of you that say spanking is totally wrong have the right to tell some how to raise a child. Remember, this is not "beating" it is spanking. I know that I was spanked when little, but my parents were able to do way more damage mentally and I think if your not careful the damage may be worse without spanking.
Thirteen year olds can distinguish right from wrong for the most part. It is a matter of whether they care or not. What I am saying is that by the age of 13, I believe that behavior has already been shaped. Also by that age there are so many more things to take away. As far as your 5 and 8 year old, I don't feel that keeping kids inside is a great punishment. I know that I was sent outside with specific tasks to complete that I maybe didn't want to. Don't get me wrong here, I don't think spanking is just something you do routinely, but I do think it is effective in situations, and I don't think "spanking" has long term negative effects