Maybe he wasn't as big of a problem as they thought at Iowa? I'm thinking their offensive woes start at the top there.
Fire Mouser
- Thread starter KCyclone2010
- Start date
Don’t fire him, but do make certain that he spends a significant amount of time off season under-studying one of the top NFL OCs to better learn how he can help the team win!! I was hoping that would have happened last off season after we witnessed the weaknesses in his first season. He is also our TE coach (and a good one), is a loyal long term coach and with investing in as the OC to help him and the team get better in the future!
The creativity is there. That play that Rocco ran for the first down was sic.
I do think not having alpha WRs this year is a big setback.
2nd most drops in the conference is gonna make most OCs look worse than they are. But maybe you run the ball even more
Think it takes away a lot of the playbook with so many drops.
But that said he certainly can learn and grow too
Last edited:
Play calls look great when blocks are made, backs hit the hole, QB has time, receivers run the route, passes are accurate, catches are made, and the defenders don't make a great play.
And yes, sometimes the play called isn't what's needed for that situation.
Too often this season, at least one of those things didn't go as hoped for.
And yes, sometimes the play called isn't what's needed for that situation.
Too often this season, at least one of those things didn't go as hoped for.
He doesn’t, he just wants to fire Campbell. That’s his whole schtick.
Recruiting rankings
#36 2019 #41 2020 #46 2021 #37 2022 #47 2023 #47 2024 #49 2025 #52 2026
The trend does not look good. A good defensive staff is making good players out of poor recruits. I wonder if throwing and catching has the same learning curve as the other positions? Some offensive players just don't improve over time. Is that from poor coaching? poor learning? injury avoidance? We clearly have fewer offensive injuries the last few years.
#36 2019 #41 2020 #46 2021 #37 2022 #47 2023 #47 2024 #49 2025 #52 2026
The trend does not look good. A good defensive staff is making good players out of poor recruits. I wonder if throwing and catching has the same learning curve as the other positions? Some offensive players just don't improve over time. Is that from poor coaching? poor learning? injury avoidance? We clearly have fewer offensive injuries the last few years.
Sowell had 6 drops his first year at ECU and 7 his second year
He caught 46 year 1 and 34 catches year 2.
That seems like a high drop to catch ratio but maybe it's average
Second half points this season:
KSU: 17
Iowa: 3
Ark St: 7
Arizona: 17
Cincy: 15
Colorado: 7
BYU: 3
Arizona State: 3
TCU: 7
The lack of adjustments is still a major concern. The offense was not good yesterday, but they still won. Which is great. But the offensive performance yesterday was not one that is going to win you games very often. It was more of the same game we’ve watched them play for the last 3 games and really what we’ve seen for most of the season. It shouldn’t be controversial to say that the offense still has issues.
KSU: 17
Iowa: 3
Ark St: 7
Arizona: 17
Cincy: 15
Colorado: 7
BYU: 3
Arizona State: 3
TCU: 7
The lack of adjustments is still a major concern. The offense was not good yesterday, but they still won. Which is great. But the offensive performance yesterday was not one that is going to win you games very often. It was more of the same game we’ve watched them play for the last 3 games and really what we’ve seen for most of the season. It shouldn’t be controversial to say that the offense still has issues.
It’s not the play calling, it’s the lack of execution and crucial penalties.
Last I heard, we were second in the conference in dropped passes. Plus, Rocco isn’t throwing well. Dumb penalties taking away big gains. None of that is playcalling.
My macro economics professor taught me the by far the most valuable lesson I learned in college, about “causality fallacy”. Some of you folks are beating that drum to death.
The fact that we don’t have an identity when we have 2 backs that can legit run for 150+ ypg is the exact problem. Mouser wants us to be this cutesy play design, QB driven offense but our QB sucks right now and our receivers cannot consistently catch. Why continue to throw when we can run the ball?
We threw 8 passes the entire second half, let that be our identity and sprinkle in some throws when needed.
ISU scored two TDs in the 4th quarter.
It was like, how they got more points and stuff.
Maybe I don't remember correctly, but weren't most of us singing Mouser's praises last year when we won 11 games? There's an old saying, "Be careful what you wish for."
Mouser needs to quit dropping passes. He is probably injuring players too!
Whoever the second stringer is *******, I assume it’s moberly because he’s older
Moberly is third string. But go off.
Probably should know that before calling someone an *******.
Watching Higgins today and wish those hands could have been passed down to other players on the team
They are fly paper
They are fly paper
Latest posts
-
Chicago Bears bought Arlington Heights track only to build in Indiana?
- Latest: CloneFanInKC
-
-
-
-