Evaluating position groups this year vs. last year

Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

We didn't run White enough last year. Fix that and you fix the run game which in turn helps the pass.
 
Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

I try to be optimistic, but this season has me nervous. Defensively, I like the backfield, but the rest of the defense is a huge question mark IMO. Offensively, I like the RB and TE situation. I think it's too early to say we are going to see a lot of improvement at QB. I'm sure there will be some, but there needs to be a LOT to even be middle of the pack in the Big 12. WR is a big question mark. And if it wasn't for the new O-line coach, I wouldn't have much hope for marked improvement from that group. This team needs to score a lot more points than last season. I'm not saying it won't happen, but at best I'm cautiously optimistic.
 
Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

I'm very excited for Aaron Wimberly next season. How do you think the carries are going to be given next year at RB?

I hope to see him get a minimum 5 touches per game. James White will likely be the "feature" back, but i see 3-4 guys getting 6 to 10 carries. But honestly hopefully this year the coaching staff keeps running whoever is running the best instead of having two 8-9 yard carries followed by putting in another back. That frustrates me.
 
Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

DL & LB corps are going to be the weak link based on youth/experience. Concern is teams controlling the clock via running the ball down our throats.

Late in the fall, responding to a call-in show question, CPR said in 2013 the Clones will again have a 12-man rotation on the front four, regardless of youth.

I hope, unlike in the past when so often rookies were forced to play for prolonged lengths in games, this rotation might help us, at least a bit. Rotate in fresh legs, coach up the returning kid on the sidelines, rotate in fresh legs, coach up the returning kid on the sidelines, rotate. . . .
 
Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

Offense-

QB- I see a good chance for this group to be improved over last year. Granted, we are young, but I think both Richardson and Rohach are more accurate passers than Jantz and Barnett were. Give me a guy that can complete passes anyday over someone that's only good at scrambling and running.

RB- I also think this group will be better than last year. Yes, we probably won't have Shontrelle, but another year under James White, Jeff Woody, and Devondrick Nealy's belts will all make them better, and I think Wimberly will help us a lot too. And the Pistol will also help the run game IMO.

WR- This group, IMO, will be about the same as last year. Yes, we are young and inexperienced, but I think these young guys also will bring some added size to this group that could offset their lack of experience. So although it hurts to lose some of the guys from last year, I see big potential from Bundrage, Daley, Quan West, Ecby, PJ Harris, etc.

TE- This could really be a special group. Anytime you can put Brun and Bibbs on the field together, that spells trouble for the opposition IMO.

OL- This is a mystery to me. Someone with more knowledge of the O-line might be able to help me here. I think it could be improved just based on the fact we have some guys returning and hopefully Dika is back too.... along with a new and hopefully improved OL coach too. If this group can be improved over last year, I think the offense can put up some points.


Defense-

DE- I don't see much improvement here. Willie Scott and David Irving don't get me all that excited. Neither guy has shown much in terms of getting pressure on the QB. Scott is undersized, and Irving seems slow off the ball and still has a lot to learn. Hopefully Cory Morrissey and Nick Kron are improved this year?

DT- Big drop off here from last year IMO. McDonough and Laing were beasts. Going into spring, we have a RS freshmen (Bevins) and Jensen listed as starters. I'm sorry, but that is a big drop off folks. Nothing against Bevins because I think he could end up being an All Big 12 performer before he's done here, but he's just so young right now. Krick and Aka also have no experience really either. Walter Woods is ok, but hasn't shown much impact.

LB- As big of a drop off as DT or more IMO. Lose 2 of the best ISU LBs ever and replace them with mostly inexperienced youngsters. Rhoads said last week that this is probably our thinnest group on the team right now. Kinda scary.

Safety- This actually could be the strongest position group on the team. Led by Washington and Broomfield, they will be very solid. Mutcherson sounds like he's a stud as well. Cliff Stokes has also been moved here, and he played quite a bit last year at CB for us, so he's experienced as well.

CB- I also think this group could be improved over last year as well. Jansen Watson is really good and guys like Sam Richarson, Damien Lawry, and Charlie Rodgers all look really good too IMO.


I think it's obvious from this assessment that our success could very well depend on our front 7 on defense, the OL, the young WR's, and of course the QB, which is always the most important every year. I feel good about our RB's, TE's, Safeties, and Cornerbacks.

I think we'll do ok against the pass, as long as the opposing QB doesn't have all day to throw it. I worry about our rush defense immensely though. Tulsa ran all over us and were more physical, and that was with McDonough and Laing in there. We will be worse up front this year IMO. That's just scary to even think about.

I think 2014 could be a good year, but I see next year as kinda rough going for the defense especially. Thoughts?

My theory on the linebacker situation is we played without Jake for the last 5 games, enough time to find out what we had. I dont think we will be any worse off than we were the last 5 games of the season. Also everything I have heard about the DT position is that Aka and Cousins are more athletic and bigger than McDonough and Laing, just dont have the experience yet. Bring in the dark horse Coe, who I think will be a matchup nightmare for any center or guard with his speed and I think we should be at least even with last season.
 
Last edited:
Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

My theory on the linebacker situation is we played without Jake for the last 5 games, enough time to find out what we had. I dont think we will be any worse off than we were the last 5 games of the season.

We still had the 2011 big 12 defensive POY
 
Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

I am excited to see how each position group will be compared to the rest of the Big 12, vs our team last year.

Hopefully we can start closing the gap in a lot of areas.
 
Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

We still had the 2011 big 12 defensive POY

We could have the 2013 defensive POY coming back at linebacker this season. Since Rhoads has been here he has turned kids like Jesse Smith and Jake Knott into all Big 12 players, I see no reason why he cant do it with kids that have more talent starting out.
 
Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

I don't think we will be able to rely on our defense as much if our offense lays several eggs over a game.

Are you a farmer? You don't know anything about eggs. This is nothing more than blind speculation.
 
As dumb as this analysis is going to sound, as long as we score more points than our opponent we will be just fine. Meaning, our defense will be not near as good as last year but our offense WILL be better than last year. As long as our increase in offense is greater than our decrease in defense I see a similar result as last year.
 
Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

We could have the 2013 defensive POY coming back at linebacker this season. Since Rhoads has been here he has turned kids like Jesse Smith and Jake Knott into all Big 12 players, I see no reason why he cant do it with kids that have more talent starting out.

Sounds nice and all, but there certainly hasn't been anything that indicates our current LBs are more talented than Knott? He and Klein looked pretty darned athletic and good as true freshman. Knott had a ton of talent starting out with his combo of size and speed.
 
Re: Evaluatiing position groups this year vs. last year

Sounds nice and all, but there certainly hasn't been anything that indicates our current LBs are more talented than Knott? He and Klein looked pretty darned athletic and good as true freshman. Knott had a ton of talent starting out with his combo of size and speed.

Alton Meeks is a guy who is already 6'2 235 and is listed as a 4.7 40. He seems to be a pretty heady guy as well. You can only assume he has the intangibles to be a very good LB. Maybe not initially, but i don't see why he can't (unless he doesn't study film like Knott) but as good as Jake Knott was as a freshman.
 
I remember it was impossible to replace Jesse Smith everyone thought. Same logic is being used with Knott and Klein. A lot more true in this case, but I think we will just keep churning out LB's on defense, Wally is good at this!
 
Offense improves thanks to better o line philosophies which leads to a better run game and more time for richardson in the pocket. Richardson more experience at qb. I see no way the defense improves with all we lost imo
 
Defense might not improve, but it doesn't really need to. It might be young, but it's still bigger, faster, and stronger. There won't be that big of a drop off.
 
Jevohn Miller is the guy who concerns me. Coaches and players sounded high on him when we recognized that Knott would be out, but he just didn't seem ready when he got his shot at LB last year. Maybe it all just happened too fast for him (though he more than anyone should have been aware of Knott's impending surgery and getting ready to play). Or maybe he played out of position in order to keep Jeremiah George in the middle. It did seem a bit disjointed toward the end of the season with Klein playing different positions. Hope Miller steps up this year and shows that he learned from watching and practicing with Knott and Klein.
 
Offense improves thanks to better o line philosophies which leads to a better run game and more time for richardson in the pocket. Richardson more experience at qb. I see no way the defense improves with all we lost imo

Improved OL means improved running attack in turn improves the offense which helps the defense.