That's the point.I legitimately have no idea what your point is.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's the point.I legitimately have no idea what your point is.
The penalty is too severe, and the rules aren't evenly applied within the game or across the tournament.
Like I said, the penalty is too severe for a clearly unintentional foul.How is this any different than any other sport like basketball? Different crews are going to call games differently. Crews aren’t always going to be consistent. That’s officiating and that’s sports.
I didn't like the red there, and really, I just generally don't like adding/reviewing penalties via slo-mo in most sports. The same event looked very different in slo-mo than it did in real time. Similar things happen in targeting reviews for football, for example. I would've been fine with a yellow on Balogun for this particular incident as it was a pretty rough play, but I don't really think either player is especially at fault. It's just a function of how the sport and how officiating works. It's all human interpretation.Show that Balogun was intentionally trying to rake his cleats down the other player's calf and step on his turned ankle.
Like I said, the penalty is too severe for a clearly unintentional foul.
It's been clarified and there isn't a chance for appeal. It's automatic.I didn't like the red there, and really, I just generally don't like adding/reviewing penalties via slo-mo in most sports. The same event looked very different in slo-mo than it did in real time. Similar things happen in targeting reviews for football, for example. I would've been fine with a yellow on Balogun for this particular incident as it was a pretty rough play, but I don't really think either player is especially at fault. It's just a function of how the sport and how officiating works. It's all human interpretation.
I would expect the US to appeal it today to try to get him eligible for the next game, IIRC, they are empowered to try that.
Well ****, that's too bad. Next up, I guess.It's been clarified and there isn't a chance for appeal. It's automatic.
My understanding is they can't appeal an automatic suspension, only if they upgrade it to multiple games. The ruling really is terrible. I like how the NHL handles high stick penalties....minor penalty if there is no injury.I didn't like the red there, and really, I just generally don't like adding/reviewing penalties via slo-mo in most sports. The same event looked very different in slo-mo than it did in real time. Similar things happen in targeting reviews for football, for example. I would've been fine with a yellow on Balogun for this particular incident as it was a pretty rough play, but I don't really think either player is especially at fault. It's just a function of how the sport and how officiating works. It's all human interpretation.
I would expect the US to appeal it today to try to get him eligible for the next game, IIRC, they are empowered to try that.
It’s an example of why soccer will continue to struggle
This and the bull **** red for covering the face.
#1 is sort of already implemented. The “mistaken identity” rule. Happened in the US/Paraguay game. US was called for a trip and given a yellow card on the field. VAR saw no contact was made and Paraguay flopped. Yellow card to the US player was taken back and assessed to Paraguay instead.My daughter is a soccer player and we were discussing some changes they could make last night.
1. If you sell an injury or a flop and they review and they believe you flopped you have to go stand on the other side of the field for a minute in a penalty box. The amount of rolling around in agony to sell a foul is beyond stupid at this point. Quick review in the booth and send them off in a box. That would cut it way way down.
2. The play last night should have got a yellow card. However, they should be able to review the call after the game with a panel of soccer experts from around the country to determine if a red card should be granted. Just in World cup though. Not normal league soccer. In league soccer you just deal with it. To high of stakes in the world cup.
3. Stop the clock. I am sick of this "How much longer is the game going to be. We can just stop the clock like every other sport
I know none of this will happen btw. Just some improvements to make it more watchable
Sure, but not every challenge that results in a head injury is a red card worthy challenge. Just like not every challenge that results in any injury is automatically a red card.
The question isn't necessarily dangerous, it's did the person's actions endanger the safety of another player. Lots of things are dangerous but fair play, or don't rise to the level of a red card.
In the context of the game I said I didn't think it was a red, but when you see Balogun step on the guy's ankle it obviously is open for interpretation.
My daughter is a soccer player and we were discussing some changes they could make last night.
1. If you sell an injury or a flop and they review and they believe you flopped you have to go stand on the other side of the field for a minute in a penalty box. The amount of rolling around in agony to sell a foul is beyond stupid at this point. Quick review in the booth and send them off in a box. That would cut it way way down.
2. The play last night should have got a yellow card. However, they should be able to review the call after the game with a panel of soccer experts from around the country to determine if a red card should be granted. Just in World cup though. Not normal league soccer. In league soccer you just deal with it. To high of stakes in the world cup.
3. Stop the clock. I am sick of this "How much longer is the game going to be. We can just stop the clock like every other sport
I know none of this will happen btw. Just some improvements to make it more watchable