Confidence in you JP

Yep. Right now Campbell is the 41st highest paid college football coach. That’s a slap in the face to what he’s done. I know he’s deferred money from him to assistants but gotta get him into the Top 25 IMO. $4.3 mil annually would get him to #25. $5 mil would get him to #15. Somewhere in that range feels right.
It’s only a slap in the face to Matt Campbell if he considers it a slap in the face.

I suspect his priorities are elsewhere.
 
I am encouraged to watch this discussion on how to take the step necessary to compete consistently with the top programs financially. It appears as eastern Iowa ages and Des Moines grows that ISU has come up to the U of I level for financial support & bodies in the seats. But just to catch up with the Texas & Oklahoma schools is a different realm. T. Boone Pickens gave $260M for the stadium expansion & $652M up to his death to OSU ath dept & they still are 2nd banana to OU. CMC is our chance & it is going to take some serious financial magic by JP to make it happen. And from his past accomplishments, I think he is up to the task.
We are not up to Iowa donations yet. Need about 7-10MM more.
 
It’s only a slap in the face to Matt Campbell if he considers it a slap in the face.

I suspect his priorities are elsewhere.

Yep. It isnt Pollard's job to walk in and offer a salary or to get to a certain place on the coach salary rankings.

His job is to talk with Campbell and find out what makes him and his family happy here. If that's money, then do that. If that's money for assistants, do that. If that's prioritizing a certain facility improvement, do that. So far, money for himself hasnt seemed to be his primary motivator.
 
I’ve watched the Cyclones in all the old Big 8 stadiums & all the Big 12 except TT & Baylor. It is humbling just to view the obvious advantage in Major Donor skybox revenue exists south of Kansas City. We are the 3rd largest stadium in the B12 seating but we will not have major donors as a source due to the split of a small pie with our Hawkeye friends. If we realistically expect to be competitive long term in the top 15, it will take everybody stepping up at more than a $20 per ticket approach from my observation.
I’m with you on this. Plus I think Pollard needs to get creative to get people to donate $100, $250, or $500. Right now, there is almost no incentive to donate at any level below $500 for a first time donor. Create some perks to incentivize people to start donating at those lower levels.
Other than to retain CMC and help fund continued growth and sustainable success. If non-donors weren’t incentivized this FB season, what will do it?
 
I think the current incentive to donate at least $250 is that is the minimum donation to buy a parking pass.

Maybe the first-time donor gets a free parking pass or something like that. I suppose some public lot can become a donor lot for those folks. I really like the idea to give incentives for first-time donors, and I would not be surprised to see a number of "perks" being part of all donor levels going forward.
There are already increasing “perks” at each giving level. What are we talking about that could be cost neutral or very small?
 
I am encouraged to watch this discussion on how to take the step necessary to compete consistently with the top programs financially. It appears as eastern Iowa ages and Des Moines grows that ISU has come up to the U of I level for financial support & bodies in the seats. But just to catch up with the Texas & Oklahoma schools is a different realm. T. Boone Pickens gave $260M for the stadium expansion & $652M up to his death to OSU ath dept & they still are 2nd banana to OU. CMC is our chance & it is going to take some serious financial magic by JP to make it happen. And from his past accomplishments, I think he is up to the task.
It will take greater financial commitment for ISU fans and alumni, along with some magic from JP.
 
I have talked about this in an older thread. When A&M was in the B12, they started a Century Club encouraging all alumni to donate $100 to the AD. It worked, many did and I swear 1/4 of the cars I would se in Houston had their CC sticker. We need a similar club and reach out to casual fans.
 
It’s only a slap in the face to Matt Campbell if he considers it a slap in the face.

I suspect his priorities are elsewhere.

Maybe. But it’s also just as likely that some day, Matt Campbell is having a bad day and he looks around and sees that 2/3 of the Big 12 is making more money than him and it frustrates him. We know he is different but he’s not a robot. And 99.999% of people aren’t going to turn down a raise they feel they are deserved.

All that said, I trust JP to do his job and get Campbell what he needs.
 
There are already increasing “perks” at each giving level. What are we talking about that could be cost neutral or very small?
You have to make sure you are incentivizing small donors particularly those that maybe can’t go to games. Making them understand what their even small contribution adds. Say you get 50,000 people to donate $50. That’s $2,500,000 right there. I don’t think we are properly recruiting those types. When people can’t hit the $100 mark which is the lowest category they just don’t donate because they don’t understand how that helps.

We want to encourage current donors to do more but the big gains are going to be getting a lot more small donors.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY and TheHelgo
You have to make sure you are incentivizing small donors particularly those that maybe can’t go to games. Making them understand what their even small contribution adds. Say you get 50,000 people to donate $50. That’s $250,000 right there. I don’t think we are properly recruiting those types. When people can’t hit the $100 mark which is the lowest category they just don’t donate because they don’t understand how that helps.

We want to encourage current donors to do more but the big gains are going to be getting a lot more small donors.
Gotcha. When I read comments on incentivizing new donors, I got the impression that they needed to get something in return. I completely agree that an educational campaign should be done to educate fans/alumni on the financial realities if competing and how every bit helps and how. Make everyone understand how they are truly/directly helping *their* AD and teams.

IIRC ISU has the lowest AD giving in the conference and likely ranks low versus P5. It get the challenges, small state, two schools, etc.; but trail schools in similar or worse situations. JP can’t just work magic. Donations and ticket sales have to increase.
 
Gotcha. When I read comments on incentivizing new donors, I got the impression that they needed to get something in return. I completely agree that an educational campaign should be done to educate fans/alumni on the financial realities if competing and how every bit helps and how. Make everyone understand how they are truly/directly helping *their* AD and teams.

IIRC ISU has the lowest AD giving in the conference and likely ranks low versus P5. It get the challenges, small state, two schools, etc.; but trail schools in similar or worse situations. JP can’t just work magic. Donations and ticket sales have to increase.
Well I think you do have to provide something and that’s where you have to get creative. I think at minimum you need a tier that goes down to zero. That signifies any donation is welcome. Currently if you can’t do $100 it doesn’t seem like the AD wants your money.

Something you could do for that level is require it for the light brown football seats and maybe the corners in Hilton.

I’d also like to see more of a break based on donation level than just seating options. I don’t know what you can give people that is cheap but making sure people continue to grow their gifts.

I’d be curious to see the proportion of people who do donate and who don’t. I think that’s where we get hurt a lot as well as not having the big money donors. The middle group I think does a good job.
 
The dumb thing about talking heads is they just look at it as he’s going to leave because “It’s hard to consistently win at ISU” and mention OU as a the obvious roadblock that ISU will always have to be second fiddle to.

Of course, they never say exactly what jobs are a good fit. Every Big 10, ACC and SEC job is second fiddle at best to OSU, Clemson and Alabama. As for actually competing for a NC, not just getting blown out in the playoffs, you probably have OSU, Clemson, Alabama, OU and Georgia. Last I checked these jobs aren’t open. Everybody else has some SERIOUS work to do to legitimately compete for a NC, and won’t be to that point overnight.


Isn't OU 0-whatever in the playoffs? Couple of those were a@@whoopins too. I wouldn't put them on that list just yet. But you're right about Bama, OSU and Clemson.
 
There are already increasing “perks” at each giving level. What are we talking about that could be cost neutral or very small?

If they had apparel that was exclusive to donors it could do something. $100 gets a t-shirt, $250 gets a hoodie or t shirt/maybe 2 t shirts, $500 one of each and a hat. something like that, keep adding some stuff at each donor level. It doesn't cost that much to get a nice screen printing machine. Make these things in house and create some jobs while your at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nrg4isu
If they had apparel that was exclusive to donors it could do something. $100 gets a t-shirt, $250 gets a hoodie or t shirt/maybe 2 t shirts, $500 one of each and a hat. something like that, keep adding some stuff at each donor level. It doesn't cost that much to get a nice screen printing machine. Make these things in house and create some jobs while your at it.
Will just say, not made in house. Our AD needs to raise funds, not make Tshirts. When raising money you don’t cut major corners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StPaulCyclone
If they had apparel that was exclusive to donors it could do something. $100 gets a t-shirt, $250 gets a hoodie or t shirt/maybe 2 t shirts, $500 one of each and a hat. something like that, keep adding some stuff at each donor level. It doesn't cost that much to get a nice screen printing machine. Make these things in house and create some jobs while your at it.

Haha no.
 
Matt's mentor, coach Kehres, built a dynasty and won 11 D3 national championships before retiring as head football coach.

Call me nuts, but I really think Matt doesn't want to just build a top level program and move on to the next challenge. Like his mentor, I think Matt wants to build and SUSTAIN a top level program that's based on culture and values, not the money, 5-star talent, and unforgiving expectations found at blue blood schools.

I think Matt has found a home that fits everything he values.

But the huge difference was Mt Union took the field with more talent than everyone else. They were Alabama of D3, heck they even better than that. So relatively speaking, Mt Union had 5 star talent at the D3 level. They had a lot of D1 transfers playing for them.
 
During the Great Depression, Clemson started a donor program called I.P.T.A.Y. - which stands for I Pay Ten A Year. That was their exact goal, to get as many people as you can involved and invested without having to break the bank.

This is huge and it NEEDS to be tried here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlaCyclone