CBI...Yes or No

And in the scheme of determining who is the best in college football..........all this means squat. Hey.........20 years ago there was someone saying the exact same thing about the Insight Bowl as you are about the CBI. Have to start somewhere.

Exactly. Hell, give me a 128 team NCAA tourney. I'll watch that for sure.
 
I am so sick of people making this statement. Its the dumbest statement in all of sports. Its not 'rewarding mediocrity', and there is nothing wrong with letting players and fans enjoy another game or two, or letting bowls or tournaments make a few bucks off of it. If it were up to me id open up the bowl eligibility restrictions even more. Let bowls use SOS as a factor, not just a meaningless w-l total when 1\3 of teams games are out of conference... many 4-5 win BCS teams are more deserving than 6-8 win non-bcs teams (see: northern illinois).

Its giving a mediocre benefit for a mediocre team. Thats fair. The rest of us who just enjoy watching more football and more basketball will enjoy the additional games. Its a long offseason between april and september.


Yes, it is. Bowl games used to a reward for doing very well, not for making it to .500. We have enough pro sports that have playoff systems set up to allow bad teams into the playoffs. Do we really need it in CBB also? The obvious, and correct answer, is NO.
 
And in the scheme of determining who is the best in college football..........all this means squat. Hey.........20 years ago there was someone saying the exact same thing about the Insight Bowl as you are about the CBI. Have to start somewhere.

When the product is legitimate, yes. When the product is something that should die, like the CBI, then one the best place to start is to curb the idea before it gets off the ground.
 
Yes, it is. Bowl games used to a reward for doing very well, not for making it to .500. We have enough pro sports that have playoff systems set up to allow bad teams into the playoffs. Do we really need it in CBB also? The obvious, and correct answer, is NO.

Hardly obvious or correct.

Who loses from having more teams in the postseason?

The fans? Nope- they get to see their teams play one or more additional games. Win for them.
The players? Nope- They get to keep playing with each other. Win for them.
The schools? Nope- They make more money and keep fans excited. Win for them.
The networks? Nope- more games to broadcast. Win for them.
The sponsors at the arenas? Nope- more games=more exposure for their ads. Win for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CycloneErik
Half of D-1 teams going to bowl games is a huge mistake as well. Instead of being rewarded for actual achievements, teams are now rewarded for being mediocre.
.

right on! Let's just cancel our sport's teams. Why bother? Ohio State and the SouthEast conference...if they shed Ole Miss and Vandy.....should be the only schools to even have football teams. Why stop there??? We'll Have Team America Football and we'll play in a true World Super College Duper No Arguing About It Super Championship Bowl! Just like in Olympic Basketball....it will be very intriguing.

Don't you guys who parrot the "We MUST have a National Championship in College Football!!!" line from the radio sports jocks are just being played???? It is for ratings, dude. The bowl system is fine, and uniquely established. The CBI is there, it is real, it is a good spot for this team and this coach at this time.
 
Hardly obvious or correct.

Who loses from having more teams in the postseason?

The fans? Nope- they get to see their teams play one or more additional games. Win for them.
The players? Nope- They get to keep playing with each other. Win for them.
The schools? Nope- They make more money and keep fans excited. Win for them.
The networks? Nope- more games to broadcast. Win for them.
The sponsors at the arenas? Nope- more games=more exposure for their ads. Win for them.


Anybody with an ounce of pride and respect for all that is true in CBB will lose their soul if the CBI continues to stick around.
 
right on! Let's just cancel our sport's teams. Why bother? Ohio State and the SouthEast conference...if they shed Ole Miss and Vandy.....should be the only schools to even have football teams. Why stop there??? We'll Have Team America Football and we'll play in a true World Super College Duper No Arguing About It Super Championship Bowl! Just like in Olympic Basketball....it will be very intriguing.

Don't you guys who parrot the "We MUST have a National Championship in College Football!!!" line from the radio sports jocks are just being played???? It is for ratings, dude. The bowl system is fine, and uniquely established. The CBI is there, it is real, it is a good spot for this team and this coach at this time.

Wrong. The CBI is good for no team, anytime.

Fact: I like the bowl system also, just think there about 15 bowls that could use chopping.
 
Without a doubt. I would buy a ticket the minute they went on sale.

Voluntarily saying no to more basketball in the definition of a rebuilding year makes absolutely no sense. It would be different if we had borderline NCAA talent and underachieved, ala '09-'10.
 
Did anyone ever answer the question of if our transfers would get to play or not? Because if they do, this would be huge for us.


And I support this if we get invited. Right now, there is no postseason that we are too good for. If the players want it, do it.

I can't see how they'd get to play, but if they did, I'd pay a bunch for that.

Of course, I'd pay to watch us play the Hampton scout team.

My vote--take it and run. Then run somebody over, and keep running teams over until we win the whole thing.
 
I am so sick of people making this statement. Its the dumbest statement in all of sports. Its not 'rewarding mediocrity', and there is nothing wrong with letting players and fans enjoy another game or two, or letting bowls or tournaments make a few bucks off of it. If it were up to me id open up the bowl eligibility restrictions even more. Let bowls use SOS as a factor, not just a meaningless w-l total when 1\3 of teams games are out of conference... many 4-5 win BCS teams are more deserving than 6-8 win non-bcs teams (see: northern illinois).

Its giving a mediocre benefit for a mediocre team. Thats fair. The rest of us who just enjoy watching more football and more basketball will enjoy the additional games. Its a long offseason between april and september.

If they called the winner of the CBI a National Champion, that would be a problem.
Since that won't happen, it's just a fun time, and that's kind of the idea right now.

Next year, it would be kind of embarrassing. This year, it's postseason, and it's been forever.
 
Wrong. The CBI is good for no team, anytime.

Fact: I like the bowl system also, just think there about 15 bowls that could use chopping.

Gotta give it to you Yoda.....you are solid in your position. LOL. Seriously.....this is probably the first time I laughed today. So much more enjoyable to debate the viablility of a basketball tourney than to turn on cable news right now.
I sure hope I can get that 5th row seat at mid court for the CBI! Beat Wisconsin Green BAy!!!!
 
If they called the winner of the CBI a National Champion, that would be a problem.
Since that won't happen, it's just a fun time, and that's kind of the idea right now.

Next year, it would be kind of embarrassing. This year, it's postseason, and it's been forever.
Agree 100%. If this was in the middle of Johnny's tenure, or TF or LE then no-but I think a lot of fans and players and coaches would be thrilled with any kind of post-season since it's been 5 years. Now next year or especially 2 or 3 years down the road I would say NO and am hoping that's not even remotely a discussion that happens then.
 
@Yoda
This is a hypothetical and only judge the question not what you think will really happen:

Would you rather we play in the tournament, gain experience, have the players returning get better to help our team next year.

OR

Not play and stay the same level.