Why do you think so? Sowell played well but Eskildsen has easily been the most consistent.Sowell by a wide margin is most reliable. Then a close call between Eskildsen and Townsend. Good things will keep happening if we keep throwing at Sowell.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do you think so? Sowell played well but Eskildsen has easily been the most consistent.Sowell by a wide margin is most reliable. Then a close call between Eskildsen and Townsend. Good things will keep happening if we keep throwing at Sowell.
I had a similar thought this morning. Our fan base carries too much baggage from the past. At some point we have to realize our program is just flat out better than programs like Arizona and Cincinnati and have confidence in our team.My pet peeve across CF and IE analysis is making everyone we play seem like the ‘85 Bears. It’s happened 5 straight weeks now, including against South Dakota.
I get it, it’s an emotional hedge but at some point, a top 15 team that has demonstrated high success for 2 straight seasons is better than most teams on their schedule.
Sowell catches in traffic better than every other WR, it's that simple. He catches everything. Feed him the rock. It's hard to beat teams over the air strictly via scheme and busted coverages, you also need the guy who's simply bigger and better than the defender hanging on him.Why do you think so? Sowell played well but Eskildsen has easily been the most consistent.
Sowell had a couple deep balls saturday, but he also had a couple plays that he turned into bigger plays. I think about the 8 yard slant at the start of the 3rd quarter that he turned into a 40+ yard playSowell catches in traffic better than every other WR, it's that simple. He catches everything. Feed him the rock. It's hard to beat teams over the air strictly via scheme and busted coverages, you also need the guy who's simply bigger and better than the defender hanging on him.
That being said, I'd like to see Eskildsen's usage go up also. He needs more than 2-3 catches a game, but similar to Sowell, he's primarily being used as a deep threat and little else. There's quite a bit of overlap on these two.
I agree. Although, with the injuries leading up to the Arizona game, and after seeing some guys go down/leave the game on Saturday, I think there's a reasonable level of apprehension on the defensive side of the ball heading into Cinci.I had a similar thought this morning. Our fan base carries too much baggage from the past. At some point we have to realize our program is just flat out better than programs like Arizona and Cincinnati and have confidence in our team.
A lot of the plays, he's lined up on either boundary. I think that slant catch was from the slot? I like it. Move him around everywhere. Throw him the ball everywhere. Feed him until he proves he can't handle more as far as I'm concerned. Make defenses commit more resources to him and open up others instead. Our best asset to keep developing the pass game right now is get WRs involved and for them to make the catches and plays. Making the catches in particular has been a sore spot.Sowell had a couple deep balls saturday, but he also had a couple plays that he turned into bigger plays. I think about the 8 yard slant at the start of the 3rd quarter that he turned into a 40+ yard play
I had a similar thought this morning. Our fan base carries too much baggage from the past. At some point we have to realize our program is just flat out better than programs like Arizona and Cincinnati and have confidence in our team.
Is there a good reason Rocco and other starters were playing late when we were up 3 TDs?
He's dropped many balls this year. I think he looks good too but I don't think he's obviously better.Sowell catches in traffic better than every other WR, it's that simple. He catches everything. Feed him the rock. It's hard to beat teams over the air strictly via scheme and busted coverages, you also need the guy who's simply bigger and better than the defender hanging on him.
That being said, I'd like to see Eskildsen's usage go up also. He needs more than 2-3 catches a game, but similar to Sowell, he's primarily being used as a deep threat and little else. There's quite a bit of overlap on these two.
He's dropped many balls this year. I think he looks good too but I don't think he's obviously better.
Also they're not really fast enough out of their break to be getting slot type routes so they get vertical shots in 1 on 1 situations.
I like the dude and think he adds a ton to the Team, but him catching everything might be some recency bias. You can tell he is more comfortable each week and I think he will continue to both improve and build rapport with Rocco, but Rocco's completion rate is 53.3% to Sowell and 65.8% on the year to all recievers.A lot of the plays, he's lined up on either boundary. I think that slant catch was from the slot? I like it. Move him around everywhere. Throw him the ball everywhere. Feed him until he proves he can't handle more as far as I'm concerned. Make defenses commit more resources to him and open up others instead. Our best asset to keep developing the pass game right now is get WRs involved and for them to make the catches and plays. Making the catches in particular has been a sore spot.
It's true. You see things clearer/sharper with contacts then with glasses. At least it was the same with me.Sowells comment about the contacts is crazy to me. could he just not see that well before?
Seein is the most important thing, son.Sowells comment about the contacts is crazy to me. could he just not see that well before?
A massive portion of Rocco's completions aren't to WRs -- they're to TEs. 5 games in, Sowell on SAT was our best WR performance of the year by far. 4/150 (+ another that was a DPI, if I remember correctly) isn't an accident, or at least I'm hoping it wasn't. That's the kind of line that says a newer guy finally put all the pieces together and is ready to roll. This was the first game all season we had someone break 100 receiving yards, and most his share was on contested catches with guys stuck on him. Those hands seem to work.I like the dude and think he adds a ton to the Team, but him catching everything might be some recency bias. You can tell he is more comfortable each week and I think he will continue to both improve and build rapport with Rocco, but Rocco's completion rate is 53.3% to Sowell and 65.8% on the year to all recievers.
Why do you think so? Sowell played well but Eskildsen has easily been the most consistent.
Seein is the most important thing, son.
Also generally adds peripheral vision.It's true. You see things clearer/sharper with contacts then with glasses. At least it was the same with me.