Extremely soComputers still like Houston even after the San Diego State loss?
Extremely soComputers still like Houston even after the San Diego State loss?
Why the Houston love? They have a home loss to Auburn and two neutral court losses. Our only loss is to Auburn, on a neutral site. Their best win is Texas A&M at home, which is worse than our win over Marquette. Seems weird.Torvik loved them going into the season. I think they were the preseason #1.
Still #5 now despite the losses.
But if you filter out the preseason effects...
#5
Yes. Still #5. They have three losses but three "good losses" to #3, #9, and #39 (not so good then).
Iowa State is #11 without the preseason effects for comparison.
Oddly enough the Cyclones are #2 on offense (after Auburn) and #64 on defense so far.
Definitely has the feel of a team wanting to outscore people more than it has since TJ came back.
Why the Houston love? They have a home loss to Auburn and two neutral court losses. Our only loss is to Auburn, on a neutral site. Their best win is Texas A&M at home, which is worse than our win over Marquette. Seems weird.
Having 3 "good losses" after playing 20-30 games I understand. Having 3 "good losses" in 7 games....the #5 rankings doesn't make sense.
I think we're still going to be a team that wants to lock down our opponents, but the rotations among the new players are just too loose right now. Luckily we have enough firepower to outscore until that rounds into shape.Torvik loved them going into the season. I think they were the preseason #1.
Still #5 now despite the losses.
But if you filter out the preseason effects...
#5
Yes. Still #5. They have three losses but three "good losses" to #3, #9, and #39 (not so good then).
Iowa State is #11 without the preseason effects for comparison.
Oddly enough the Cyclones are #2 on offense (after Auburn) and #64 on defense so far.
Definitely has the feel of a team wanting to outscore people more than it has since TJ came back.
I think we're still going to be a team that wants to lock down our opponents, but the rotations among the new players are just too loose right now. Luckily we have enough firepower to outscore until that rounds into shape.
Yep, and most of it has to be filtered through the fact that we've played a few really talented offensive teams alreadyHopefully -- things do seem different on some level this year, though.
The past three years felt like the same software (clunky offense buttressed by the defensive intensity of the team overall and the "no middle" / "trap everything" scheme) run on progressively better hardware each year (e.g., upgraded overall roster talent and experience and progression from returners).
This team hasn't been winning the same way. It is outscoring teams (e.g., Dayton and Colorado) while playing passable defense but definitely not defense up to the standards of the past three years. Marquette kept themselves in the game with crisp passing that easily overstretched our defense and ruined the rotations and drilled the open threes it produced. There was far less of that the last few years because our defense was such a bother and produced so many turnovers before a team could even run a clean set like that one.
This last paragraph is what scares me about the Iowa matchup. They can light it up if they can do anything. We are really going to need some better perimeter defense. I still think we are helping a bit too much on D, but I'm definitely no expert.Hopefully -- things do seem different on some level this year, though.
The past three years felt like the same software (clunky offense buttressed by the defensive intensity of the team overall and the "no middle" / "trap everything" scheme) run on progressively better hardware each year (e.g., upgraded overall roster talent and experience and progression from returners).
This team hasn't been winning the same way. It is outscoring teams (e.g., Dayton and Colorado) while playing passable defense but definitely not defense up to the standards of the past three years. Marquette kept themselves in the game with crisp passing that easily overstretched our defense and ruined the rotations and drilled the open threes it produced. There was far less of that the last few years because our defense was such a bother and produced so many turnovers before a team could even run a clean set like that one.
Obviously the threat Iowa posses is the ability to get hot and put up points in a hurry. Our offense is better this year and that should help us keep pace if they hit a hot streak, as their defense is still pretty suspect.This last paragraph is what scares me about the Iowa matchup. They can light it up if they can do anything. We are really going to need some better perimeter defense. I still think we are helping a bit too much on D, but I'm definitely no expert.
Houston is kind of similar to ISU early last season (except with better losses). They've absolutely destroyed their three bad opponents, with three Barttorvik game scores of 100 against Jackson St., Louisiana, and Hofstra--essentially "perfect" games. For context, there were only five game scores of 100 across all of college basketball last season and Iowa State had two of those.Why the Houston love? They have a home loss to Auburn and two neutral court losses. Our only loss is to Auburn, on a neutral site. Their best win is Texas A&M at home, which is worse than our win over Marquette. Seems weird.
Having 3 "good losses" after playing 20-30 games I understand. Having 3 "good losses" in 7 games....the #5 rankings doesn't make sense.
The key here is fouls. If the refs stay out of it, we'll be fine. If not........I know the Iowa/Iowa State series is strange and home court is enormous...with that said...Id be extremely surprised if we dont overwhelm them. I suspect our guards will apply heavy pressure and dare their guards to penetrate. Run them off the 3 point line at all costs. Their backcourt is full of shooters with no top tier athleticism/quickness. Jackson/Jefferson should have an enormous nignt as Iowas frontcourt is extremely thin both literally and figuratively. They also have no rim protection. Gilbert/Lipsey/Jones will get downhill to the bucket w ease all night.
Vegas will set this point spread right around 5. Like I said, strange series and hard to win rivalry games on the road. Really like this matchup for the Clones though.
It sounds like Watson is hurt a little bit and that is what kept him out in Maui.Anyone else curious in regards to the true frosh Indrusaitis getting minutes over Watson? I know Indrusaitis was a highly heralded recruit and has a ton of potential...but...the moment seemed really big for him in that Marquette game. I thought Watson was playing the best basketball of his career late in the year last season. Watson is an elite defender/rebounder. Knows his role on offense. Fully trust TJ. Im sure Indrusaitis will settle im as the year goes along.
Had not heard that. Good to hear! Like I said, Indrusaitis has a ton of potential. Suppose I was a bit surprised he had jumped Watson though.It sounds like Watson is hurt a little bit and that is what kept him out in Maui.
Watson will play minutes in league play.
Even taking into account ISU's opponents in those game, that stat blows my mind.For context, there were only five game scores of 100 across all of college basketball last season and Iowa State had two of those.
It sounds like Watson is hurt a little bit and that is what kept him out in Maui.
Watson will play minutes in league play.