Blake Buchanan commits

Statefan10

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
May 20, 2019
21,166
27,157
113
It’s a reference to being a low-salary team that has to employ moneyball tactics to win. Watch Moneyball some time if you haven’t - good stuff
Yeah yeah I messed up lol that’s a great movie.
 

2forISU

Well-Known Member
Oct 8, 2008
6,249
2,209
113
Did you watch his highlight video? For a 6'11" kid he is plenty athletic. Reminds me of the Nelson kid from Bama or Veesaar of Zona.

On offense he looks solid in PNR with nice runner in paint.

Also he's young so a couple years to develop.

As I sad earlier, you got a decent pickup but he is definitely a role player day 1. When I watched the highlights of him against the top teams in the ACC or even tourney teams, he doesn't look very athletic. Below are some of this box scores against tourney teams, I do agree he has time to develop but the college game today is not really about development.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NoCreativity

TheDudeAbides

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
90
140
33
You may be correct that some thought Cluff “was in the fold”. In this day and age, never assume anything until ink is dry.

Don’t confuse athleticism with working hard. Chat worked his a$$ off man but very limited offensively. Jackson good around the basket but outside that not much else. I would argue our front court pickups are more skilled, and if they have the motor that BRE had, then these are making us better in the front court.
We were led to believe that by the constant references to him, and the fact that Iowa State was going to "spend big" in the portal.

I mean anyone can argue anything ha. Doesn't mean it's true. I want to point out I don't think these are bad players. I'm sure they will work hard, and give good minutes. I'd argue (;)) we are about the same as we just were in the post. I'll even give you a slight increase..still not the big jump in skill & athleticism we all saw that we drastically needed down the stretch of the season. Not sure anyone can argue that at this point.

If we get Cluff...this all goes away.
 

TheDudeAbides

Active Member
Jul 28, 2015
90
140
33
He's more athletic than a 6'11" Jackson. And it's not close. If he has Chatfield's motor- it's a win.
Haha I love the optimism, but Jackson was able to do everything I just watched in that highlight video. Now, if he can catch a pass then we're in business.
 

5Cy

Member
Jun 26, 2015
57
64
18
IF Cluff is still in play this isn’t a bad option.

Mulder replaces Watson
Buchanon replaces Chatfield
Cluff replaces Jackson

I’m good with that.

Go find a diamond in the rough SG like Motherf**cker Jones and we’re back in business!
 

Malone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 7, 2010
2,918
5,351
113
Des Moines
Do you like any players on our roster? Any portal adds?

TJ's the coach and has shown a solid eye for portal talent. Would I love a Tugler or Roberts? Sure.

Who would you like to see TJ go after in the portal.
I love the returning core. Knowing who we have returning, it’s apparent what we could really use to get to the goal of a team that can compete for a final 4: a slashing guard that can shoot, and bigs that give more than Jackson and Chat.

We got a guard that shot 42% at a lower level conference, that has no left hand, and turns it over a lot. The turnover part is especially concerning. If you look across college ball there are plenty of examples of glow-up guards that moved up to the power four, and in almost all cases they are low turnover guys. It speaks to decision making and skill.

We got two bigs - one undersized that'll play spot minutes, another that was signed to presumably replace Dishon’s minutes but adds almost nothing offensively.

I now see an offensively challenged team built from spare parts outside of Milan and Tamin. You need guards that can break down defenses. Rohde seems fine, but again he seems to be a 10 ppg guy that prefers to defer.

With the way we’re recruiting the portal, two things seem apparent:

1. we still have to moneyball and find value guys in the portal
2. we are hoping for a lot from Batemon and Toure.

I was hoping #1 wasn’t so glaringly true as what the results are showing.