You are really asking this question after all of these posts? Can you effin read?
They would get involved because of the looming possibility of 25-30 more schools, including ISU, getting destroyed by Fox's and ESPN's realignment manipulation to their benefit. Got it?
Good luck successfully arguing that this minority bloc (in terms of constituent voters) has been destroyed while making more than ever before, with schools having the best access to top college football postseason
It sucks for us, but the consolidation of big brands adds value to the collective worth of CFB by making the sport more national, facilitating more big ratings, and better product identification.
Going back to very regional 8 or 10 team conferences lowers the total TV revenue when most of the nation DGAF about the legacy PAC, Big 8, SWC , Big East, and ACC conferences.
We saw what happened when the PAC 10 went to market. There is no white knight media provider coming to save the old era. It has nothing to do with CFP rights, either. Stop propagating that misinformation.
No media company stepped up to create a 3rd conference that was a peer to to P2 out of ACC, Big 12, and PAC. Yet, you think they’re going to want in the rump version of these conferences?