We are becoming a very soft people.50?
More like 35 when you look and feel 50.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are becoming a very soft people.50?
More like 35 when you look and feel 50.
I never said they aren’t needed. You are stretching things quite a bit there. Do you take attendance? Think back to the Econ 101s and psych 101s (the 400-500 people lectures) halfway through, how full were the rooms? Maybe half of what started? No attendance taken and attendance was weak. Yet people figure out how to pass the class. Means that students are figuring things out for themselves. Is that good or bad?You're on a strange tangent here. University teaching involves teaching students how to research. There's a lot to that people don't just pick up when you leave them to the wolves.
You're somehow in a spot where teachers, counselors, and all aren't needed, students don't want to be in class and won't go, but they'll somehow just do the advanced work of researching without all that. The picture you're putting together doesn't make a lick of sense.
We are becoming a very soft people.
I never said they aren’t needed. You are stretching things quite a bit there. Do you take attendance? Think back to the Econ 101s and psych 101s (the 400-500 people lectures) halfway through, how full were the rooms? Maybe half of what started? No attendance taken and attendance was weak. Yet people figure out how to pass the class. Means that students are figuring things out for themselves. Is that good or bad?
The person with a degree will advance faster in most fields because of having the degree. That may be somewhat less true today than 20 years ago due to increased number of meaningless classes and degrees, but it still carries some weight. The degree says the person has the intelligence and discipline to complete a degree program and likely has better communication skills and problem-solving abilities than the guy without a degree. Of course, those skills will need to be combined with some practical knowledge of the particular field of endeavor.Now years ago people got horrific advice that you could just get a degree in anything and be fine
Such an education is technically possible, but there is no way I know of to gain any credential saying what you've learned. And few people have the discipline to continue any organized program with no outside accountability.I'm not talking about using Youtube to learn material you want to make a career out of. I'm talking about using Youtube to educate yourself on things outside of your career field for free rather than paying $10,000+ to learn the same things at a University.
If you are saying that telling students to go research a company and your presentation is on such and such day and I’ll see you then is considered guidance, then yes I guess college is guidance learning.Yet the entire project was guided from the start!
Not in the early 90s. All exams, like most of my 100 and 200s were. Chem stuff had labs but they were graded separately. Psych 101 was like cheM 163 where it had many sections and you show up at night to have mass exams all over campus so people could not inform others of what was on the tests.I believe those 101 classes had assignments and not just tests, if I recall. That's guided teaching.
If you are saying that telling students to go research a company and your presentation is on such and such day and I’ll see you then is considered guidance, then yes I guess college is guidance learning.
My thoughts of guidance learning is here is the Information in the lecture and you will have tests strictly on my lectures.
Not in the early 90s. All exams, like most of my 100 and 200s were. Chem stuff had labs but they were graded separately. Psych 101 was like cheM 163 where it had many sections and you show up at night to have mass exams all over campus so people could not inform others of what was on the tests.
I never said they aren’t needed. You are stretching things quite a bit there. Do you take attendance? Think back to the Econ 101s and psych 101s (the 400-500 people lectures) halfway through, how full were the rooms? Maybe half of what started? No attendance taken and attendance was weak. Yet people figure out how to pass the class. Means that students are figuring things out for themselves. Is that good or bad?
I don't know how someone is expected to succeed if college actually costs 250k (the TCU number I saw earlier).
I did 4 years undergrad and then grad school at ISU and had 30k debt at the end. That even seemed like a lot but was probably reasonable. Of course even then that included 'scholarships'. Undergrad was supposedly costing about 78k for those 4 and that was nearly 30 years ago. That would have been way too much IMO.
Good luck nowadays getting in the door to any serious field with a completely unrelated degree. I’m a huge proponent of higher Ed but many of the majors people choose are not worth the cost and can very much limit their careers.The person with a degree will advance faster in most fields because of having the degree. That may be somewhat less true today than 20 years ago due to increased number of meaningless classes and degrees, but it still carries some weight. The degree says the person has the intelligence and discipline to complete a degree program and likely has better communication skills and problem-solving abilities than the guy without a degree. Of course, those skills will need to be combined with some practical knowledge of the particular field of endeavor.
It doesn’t. TCU is a private college, almost no one is paying that full cost, they get merit scholarships just by applying. Same for most legit private universities.I don't know how someone is expected to succeed if college actually costs 250k (the TCU number I saw earlier).
I did 4 years undergrad and then grad school at ISU and had 30k debt at the end. That even seemed like a lot but was probably reasonable. Of course even then that included 'scholarships'. Undergrad was supposedly costing about 78k for those 4 and that was nearly 30 years ago. That would have been way too much IMO.
Yeah I remember my parents fought over who got to include me as a dependent for tax purposes. I was the one paying the bills. They would offer to pay the difference on my tax return if I put dependent. I think I asked for help one semester for books. GI bill definitely helped. Bought a car and took 2 trips to Europe.Any students in college now that get 0 help from their parents, if they aren’t very wealthy, go kick their ass. Parents of middle class and below income receive either a 2k or 2500 tax credit, not deduction but credit, for you for up to 4 years. Parents should pass that along.
Estimate what your food bill was for that kid and pay that, a couple grand helps big time. Right there is 1/4 the cost, tax credit and food bill, of college.
Agree, too much of a college is about getting that credential rather than actually learning the thing the credential claims you now know.Such an education is technically possible, but there is no way I know of to gain any credential saying what you've learned. And few people have the discipline to continue any organized program with no outside accountability.
They had text books but tests were over lectures for the strict lecture/exam classes.Interesting. Where did the material come from that was on the exams? Was a specific textbook required or did you just have to check out books from the library and get lucky you read the correct ones?
lower taxes isnt always good. I live in Louisiana and politicians here have lowered taxes to the point we have terrible roads, bridges in disrepair, poor utility service, and poor schools.
No one likes waste, but part of being a part of civilized society is paying for the general welfare, especially for children and education.