WVU Eliminating Degree Programs-Future of Higher Ed

You're on a strange tangent here. University teaching involves teaching students how to research. There's a lot to that people don't just pick up when you leave them to the wolves.

You're somehow in a spot where teachers, counselors, and all aren't needed, students don't want to be in class and won't go, but they'll somehow just do the advanced work of researching without all that. The picture you're putting together doesn't make a lick of sense.
I never said they aren’t needed. You are stretching things quite a bit there. Do you take attendance? Think back to the Econ 101s and psych 101s (the 400-500 people lectures) halfway through, how full were the rooms? Maybe half of what started? No attendance taken and attendance was weak. Yet people figure out how to pass the class. Means that students are figuring things out for themselves. Is that good or bad?
 
I never said they aren’t needed. You are stretching things quite a bit there. Do you take attendance? Think back to the Econ 101s and psych 101s (the 400-500 people lectures) halfway through, how full were the rooms? Maybe half of what started? No attendance taken and attendance was weak. Yet people figure out how to pass the class. Means that students are figuring things out for themselves. Is that good or bad?

I believe those 101 classes had assignments and not just tests, if I recall. That's guided teaching.
 
Now years ago people got horrific advice that you could just get a degree in anything and be fine
The person with a degree will advance faster in most fields because of having the degree. That may be somewhat less true today than 20 years ago due to increased number of meaningless classes and degrees, but it still carries some weight. The degree says the person has the intelligence and discipline to complete a degree program and likely has better communication skills and problem-solving abilities than the guy without a degree. Of course, those skills will need to be combined with some practical knowledge of the particular field of endeavor.
 
I'm not talking about using Youtube to learn material you want to make a career out of. I'm talking about using Youtube to educate yourself on things outside of your career field for free rather than paying $10,000+ to learn the same things at a University.
Such an education is technically possible, but there is no way I know of to gain any credential saying what you've learned. And few people have the discipline to continue any organized program with no outside accountability.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ISULibrarian
Yet the entire project was guided from the start!
If you are saying that telling students to go research a company and your presentation is on such and such day and I’ll see you then is considered guidance, then yes I guess college is guidance learning.

My thoughts of guidance learning is here is the Information in the lecture and you will have tests strictly on my lectures.
 
I believe those 101 classes had assignments and not just tests, if I recall. That's guided teaching.
Not in the early 90s. All exams, like most of my 100 and 200s were. Chem stuff had labs but they were graded separately. Psych 101 was like cheM 163 where it had many sections and you show up at night to have mass exams all over campus so people could not inform others of what was on the tests.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: cycloneG
If you are saying that telling students to go research a company and your presentation is on such and such day and I’ll see you then is considered guidance, then yes I guess college is guidance learning.

My thoughts of guidance learning is here is the Information in the lecture and you will have tests strictly on my lectures.

Gotcha. Just a difference in phrase definition. Guided learning can take many forms, not just lectures and tests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BCClone
Not in the early 90s. All exams, like most of my 100 and 200s were. Chem stuff had labs but they were graded separately. Psych 101 was like cheM 163 where it had many sections and you show up at night to have mass exams all over campus so people could not inform others of what was on the tests.

Interesting. Where did the material come from that was on the exams? Was a specific textbook required or did you just have to check out books from the library and get lucky you read the correct ones?
 
I never said they aren’t needed. You are stretching things quite a bit there. Do you take attendance? Think back to the Econ 101s and psych 101s (the 400-500 people lectures) halfway through, how full were the rooms? Maybe half of what started? No attendance taken and attendance was weak. Yet people figure out how to pass the class. Means that students are figuring things out for themselves. Is that good or bad?

I sat in the front. I didn't look back.
You're making a weird jump from lack of attendance to figuring things out, and just declaring that to be true. There's a pretty big gap there, and then you wrap it up with a black and white question.

Survey classes I've taught have remained full the entire semester with rare exceptions. I guess that's bad, or I'm just really good.
 
I don't know how someone is expected to succeed if college actually costs 250k (the TCU number I saw earlier).
I did 4 years undergrad and then grad school at ISU and had 30k debt at the end. That even seemed like a lot but was probably reasonable. Of course even then that included 'scholarships'. Undergrad was supposedly costing about 78k for those 4 and that was nearly 30 years ago. That would have been way too much IMO.
 
I don't know how someone is expected to succeed if college actually costs 250k (the TCU number I saw earlier).
I did 4 years undergrad and then grad school at ISU and had 30k debt at the end. That even seemed like a lot but was probably reasonable. Of course even then that included 'scholarships'. Undergrad was supposedly costing about 78k for those 4 and that was nearly 30 years ago. That would have been way too much IMO.

Pile on housing after they find a job. I don't think they're supposed to succeed.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: clonechemist
The person with a degree will advance faster in most fields because of having the degree. That may be somewhat less true today than 20 years ago due to increased number of meaningless classes and degrees, but it still carries some weight. The degree says the person has the intelligence and discipline to complete a degree program and likely has better communication skills and problem-solving abilities than the guy without a degree. Of course, those skills will need to be combined with some practical knowledge of the particular field of endeavor.
Good luck nowadays getting in the door to any serious field with a completely unrelated degree. I’m a huge proponent of higher Ed but many of the majors people choose are not worth the cost and can very much limit their careers.
 
I don't know how someone is expected to succeed if college actually costs 250k (the TCU number I saw earlier).
I did 4 years undergrad and then grad school at ISU and had 30k debt at the end. That even seemed like a lot but was probably reasonable. Of course even then that included 'scholarships'. Undergrad was supposedly costing about 78k for those 4 and that was nearly 30 years ago. That would have been way too much IMO.
It doesn’t. TCU is a private college, almost no one is paying that full cost, they get merit scholarships just by applying. Same for most legit private universities.
 
Any students in college now that get 0 help from their parents, if they aren’t very wealthy, go kick their ass. Parents of middle class and below income receive either a 2k or 2500 tax credit, not deduction but credit, for you for up to 4 years. Parents should pass that along.

Estimate what your food bill was for that kid and pay that, a couple grand helps big time. Right there is 1/4 the cost, tax credit and food bill, of college.
Yeah I remember my parents fought over who got to include me as a dependent for tax purposes. I was the one paying the bills. They would offer to pay the difference on my tax return if I put dependent. I think I asked for help one semester for books. GI bill definitely helped. Bought a car and took 2 trips to Europe.
 
Such an education is technically possible, but there is no way I know of to gain any credential saying what you've learned. And few people have the discipline to continue any organized program with no outside accountability.
Agree, too much of a college is about getting that credential rather than actually learning the thing the credential claims you now know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyrealist and Kinch
ISU Classes that had most impact on me in my life:
Golf (taught by a professional. Tuition was third the cost if I paid for private lessons).
Astronomy and Astrophysics (very cool. Helped me in my faith and I still get my telescope out.)
Advertising (was in my major. Every student should take a marketing class to learn how ad companies target you.)
My philosophy was don’t use college only as chore to complete to get you job, but use it to make you a well rounded person in life. My dad told me to enjoy it and take advantage of everything college offered.
It’s sad when colleges cut majors.
 
Interesting. Where did the material come from that was on the exams? Was a specific textbook required or did you just have to check out books from the library and get lucky you read the correct ones?
They had text books but tests were over lectures for the strict lecture/exam classes.
 
lower taxes isnt always good. I live in Louisiana and politicians here have lowered taxes to the point we have terrible roads, bridges in disrepair, poor utility service, and poor schools.

No one likes waste, but part of being a part of civilized society is paying for the general welfare, especially for children and education.

It can work if you have another way to make up for it, such as heavy tourism (FL) or a massive population & business base (TX).

Nevada is similar in pop to IA but Vegas brings a *ton* of revenue in.

Iowa unfortunately doesn’t check a lot of those boxes. It’s rational to want to pay lower taxes and to cut waste, but if your state can’t pay its bills you end up paying for it one way or another.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron