Mangino tweet

So five years is good, but 7 is too much? Now I know.
5 is good, 7 is never too much.
twss-michael-scott.gif
 
2 years ago you gave the like tag to a 5 year old bump. You just told JP that the bump he gave today (7 years) should have been a new thread instead due to age.

Hence 5 is good, 7 is too long.
He's upset that this tweet is about KU not ISU.
I made this site go down the shitter because i shared it. Mods please send my burning body out to sea.
 
Where you been dirty? Ain’t seen you in awhile.
I thought about hooking up with you in Iowa City....well, not hooking up, but giving you one of my hammer rebel lagers......I followed your parking posts. I'm kinda saving my coming out party for the orange bowl win we will eventually get.
I'm pretty busy at work....my productivity has to support about 40 other humans to live. If I quiet quit, I am definitely going to hit some cyclone volleyball games.
 
Everyone in the world thinks Leipold is doing a great job……. it isn’t news that Mangino thinks so too.
 
Most people don't read every thread to completion on stay on top of new posts. So in cases like this, the "jump to new" link doesn't help. I've never read this thread, so I have to start towards the end and work my way backwards to see what it was that resurrected the years old thread. And, sure enough, completely pointless post.

To help counteract some people in this forum's proclivity to bump threads from ages past to append a mostly irrelevant and inconsequential copy of another site's post, a "jump to the new post that bumped decade old thread" link would be cool.
 
Most people don't read every thread to completion on stay on top of new posts. So in cases like this, the "jump to new" link doesn't help. I've never read this thread, so I have to start towards the end and work my way backwards to see what it was that resurrected the years old thread. And, sure enough, completely pointless post.

To help counteract some people in this forum's proclivity to bump threads from ages past to append a mostly irrelevant and inconsequential copy of another site's post, a "jump to the new post that bumped decade old thread" link would be cool.
That sounds too hard. I don't know.
 
2 years ago you gave the like tag to a 5 year old bump. You just told JP that the bump he gave today (7 years) should have been a new thread instead due to age.

Hence 5 is good, 7 is too long.
That isn’t what she said?
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron