I just hope with so much experience back we start faster out of the blocks next year.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Preseason rankings serve to create hype and draw eyeballs to networks hosting the games; we’ll be 10-15th based on a few bigger brands getting the nod.
Even pollsters aren’t dumb enough to rate a team with a brand new head coach (let alone missing their QB) very high in that first year. Too much transition.
(I think)
The preseason poll this year before seasons got paused had 6/14 (43%) Big 10 teams and 4/10 Big 12 teams.You forget how the AP poll works, there is a requirement that at least 8 Big 10 teams have to be on the list, with 3 or 4 in the top 10.
I will not be surprised if the AP ranks Iowa above us.
People that think Texas will be ranked ahead of us need to take off their tinfoil hat. It isn't happening.
You forget how the AP poll works, there is a requirement that at least 8 Big 10 teams have to be on the list, with 3 or 4 in the top 10.
I will not be surprised if the AP ranks Iowa above us.
Looking at where Texas started and finished in the AP Poll from 2010-2019:
2010 Started:5 Finished:Unranked
2011 Started:24 Finished:Unranked
2012 Started:15 Finished:19
2013 Started:15 Finished:Unranked
2014 Started:Unranked Finished:Unranked
2015 Started:Unranked Finished:Unranked
2016 Started:11 Finished:Unranked
2017 Started:23 Finished:Unranked
2018 Started:23 Finished:9
2019 Started:10 Finished:25
Texas finished ranked, with a bowl win, and a perceived upgrade at the head coaching spot. It won't shock me that AP voters vote Texas higher than us. They're almost always overrated.
This year they started 14th and will end up 16th-17th prob. Disagree that Sarkisian is broadly viewed as an upgrade, nor should he be. And they lose the only player most AP voters could name on UTs roster.
UT is overrated always. But ISU will be picked to finish 2nd in the league and ranked ahead of Texas preseason.
Bold move to hitch Texas’ wagon to Sark. Maybe it will work, but just seems like a less accomplished Tom Herman with more baggage.
LolSark brings in a few big name transfers, maybe from Alabama, and the hype train will be in full swing. We'll see how it plays out.
You mean the one without Mike Rose?Have you noticed the current AP All American Team?
Combined with "the new Texas coach was the OC for 'Bama's historic offense, plus all that Texas talent."The backup for TX played really well in the bowl game. That is enough sample size for the people that vote in polls. Every year it is the same; Texas is back. I expect more of the same. Time will tell.
Or that Texas talent that was a failure as an OC until he had the opponent outmanned by a mile at every position.Combined with "the new Texas coach was the OC for 'Bama's historic offense, plus all that Texas talent."
Peterson has been much better at U Dub, I just think that will be the media's narrative on why Texas is actually going to be back "for real this time guys, we mean it!" It will be stupid and wrong, but that's how they'll justify a top 15 preseason ranking.Or that Texas talent that was a failure as an OC until he had the opponent outmanned by a mile at every position.
He made hay from getting to 7 wins at UW because he got to use the Ty Willingham disaster as his bar. It’s a team that had won a Natty like 20 years earlier. It would be like using the Charlie Strong era to measure success at Texas, but worse. UW was SO much better after Sark left.
The guy is not terrible, and mabye he will be good. But his record doesnt suggest he is an upgrade.
Nope. I mean the one with Mike Rose. And Charlie Kolar. And JaQuan Bailey.You mean the one without Mike Rose?
The only definite teams I see being ahead of us to start next season are Alabama, Ohio State, and Oklahoma. With Book and Lawrence gone, there’s a chance we end up ahead of ND and Clemson to start the season, but I’m not banking on that. After the first three mentioned, the next tier is honestly going to be a huge jumble between Iowa State, Clemson, Notre Dame, Georgia, Texas, UNC (since Howell is only a sophomore), and TAMU. You can probably throw one more school in there that will be overrated or that I’m forgetting about. Based on all of that, I see us anywhere between 4 and 11. I’ll take the middle on that and go with 8 to start the season. Big 12 is going to be tough. We should have four teams ranked to start the season (Oklahoma, Iowa State, Oklahoma State, Texas). Next season is going to be a lot of fun!
After they lose to Indiana? I doubt it.Will they Cy-Hawk game be a a top 15 matchup? Gameday again?