2 ISU FB players have Coronavirus

So if they're infected a 2nd time, and weren't immune the first time, what good does that do?

I was still told to socially distance etc. even with the antibodies and that kind of a thing (immunity) won't be known until well after the football season.

Either way fans (not saying it's you) calling for the team to infect one another just so we can have entertainment is beyond callus; even if they're low risk, they're not video game characters.
So if they're infected a 2nd time, and weren't immune the first time, what good does that do?

I was still told to socially distance etc. even with the antibodies and that kind of a thing (immunity) won't be known until well after the football season.

Either way fans (not saying it's you) calling for the team to infect one another just so we can have entertainment is beyond callus; even if they're low risk, they're not video game characters.

Agreed it is unknown if people who have already had Covid will have immunity based on having the antibodies in their system and how long those antibodies will remain.

My comment relates to our immune system has what I'll term a memory. So if someone has Covid and recovers. Then let's say 6 months later they are infected again.

They may have have antibodies and immunity to prevent getting severe symptoms the 2nd time around.

My OP post was saying, even if antibodies don't exist in our systems 6 months later, our immune system remembers how to create the Covid antibodies. So the person's body will fight off the infection at a faster pace.

I agree is is horrifying to suggest we would want to intentionally infect people. But if a vaccine isn't developed in the next year, we might have adopt an approach more like Sweden.
 
Agreed it is unknown if people who have already had Covid will have immunity based on having the antibodies in their system and how long those antibodies will remain.

My comment relates to our immune system has what I'll term a memory. So if someone has Covid and recovers. Then let's say 6 months later they are infected again.

They may have have antibodies and immunity to prevent getting severe symptoms the 2nd time around.

My OP post was saying, even if antibodies don't exist in our systems 6 months later, our immune system remembers how to create the Covid antibodies. So the person's body will fight off the infection at a faster pace.

I agree is is horrifying to suggest we would want to intentionally infect people. But if a vaccine isn't developed in the next year, we might have adopt an approach more like Sweden.

No one should take Sweden's approach.

The people of Sweden no longer want their approach.

If 80% of the population simply wore a mask in public, the transmission of the virus would stop.

Multiple studies have stated this conclusion.
 
Agreed it is unknown if people who have already had Covid will have immunity based on having the antibodies in their system and how long those antibodies will remain.

My comment relates to our immune system has what I'll term a memory. So if someone has Covid and recovers. Then let's say 6 months later they are infected again.

They may have have antibodies and immunity to prevent getting severe symptoms the 2nd time around.

My OP post was saying, even if antibodies don't exist in our systems 6 months later, our immune system remembers how to create the Covid antibodies. So the person's body will fight off the infection at a faster pace.

I agree is is horrifying to suggest we would want to intentionally infect people. But if a vaccine isn't developed in the next year, we might have adopt an approach more like Sweden.

Huh? We’ve already adopted it. Sweden’s approach is not much different than our current approach. They simply did not reduce activity by govt order at the level their counterpart nations did (it did not work very well given they took nearly the same economic hit and had more deaths and didn’t reduce transmission as well as their peer nations). They certainly did not intentionally infect people.
 
If a vaccine isn't developed, we can't shutdown the world for 6 months each year.

I agree people should be wearing masks in public. It is a very selfish act to not wear a mask.

Yes Sweden would do things differently. But I doubt they would take the US approach either.

Not all countries closed their schools. Would the US consider keeping k-8 or k-12 schools open.

Can some businesses remain open using new protocols? Places where there are fewer customer or one-to-one employee to customer interaction. E.g
Barbers, jewelers, etc.
 
If a vaccine isn't developed, we can't shutdown the world for 6 months each year.

I agree people should be wearing masks in public. It is a very selfish act to not wear a mask.

Yes Sweden would do things differently. But I doubt they would take the US approach either.

Not all countries closed their schools. Would the US consider keeping k-8 or k-12 schools open.

Can some businesses remain open using new protocols? Places where there are fewer customer or one-to-one employee to customer interaction. E.g
Barbers, jewelers, etc.

No one is saying this. Why do people keep throwing this out there?

Wear a mask, problem solved.
 
Are all teams making players sign waivers for COVID acknowledging the risk? If not I’m sure many follow suit now.
 
are teams gonna play each other if players are sick? I doubt it. Unless they put teams in strict quarantine the season won’t last longer than a week.
short of keeping the teams completely quarantined from the outside world, I see no way to keep them from just passing it around to each other.