***Official 2019-2020 Transfer Thread***

allfourcy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 26, 2012
6,950
2,983
113
Are we sure that's a good thing for us?

Yes, two different ways to look at it, right? Opens up a bigger pool of potential immediate eligible players, yet makes it easier for present roster players coming back to explore options. Would imagine if it passes, a lot of programs will be wondering their fate in that regard. Interesting.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
See I don't think its Jackson that Prohm will play at PG if we don't sign one, I think it'll be Bolton. I think the only way Jackson plays PG is if we bring in a couple really good scoring guard/wings. If we don't bring in those type of guys, I think Prohm will want the ball in Bolton's hands as much as possible. Again, I didn't see anything from Jackson that showed he can be a lead guard last season. He looks like a Donovan Jackson type, SG in a PG body.
I’m sure they’ll both get some duties, along with a point forward helping them out. That’s the positive of Jackson, he can be a combo.

Did you see it from NWB his freshman or sophomore years? I saw notably more pg in Jackson than we ever saw in Wigginton and DJ, and Jackson was a freshman without the preparation of those two. He reminded me some of Custer, who likely would have stayed if on a roster with just two other guards, no true pgs, and only bringing in acgrad transfer shooting guards/combo
 

moores2

Well-Known Member
Nov 9, 2018
2,531
1,713
113
32
Nearly everyone is a transfer risk. I don’t think Jackson is too much more than normal.

Is it an elephant in the room? Arguably the opposite. We only have two other guards on the roster! One of which is a freshman who’s likely not ahead and who also has the length to play the wing. Of course we’re looking at guards. Yet, with Jackson as the top pg candidate on the roster, we’re more focused on off guards and scoring guards.

The fact we’re not jumping at offering Buggs or Flowers says they’re comfortable in Jackson at pg. Why would be behind Harris? Jackson has more pathways to starting than Harris imo
rewatching some games from this season. Jackson is going to be an elite defender for the next 3 years even if he doesn't figure his shot out at this level.
 

Cyinthenorth

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2013
15,907
11,984
113
36
Dubuque
Sucks about Kier. That's one I really wanted for us and thought maybe prohm could get us off the snide
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,626
14,428
113
45
Way up there
I’m sure they’ll both get some duties, along with a point forward helping them out. That’s the positive of Jackson, he can be a combo.

Did you see it from NWB his freshman or sophomore years? I saw notably more pg in Jackson than we ever saw in Wigginton and DJ, and Jackson was a freshman without the preparation of those two. He reminded me some of Custer, who likely would have stayed if on a roster with just two other guards, no true pgs, and only bringing in acgrad transfer shooting guards/combo

NWB wasn't here as a fr so its tough to say, as a soph he played behind some of the best players in the history of the program so his role was totally different when he finally saw the floor for extended minutes. As a jr, he only played PG because he had to, remember, UW Milwaukee with Donovan at PG..yikes.He was never an ideal PG but he could get away with it because he was surrounded by guys who could score. Even in 17/18 he had LW and Donovan, two really good offensive players. The other two you compared him to weren't PG's either, both struggled in that role so idk why you bring them up.

I think Jackson could be a band aid in the PG role IF we had other guys around him who could score. If we don't bring those guys in, Prohm will give the job to Bolton, like we saw this season when Tyrese went down. I think if Prohm has scorers, he wants a PG to distribute and manage the game, if not, like we saw with Rasir last year, he'll ask his best guard to handle that role and build the offense around them and the high ball screen.
 

WhoISthis

Well-Known Member
Oct 6, 2010
5,620
3,569
113
1.)NWB wasn't here as a fr so its tough to say, as a soph he played behind some of the best players in the history of the program so his role was totally different when he finally saw the floor for extended minutes. As a jr, he only played PG because he had to, remember, UW Milwaukee with Donovan at PG..yikes.

2.) He was never an ideal PG but he could get away with it because he was surrounded by guys who could score. Even in 17/18 he had LW and Donovan, two really good offensive players.

3.) The other two you compared him to weren't PG's either, both struggled in that role so idk why you bring them up.
1.) I was always high on NWB as a pg. There was talk about NWB being a pg from Prohm well before Milwaukee game!

2.) Given you’re desire to diminish NWB as a pg, I think we’re just viewing what constitutes a (good) pg very differently. You don’t think Jackson being surrounded by better players would have made him better? If you’re using that as a way to diminish NWB, you need to use that as a reason why Jackson is better than what it cursorily seems now. Nearly every pg needs good players and scorers around them!

3.) You’re the one that compared him to DJ! I’m saying your comparison is poor. Jackson has shown more as a pg, despite less preparation to do so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doc

Sigmapolis

Minister of Economy
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 10, 2011
26,953
41,670
113
Waukee
Doubt he could hit a curveball.

It is very bad to take Jobu's rum.

200.gif


Very very bad.
 

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,925
8,418
113
Overland Park
I like the idea of immediately eligible transfers, but it will probably end up ruining college basketball and just lead to “Super Teams” like the NBA has been.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron