NCAA Seeding

cyclonedave25

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 10, 2007
21,243
10,676
113
Chicago, IL
Why not? Drake is the host and the committee allows non-conference rematches (but tries to avoid them).
Technically, the committee can rematch a non-con matchup in the round of 64, but only if they have to. They won’t do it just for yucks. That chances of it happening are less than 1%.
 

CycloneJoe6

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 29, 2012
487
690
93
Iowa
Lunardi's last bracketology has us as a 7 seed in Columbia playing Seton Hall. Would have a 2nd round matchup with Duke :(
 

ZB4CY

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2012
2,801
4,526
113
I'm getting nervous about my prediction of not being below a 6 seed.
 

Halincandenza

Well-Known Member
Oct 24, 2018
9,347
10,231
113
I would bet they get a 6 with their resume and strength of schedule. Some idiots are sliding them down to a 7 or 8 based on the last couple weeks but that is now how they pick seeds.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyclonepride

cloneteach

Well-Known Member
Nov 19, 2009
2,143
481
83
Time for the annual reminder that the importance conference tourney games is not that great, historically. I’ll go on record and say the floor for ISU is a 7-seed, the ceilings a 5, and they’ll need to win at least 2 games to move up from 7.

I’ve beem wrong before (frequently), but the tournament games are generally no more important than the preceding 30.

I get what you are saying and for most conferences I believe this to be true. The unique situation with being in the 4/5 game is that every game will probably be a Quad 1 game. Similar to 2017, if you add three Q1 games, your seed can rise a couple spots in a hurry.
 

DeereClone

Well-Known Member
Nov 16, 2009
8,281
9,648
113
It's funny how worked up some people are about the seeding considering everyone seems to think we aren't going to win another game.

Someone has to predict that we will win to be interested in what seed we are? That makes no sense at all.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: FinalFourCy

awd4cy

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2010
26,335
17,913
113
Central Iowa
I would bet they get a 6 with their resume and strength of schedule. Some idiots are sliding them down to a 7 or 8 based on the last couple weeks but that is now how they pick seeds.
I think it’s perfectly reasonable for a mock draft expert to have us as a 7. Net raking has us at a 6 and they aren’t just going to go down in order picking teams.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FinalFourCy

TheHelgo

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2006
3,705
1,329
113
I'd rather be a 6 than a 5 TBH. I'm convinced the committee tries to keep the 12 vs 5 upsets going as much as possible (or at least make them more competitive than they should). Plus, with a 6, you avoid the 1 Seeds for as long as possible if the team catches fire. Would rather go 11, 3, 2 than 12, 4, 1
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyclonepride

jsb

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 7, 2008
30,557
33,350
113
Someone has to predict that we will win to be interested in what seed we are? That makes no sense at all.

But if we aren't going to win another game, the seed doesn't matter, right? Hell, if we get a 6 or a 7 seed with as garbage as some of you seem to think we are, then you might have to accept that we weren't a terrible team.