TIL that Cousy is still alive.I would agree with you, but Cousy was one of the Voters
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TIL that Cousy is still alive.I would agree with you, but Cousy was one of the Voters
Being one of the best teams in NCAA at not turning the ball over has a lot to do with him. It has also been the only way we have been able to beat some teams that have out-rebounded us by large margins, because we don't lose as many possessions and the other team turns it over substantially more than us. It helps neutralize their rebounding advantage/second chance points.This is not going to end well but I will try. I am NOT trying to cause trouble with this question but has anyone ever wondered if this amazing A/TO ratio is really a great thing? ISU has finished with 8, 9 and 12 losses in Morris' first three years and is at 10 already this year.
Is it possible that avoiding possible turnovers has resulted in Morris not taking some risks that, if successful, might have won him and ISU more games? Is Monte Morris the ncca hoops version of the KC Chiefs Alex Smith in that he won't hurt you by turning it over but kinda hurts you by never risking a turnover?
I swear I am not trying to troll. It is a serious attempt to discuss this as a possibility.
The only way that argument would hold any weight is if, to go along with his extremely low turnover rate, he also didn't have many assists. But there's only one player in the top 5 list who has more assists per game than Monte. It would be like Alex Smith throwing for 4 or 5 TD's every game while not turning it over. In other words, not like Alex Smith in the slightest. But sure you're not trolling.This is not going to end well but I will try. I am NOT trying to cause trouble with this question but has anyone ever wondered if this amazing A/TO ratio is really a great thing? ISU has finished with 8, 9 and 12 losses in Morris' first three years and is at 10 already this year.
Is it possible that avoiding possible turnovers has resulted in Morris not taking some risks that, if successful, might have won him and ISU more games? Is Monte Morris the ncca hoops version of the KC Chiefs Alex Smith in that he won't hurt you by turning it over but kinda hurts you by never risking a turnover?
I swear I am not trying to troll. It is a serious attempt to discuss this as a possibility.
The only way that argument would hold any weight is if, to go along with his extremely low turnover rate, he also didn't have many assists. But there's only one player in the top 5 list who has more assists per game than Monte. It would be like Alex Smith throwing for 4 or 5 TD's every game while not turning it over. In other words, not like Alex Smith in the slightest. But sure you're not trolling.
This is not going to end well but I will try. I am NOT trying to cause trouble with this question but has anyone ever wondered if this amazing A/TO ratio is really a great thing? ISU has finished with 8, 9 and 12 losses in Morris' first three years and is at 10 already this year.
Is it possible that avoiding possible turnovers has resulted in Morris not taking some risks that, if successful, might have won him and ISU more games? Is Monte Morris the ncca hoops version of the KC Chiefs Alex Smith in that he won't hurt you by turning it over but kinda hurts you by never risking a turnover?
I swear I am not trying to troll. It is a serious attempt to discuss this as a possibility.
Yeah, someone like Matt Thomas? Oh wait, he's got 23% more turnovers than Monte this season in 87% of the minutes.Yeah, the only players you typically see with TO rates approaching Monte's are guys that are almost exclusively catch and shoot players. Guys that take maybe 5 dribbles a game.
This is not going to end well but I will try. I am NOT trying to cause trouble with this question but has anyone ever wondered if this amazing A/TO ratio is really a great thing? ISU has finished with 8, 9 and 12 losses in Morris' first three years and is at 10 already this year.
Is it possible that avoiding possible turnovers has resulted in Morris not taking some risks that, if successful, might have won him and ISU more games? Is Monte Morris the ncca hoops version of the KC Chiefs Alex Smith in that he won't hurt you by turning it over but kinda hurts you by never risking a turnover?
I swear I am not trying to troll. It is a serious attempt to discuss this as a possibility.
Here is the link if you want to share your feelings with them.
http://www.hoophall.com/about/get-touch/contact-us/
That is great! I want one. Can I get one?
No royalties, just have to make me a shirt.I think I may see if I can get a shirt made with this to wear in KC this week.
Read your earlier argument about how their job is to win games and think about it.Trent Dilfer? Eh, yeah, that wasn't me.
Because he was recognized. The following year's NCAA record book listed Monte as the record holder:Alright, those stats aren't a good representation of Assist/TO ratio, but still fair
Zierden - 26 assists to 4 turnovers in 304 minutes
Mason - 74 assists to 13 turnovers in 25 games
Monte - 134 to 27 turnovers
Not sure why I remember so vividly Monte getting a plaque after his freshman year for breaking the NCAA assist to turnover ratio record?
Yeah, the minimum of 3 assists is what I was remembering. Thanks for postingBecause he was recognized. The following year's NCAA record book listed Monte as the record holder:
http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/2015/DivI.pdf
Page 3.