Pollard loves it here and has done a great job. He's not going anywhere.
I agree the only way Jamie is leaving is when President Leath or his successor Prez FIRES Jamie...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pollard loves it here and has done a great job. He's not going anywhere.
I get the feeling that most think JP will fire CPR at the end of the year. I'm not so sure. Do we need a poll on what he'll do?
I think Jamie has done wonders for ISU from a "ground up" standpoint. Facilities are certainly improved, there is increased passion about the program, we have had a great run in basketball. I think it's safe to say basketball is still in good hands. Plus we are still in the Big 12 and realizing the financial windfalls from that. He needs to make a football change and I believe he will.
My only complaint is with his ego. I can't think of many places (maybe Wisconsin with Alvarez) where the AD puts himself out there as the face of the athletic department more. Puts himself in commercials, posters. He's active in a not-always good way on Twitter. We get screwed on a call-he grabs the mike. Takes jabs at Iowa all the time. Plus gets pretty defensive and goes on the attack whenever there's criticism. That kind of thing. Most AD's act behind the scenes and let credit on the field stay in the hands of the guys on the field/court.
That said, I agree with many posters here in saying I don't think we would have any idea how good he is/was until he was gone. I don't think he goes anywhere, including Wisconsin. I think he knows he has a pretty good thing here.
1. You are arguing chicken vs egg.
2. Do you really believe that the Reiman or the Sukup's dedication to the University is due in large part to Jamie Pollard or to the fact that they love Iowa State University, and any other person that was in the same position could have facilitated their donations similarly?
3. If anyone else with similar qualifications could have done the same job, then someone didn't do an "outstanding job." They just did their job.
Nope just doing his job, no big deal. Geesh, I'd hate to have some of you on here as my supervisor.
He is reimbursed appropriately for doing what he has been asked to do. I am sure you are in a similar situation at your job. People seem to think he also deserves high praise for doing something he was expected to do. Do you think you deserve high praise for creating Widget A as expected?
Great point. BVDV accomplished much less in regards to increasing revenue, increasing attendance, and improving facilities. And he was only given the best seasons in school history in football and basketball to work with.
Not derailing, but I seem to remember BVDV having to deal with some budget messes left over by Gene Smith? I seem to recall a line of reasoning that we wanted an "administrator" in the most bueracratic sense of the word to right the financial ship. Not defending - just trying to remember what circumstances he fell into.
Not derailing, but I seem to remember BVDV having to deal with some budget messes left over by Gene Smith? I seem to recall a line of reasoning that we wanted an "administrator" in the most bueracratic sense of the word to right the financial ship. Not defending - just trying to remember what circumstances he fell into.
BVDV did some good things while he was here, his handling of the LE mess was apparently his undoing. That issue was a hot potato with no good solution, however LE himself said it was best he left Ames. But BVDV won a national award for A.D. of the year while he was here, so obviously he wasn't the chump some try to make him out to be.
Lets look at it this way. This might be a stretch but I will go for it.
You own two stores, A and B. These two stores each have 1 sales person, A and B respectively. For every person that comes in the store these sales people can either 1) Make this person spend 0% of what they planned to spend 2) Make this person spend 50% of what they planned to spend 3) Make this person spend 100% of what they planned to spend or 4) Spend 200% of what they planned to spend.
The average person that goes into store A plans to spend $200. The average person leaves the store with $200 worth of product.
The average person that goes into store B plans to spend $25 dollars. The average person leaves the store with $50 worth of product.
Who is the better sales person?
Even if sales person A only got people to spend 50% of what they planned to spend, store A still outperforms store B. Regardless, sales person B is clearly the better sales person but outside factors have made store A appear more successful.
Soooo.....point is that it is basically impossible to compare JP to previous AD's because outside factors are so incredibly different now than they were then that you can never really come to an accurate conclusion. I also don't know if JP is the 50%, 100%, or 200% guy, and quite frankly neither do you. My opinion is that he is somewhere in the 50 - 100% and thus I do not feel he deserves any praise.
Regarding your "I understand you're unhappy with CPR, but you're basically saying Jamie has simply done the minimum requirement over the past decade, and that's horse ****." comment, I just don't think he has proven he deserves to conduct a coaching search without outside help and doesn't deserve final say once the search has concluded and we are between a few candidates.
Didn't BVD turn down a bowl bid at a school in Louisiana? Maybe I'm misremembering.
Because how much you spend on recruiting directly correlates to the recruit you can attract???????Pollard has solid credentials in being an AD and businessman. Just look at the facilities and the money he has brought to Iowa State. He has experience in being the President of the entire 1A Athletics Directors Association (Immediate Past President now). His main issue for me is not hiring the right football coach.
The other issue is ISU does not pay coaches incredibly well compared to the rest of the B12.
Football coach salaries, benefits, bonuses paid by university*
1. Mack Brown (resigned Dec.)/Charlie Strong - football - $7,723,067
2. Bob Stoops, Oklahoma: $5,533,882
3. Gary Patterson, Texas Christian: $4,008,150
4. Mike Gundy, Oklahoma State: $3,196,606
5. Dana Holgorsen, West Virginia: $3,180,788
6. Art Briles, Baylor: $3,135,146
7. Bill Snyder, Kansas State: $2,987,038
8. Charlie Weis, Kansas (since fired): $2,566,662
9. Kliff Klingsbury, Texas Tech: $2,270,928
10. Paul Rhoads, Iowa State: $1,837,627
Football recruiting spending*
1. Oklahoma: $880,541
2. Texas Tech: $751,027
3. Iowa State: $644,213
4. Texas: $594,124
5. Kansas: $577,432
6. West Virginia: $448,540
7. Kansas State: $445,603
8. Oklahoma State: $203,622
So the players should be there with all that money spent recruiting, just the coach isn’t at the same level of competency.
Get what you pay for? *2013-14 Data
Pollard is a lot like Dan McCarney to me.
He increased ISU's profile and did a ton of good here. But we're seeing diminishing returns constantly. He's become so arrogant and out of touch, that he routinely inserts himself needlessly into dialogues and only serves to embarrass the university. Ranting about transfers with G Mac. Ranting about the officials with Rhoads last year. Allegedly nickle-and-diming the successful coaches he's hired (Sanderson and Hoiberg) while vehemently defending/refusing to fire under-performers in Rhoads and McDermott. This lends credence to the accusation in the Hines piece that he became jealous of Hoiberg.
Pollard has done more than any AD in ISU history, but that doesn't mean he's still doing the kind of job this university deserves. I fear he still thinks of us as "the little school on the prairie" and apparently some of you do to.
Because how much you spend on recruiting directly correlates to the recruit you can attract???????
The people who are calling for the firing of JP need to calm the F down. Yes, he needs to wake up and get rid of CPR but other than that he has been one of the best things to happen to ISU athletics. I would hate to see him leave.
Pollard is a lot like Dan McCarney to me.
He increased ISU's profile and did a ton of good here. But we're seeing diminishing returns constantly. He's become so arrogant and out of touch, that he routinely inserts himself needlessly into dialogues and only serves to embarrass the university. Ranting about transfers with G Mac. Ranting about the officials with Rhoads last year. Allegedly nickle-and-diming the successful coaches he's hired (Sanderson and Hoiberg) while vehemently defending/refusing to fire under-performers in Rhoads and McDermott. This lends credence to the accusation in the Hines piece that he became jealous of Hoiberg.
Pollard has done more than any AD in ISU history, but that doesn't mean he's still doing the kind of job this university deserves. I fear he still thinks of us as "the little school on the prairie" and apparently some of you do to.