Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've never heard of any rift between Hoiberg and Pollard, but if that's the case Pollard needs to get bent. The only rift between Pollard and Hoiberg should be how long it takes Pollard to say "Yes sir".
I agree but it sounds like that might only happen if we can get a longer term commitment from Fred.
This. Make Fred a good, fair offer for both parties without hanging donors and Jamie out to dry. If Fred says no, then so be it and move on.There's no point to having him coach one more year. The donors are right - get a commitment or move on.
I think it's interesting Pollard doesn't want to propose a higher NBA buyout. Would the buyout really limit Fred's ability to move to the NBA? At the very least it'd be nice to get a few bucks when he does go and a way to help us out a bit financially.
I don't get paying him more for another year either, if he's waiting on the twolves he'll wait at the same pay.
Thank you, Jeremy! If money is a factor let's make it happen. Get a "Keep Hoiberg in Ames" campaign going. 50 K plus fans throw in a $100 a piece boom there is a 5 million bonus for you Fred. Your twins are set for life.
- Some are leery of a strong push for Hornacek due to past tension between him and other players, coaches, donors. This would be interesting to see unfold moving forward.
Most likely, the reason is that dumping a big NBA buyout into the contract would be something Hoiberg is unlikely to accept. Think about it: if you want to go to the NBA, but aren't sure when if you're given the choice to go now or you have to pay a lot of money if you go in the future it's going to push you to want to go now.
I was originally on the "one more year" bandwagon, but I'm not sure now. If this whole situation had never happened and Hoiberg had just coached at ISU for 6 years, taking us deep into the tournament on year 6 and then left, I think most people would be OK with it. That's the idea behind one more year, that he might be able to take us deep in the tournament and leave the program at the height of success rather than after a disappointment. On the other hand, if you are 100% leaving after one more year then what's the point?