Then when he leaves, you should be on here defending that stance.
You see dollars in a contract, the reality is he's brought that to the university ten fold.
So if we lose him because of unwillingness to compensate him at market value determined by what people are willing to pay, I expect you, and stormin to be here arguing it's ok to go back to McDermott era quality, because it's affordable.
Again, I'm not saying he doesn't deserve a raise (check my previous posts). I'm saying we shouldn't just give him the keys to our vault. We can't compete with the NBA. So if he wants to go, he will go and there won't be anything we can do about it. We cannot pay $5 million per year or anywhere close to that. Our advantage is the length and total $$$ of a deal.
There is no way Hoiberg brings back 10-fold what he is paid. Not even close. He will average $2 mil under his current contract, you think he brings $20 million to the AD? The information I found was a few years old but Kentucky brought in a total of $14 mil. Kansas $15 mil. Duke $11.8 mil. Iowa State? $6.2 mil. That certainly has grown since 2010-11 but not exponentially.
http://money.cnn.com/2010/03/18/news/companies/basketball_profits/
http://businessofcollegesports.com/2011/12/20/big-xii-financials-10-11/
10-fold? Not even close.
We can't emotionally spend and throw money at coaches because they've had a sweet 16 run. That would be fiscally irresponsible of the AD. I'm confident Hoiberg will be taken care of but it shouldn't be by throwing a blank check at him.