TX fires Herman

??? He took over a Washington program that was the worst in the Pac-12, didn't win a game the year before he got there - and he turned it around.
Went 9-4 his first year at USC then was fired early in the second. Uh, yeah, he won.
Great hire by Texas. Much better situation than either Wash or USC.
9-4 isn't winning by Texas standards. That's not going to cut it. It will be all about conference titles and beating Oklahoma. If he can't do either of those things, he'll be gone.
 
I'd bet, for better or worse, being Saban's staff as OC improved Sark's attractiveness to Texas.

I am sure that helps.

I think the other truth is that Texas is not a top tier coaching destination any longer. Not at the Alabama, ND, tOSU level at least. Too much baggage. They have to take a risk or two.
 
I also don’t think USC ever gave him a fair chance to get things going. A year and a half? Really?
 


I know he had a few issues here too. Guy might have just pissed off one too many people.

This is what happens when you have 5 star guys and a dysfunctional culture. What is the AD’s status? Got to start looking at his leadership.

Wonder if UT saved some $$ by not doing this on 1/1 or earlier (contract retention clauses).

They (UT) keep doing the same things (hire assistants from successful programs) and expecting different results. With their resources, you would think they can open up the checkbook and write a heavy eight figure check to a major name. Apparently this is not the case, which further explains how screwed up their culture really is.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: motorcy90
9-4 isn't winning by Texas standards. That's not going to cut it. It will be all about conference titles and beating Oklahoma. If he can't do either of those things, he'll be gone.

Agreed. Washington isn't the standard; USC is. And his tenure at USC makes this hire head-scratching.
 
I think Sark is a fine coach. He's got some demons, to be sure, but he's not terrible. I guess I don't see him as an upgrade over what they already had. It feels like we're going to be going through this exact same song and dance in 4 years. The money is shocking, but only because we're not Texas. Money doesn't mean the same thing to them.

I learned this from the Bugs Bunny cartoon Oily Hare decades ago....."There ain't no holes in Texas that ain't a gushing oil!"

And I still call Dallas "Dollars, Texas".

1609608760110.png
 
I'm with the Surly Horns board: this is a huge roll of the dice for a $24M buyout, but apparently, sounds like a lot of UT folks hated Tom Herman so probably more a wanting to get rid of TH than wanting Sark.
 
I think Sark is a good choice but not the long term answer they need. UT's issues are off the field, locker room type of things. I don't think he's a big risk, he'll keep them as relevant as Herman but I don't see a huge upside.
 
This is what happens when you have 5 star guys and a dysfunctional culture. What is the AD’s status? Got to start looking at his leadership.

Wonder if UT saved some $$ by not doing this on 1/1 or earlier (contract retention clauses).

They (UT) keep doing the same things (hire assistants from successful programs) and expecting different results. With their resources, you would think they can open up the checkbook and write a heavy eight figure check to a major name. Apparently this is not the case, which further explains how screwed up their culture really is.

Charlie Strong was the head coach that led a pre-ACC Louisville to a Sugar Bowl win, and Texas hired him away the year after that. The problem is Strong was never going to be given what he needed nor allowed to change what he needed in order to win at Texas.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron