Thoughts on next year?

I like that Heacock has a full off season and knows what we need to fix. It’s not like we had any games in the last half of the season that we somehow got lucky and stopped the run and covered up the problem.
 
He is our best backer (maybe Brezina has him but we haven’t had a good enough look at him) but it’s our weak link. Sadowsky was our middle backer most of last year, bacon was an outsider. This year he was moved to inside.
I thought Bacon played inside last year subbing in for Sadowsky early and getting more and more snaps by the end of the year. Pretty sure most of his play was at MLB unless they used him to rush off the edge. One thing I think Bacon needs to improve on is his pass coverage, but he really hasn’t played a ton of snaps yet.
 
A summary of this thread is impossible, but I'll take a shot, anyway.

First, 2024 - Offense - Almost half of Mouser's calls were bad this year, but we overcame them with players with mediocre talent, with poor coaching, and with lousy game management at the end of halves to get to 11 wins.
Defense - conventional wisdom is that, as the injuries mounted, Heacock did it with smoke and mirrors. I buy the theory that there was really only one defender on the field, the rest were MechDyne holograms. Hence, the need to outscore the opponent. With a real defense, we can win without outscoring the opponent.

Looking forward: Offense - There is one sure starter next year - QB Rocco Brecht. RBs - the good ones are too slow; the fast ones are not good. WRs - returners plus the new transfers = maybe 1/2 starters. TEs - there are a couple all-conference guys in this group, but they will be hurt all year. The ones that can play can't block and wear boxing gloves to catch with. OL - If Clanton works 18-hour days and takes no vacation time until Ireland, the line will be average - again.

Defense - DL - since it is too difficult to recruit good d-linemen, we should switch to a scheme that requires more of them. LBs - the room is full of 2nd and 3rd stringers. In addition to the training table, LBs should be made to each eat a large pizza every day. The ones that gain the most weight become d-linemeen. The others play LB but are slow to their gaps and tackle poorly. DBs/Safeties - there are some good young players in this group, but they are all slow. Maybe we can use a scheme that compensates for that - like . . . a 3-3-5?

Given that outlook, we will either win the Big 12 outright and go to the CFP or we will win enough games to play a bowl game in Memphis . . . against Memphis.

Postscript: Thanks Team 133. Forever.
 
We might have those guys on the roster
  • Easton Miller 6'1" 230lbs Ankeny RS-Frosh
  • AJ Peterson 6'1" 235lbs Long Grove RS-Frosh
  • Charlie Whelpley 6'2" 220lbs Batavia, IL Frosh
Plus there are 10 guys in the TE room. I think we can find blocking FB or HB. Heck if James Neal doesn't end up being a starting OL, there's a JUMBO blocker.
Yes, the point is this is a desire position much more than a skill position. A great hs 6’1 DE or a 6’2 TE can step into this spot and be a major college contributor. We can all remember we had a a fantastic dual threat QB (Walling) from DM East that turned out to be a game changer at gunner. Iowa isn’t blessed with a long list of D1 prospects. When you can create a niche position were you can get a solid contributor from guys that aren’t traditional D1 recruits you’re winning in the margins.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isucy86
Don't feel the staff must replace the Klotz role. We'll just see 2 TE formations and we have 2 really talented TE's returning in Brahmer and Burkle. And Moore has shown some ability when healthy. Plus the staff has recruited a pretty deep TE room.

I feel like Stevo's created his playing time vs. the staff really being focused on wanting a FB to get X snaps a game. We'll see, there are some big RB's on the roster who could develop into the next Stevo: Easton Miller, Charley Whelpley and AJ Peterson.
There’s am awful lot of discussion on this, considering that the staff recruited Keaton Roskop specifically for the role. As mentioned before, Tyler Moore will likely fill the starting spot this Fall.

I can see reasonably well today, for the first time in weeks. Enough to actually catch up on threads.

On page four of this one, some good entertainment value so far. :grin:
 
  • Like
Reactions: nrg4isu
247 has an article today ranking Big 12 schedules. ISU has the 3rd most difficult schedule out of 16 teams. So, just another year as usual.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: StPaulCyclone
Didn't they steal our defensive coach before?

No, but Freeman wanted Heacock badly. I'm not sure if it was when he was hired or the second year. But they targeted him and I'm pretty sure Heacock talked with them and decided to stay here.

My guess is that it's less likely this time just because he is that much closer to retirement (frankly I'm sort of surprised he's still around). But maybe that would make him more likely to stay.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron