RECRUITING: Elijah Brown visit info

rholtgraves

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2009
11,201
6,751
113
Brown will be a tough get with Oregon and Gonzaga in the mix. Gonzaga could be a threat to make it to the championship game again if Williams Goss comes back.
 

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,925
8,418
113
Overland Park
It will be fun to bump these threads the next two years and see that people don't have Lewis in their starting line ups. he gone be good.

You really think Lewis is going to be a day one starter if we add two or three more guys to can play right away? Niang and Morris weren't even day one starters.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,626
14,428
113
45
Way up there
Once these dominoes start falling its going to get interesting, there are a lot of the same names in on the big transfers. It could get chaotic when guys start committing as lots of offers will be impacted by each commitment. With such a deep group, teams will be looking to 2nd, 3rd, 4th choices etc.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: rholtgraves

Bryce7

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2016
3,044
949
63
Let's oversign...say take six of them...they ll look good. I remember the days in 2012 when the bench was not good and in-house people were picking walk on schollies. It would be amazing t have 4 qualifies people on scholarships. Juiston and the Lawsons and Edwards would be great.
 

bozclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Nov 18, 2011
5,710
8,593
113
Indiana
We need players and we need competition. I am really excited about our team next year, but there are a ton of unknowns. We have no returning all Americans and as we have seen there is not guarantee a player will make an immediate impact. It would be nice to pick and choose, but I think it is important to fill the roster with guys we think can play at this level. At that point, let everyone compete for minutes.
 

Thomasrickj

Well-Known Member
Feb 26, 2012
7,871
5,773
113
Arlington, VA
Brown, Shayok and Edwards plus Juiston would be a home run spring recruiting period IMO. Put 110% of your effort into Race Thompson for 2018 to cover the void missed by not getting Morrow or a different sit-out big.

2017 Starters: Jackson, Brown, Edwards, Juiston, Young
2018 Starters: Wigginton, Edwards, Shayok, Juiston, Young

Even looking at those starters I'm discounting Lard, Babb and freshman Wigginton. Those teams would be set-up to make it into the Tournament for a lot of years to come.
You didn't even mention Lewis in he discussion of possible starters. I think you're underestimating Lewis's talent and abilities.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,626
14,428
113
45
Way up there
Yes. All day.

That lineup has talent but its TINY...even by the small ball standards we're used to. If you have Jackson and Wigginton on the floor together, it'd be nice to have a Babb like player at the 3 but with your lineup, it would give the option to bring in Babb, Lewis or Long off the bench so we'd still have 3 good sized kids at the 2/3 off the bench, so that would be great as well. That would give Prohm a lot of flexibility with matchups.
 

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
10,440
10,163
113
41
That lineup has talent but its TINY...even by the small ball standards we're used to. If you have Jackson and Wigginton on the floor together, it'd be nice to have a Babb like player at the 3 but with your lineup, it would give the option to bring in Babb, Lewis or Long off the bench so we'd still have 3 good sized kids at the 2/3 off the bench, so that would be great as well. That would give Prohm a lot of flexibility with matchups.
Tiny? It's just as large as most of our past 6, if not arguably larger with a true post in Young and a long, athletic Juiston who will be a plus rebounder. I'm sure there will be times when Wigginton or Jackson are subbed out in favor of Babb or Lewis, but still. I don't see there being much a functional difference between a 6'2" guard and a 6'3" or 6'4" guard, particularly when Wigginton is a much better athlete than Morris, Naz, or Matt
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,626
14,428
113
45
Way up there
Tiny? It's just as large as most of our past 6, if not arguably larger with a true post in Young and a long, athletic Juiston who will be a plus rebounder. I'm sure there will be times when Wigginton or Jackson are subbed out in favor of Babb or Lewis, but still.

Wigginton and Jackson would be the two smallest guard pair we've started this decade, not to mention two of the shortest guards we've had period. Lucious is the only shorter starter during the Fred/CSP eras. Nader, Niang, Ejim, Hogue, McKay, and BDJ are all bigger/equal to and just as/if not more athletic than the guys we will start at their positions. Burton may be the only exception. I'm not saying that lineup won't work, its just a fact its very small, smaller than teams we've had get abuse on the glass.
 

rholtgraves

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2009
11,201
6,751
113
Tiny? It's just as large as most of our past 6, if not arguably larger with a true post in Young and a long, athletic Juiston who will be a plus rebounder. I'm sure there will be times when Wigginton or Jackson are subbed out in favor of Babb or Lewis, but still. I don't see there being much a functional difference between a 6'2" guard and a 6'3" or 6'4" guard, particularly when Wigginton is a much better athlete than Morris, Naz, or Matt

Actually it would be one of the smaller teams.
 

BryceC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 23, 2006
26,471
19,648
113
Wigginton and Jackson would be the two smallest guard pair we've started this decade, not to mention two of the shortest guards we've had period. Lucious is the only shorter starter during the Fred/CSP eras. Nader, Niang, Ejim, Hogue, McKay, and BDJ are all bigger/equal to and just as/if not more athletic than the guys we will start at their positions. Burton may be the only exception. I'm not saying that lineup won't work, its just a fact its very small, smaller than teams we've had get abuse on the glass.

And? Rarely do guards get a ton of rebounds. We didn't get killed on the glass this year because our guards weren't agressive enough rebounders.
 

FinalFourCy

Well-Known Member
Mar 5, 2017
10,440
10,163
113
41
Actually it would be one of the smaller teams.
Functionally, no.

Young and Juiston would be a bigger than a lot of our frontcourts, Brown a wash on the wing, and Wigginton and Jackson a bit smaller in the backcourt. You don't measure the size of your lineup by your pg.
 

WIB

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 2, 2010
2,126
2,730
113
Ames
At the moment the dream line up for next season in my opinion is
Jackson- 6'2 (not actually)
Wigginton- 6'2
Brown- 6'4
Juiston- 6'7
Solomon- 6'8

That's not really that small. Last year we went 6'2, 6'4, 6'4, 6'5, 6'8.

Not to mention we could bring Lard and Kosango off the bench who are both 6'9 or so. Obviously I don't know what we would get from either one.
 

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,626
14,428
113
45
Way up there
And? Rarely do guards get a ton of rebounds. We didn't get killed on the glass this year because our guards weren't agressive enough rebounders.

Our guards were actually really good rebounders last year, Morris, Thomas and Naz all got 4-ish a game, it kept us in a lot of games. Without that production we would have been in serious trouble. So maybe we didn't get killed bc of our guards but you can argue things would have been much worse without that production from them. We were able to play small because we had guards that held their own, Brown could be that type of a guy but I'm not sure about Jackson or Wigginton.
 

Latest posts

Help Support Us

Become a patron