People not having TL in their starting line-up doesn't mean they don't think he'll be good.It will be fun to bump these threads the next two years and see that people don't have Lewis in their starting line ups. he gone be good.
It will be fun to bump these threads the next two years and see that people don't have Lewis in their starting line ups. he gone be good.
Great info. Does Edwards recruitment change anything on him or are they both takes?
No. You take them both. Same with Juiston. Last spot goes to a sit out. You take another sit out guy if we miss on a guard.
You didn't even mention Lewis in he discussion of possible starters. I think you're underestimating Lewis's talent and abilities.Brown, Shayok and Edwards plus Juiston would be a home run spring recruiting period IMO. Put 110% of your effort into Race Thompson for 2018 to cover the void missed by not getting Morrow or a different sit-out big.
2017 Starters: Jackson, Brown, Edwards, Juiston, Young
2018 Starters: Wigginton, Edwards, Shayok, Juiston, Young
Even looking at those starters I'm discounting Lard, Babb and freshman Wigginton. Those teams would be set-up to make it into the Tournament for a lot of years to come.
Would you go with Jackson, Wigginton, Brown, Juiston, Young then?
Yes. All day.
Tiny? It's just as large as most of our past 6, if not arguably larger with a true post in Young and a long, athletic Juiston who will be a plus rebounder. I'm sure there will be times when Wigginton or Jackson are subbed out in favor of Babb or Lewis, but still. I don't see there being much a functional difference between a 6'2" guard and a 6'3" or 6'4" guard, particularly when Wigginton is a much better athlete than Morris, Naz, or MattThat lineup has talent but its TINY...even by the small ball standards we're used to. If you have Jackson and Wigginton on the floor together, it'd be nice to have a Babb like player at the 3 but with your lineup, it would give the option to bring in Babb, Lewis or Long off the bench so we'd still have 3 good sized kids at the 2/3 off the bench, so that would be great as well. That would give Prohm a lot of flexibility with matchups.
Tiny? It's just as large as most of our past 6, if not arguably larger with a true post in Young and a long, athletic Juiston who will be a plus rebounder. I'm sure there will be times when Wigginton or Jackson are subbed out in favor of Babb or Lewis, but still.
Tiny? It's just as large as most of our past 6, if not arguably larger with a true post in Young and a long, athletic Juiston who will be a plus rebounder. I'm sure there will be times when Wigginton or Jackson are subbed out in favor of Babb or Lewis, but still. I don't see there being much a functional difference between a 6'2" guard and a 6'3" or 6'4" guard, particularly when Wigginton is a much better athlete than Morris, Naz, or Matt
Wigginton and Jackson would be the two smallest guard pair we've started this decade, not to mention two of the shortest guards we've had period. Lucious is the only shorter starter during the Fred/CSP eras. Nader, Niang, Ejim, Hogue, McKay, and BDJ are all bigger/equal to and just as/if not more athletic than the guys we will start at their positions. Burton may be the only exception. I'm not saying that lineup won't work, its just a fact its very small, smaller than teams we've had get abuse on the glass.
Functionally, no.Actually it would be one of the smaller teams.
And? Rarely do guards get a ton of rebounds. We didn't get killed on the glass this year because our guards weren't agressive enough rebounders.