Recruit Lists v2.0

IAStubborn

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,380
623
113
He's a good get and will be a good player for them, but let's not pretend like he's a top 20 talent. We have bench players and players that have transferred out from lack of playing time that were ranked higher. Will he be good? Yes, I think so. Would I take him? Yes. Is he Rashad Vaughn, Diallo, Bridges, etc? No.
He's a great get. He is a guy who will probably put in 3 years.too unlike a top 20 kid, by far the best recruit Iowa has signed in a generation imo. Makes their class a top 15.
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
Huge get for the Hawks can we close down the embarrassing Iowa recruiting thread now

That thread is gold. They just went 4 years without a top 150 recruit (which is unheard of for a P5 program) and we'll still have a better class this year with a brand new coach. Why would you want that thread closed?
 

isu81

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2013
2,430
1,673
113
He's a great get. He is a guy who will probably put in 3 years.too unlike a top 20 kid, by far the best recruit Iowa has signed in a generation imo. Makes their class a top 15.
They will have at least one top 100 guy in 4 straight classes.
 

cyrocksmypants

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2008
91,284
89,027
113
Washington DC
He's a great get. He is a guy who will probably put in 3 years.too unlike a top 20 kid, by far the best recruit Iowa has signed in a generation imo. Makes their class a top 15.

I guess we'll just have to wait and see. I think the kids got some size and is talented, but I've also seen the job Fran does in "developing" his top talent he brings in.
 

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,924
8,413
113
Overland Park
And to think that there was a decent size contingency on here not very happy when Otz came back and claimed he was overrated with his recruiting.

Not a single person was against him coming back. I was very much against him being the HC, and said I would rather have Prohm and keep Otz as an assistant, which people like you were against because you wanted Otz as the HC.
 

IAStubborn

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,380
623
113
Iowa is not going to have a top 15 class
well it projected as #15 a couple days ago but a few other teams moved up farther. It won't hold top 25 I agree. But they are the #20 team right now and we will still be behind them even with Long fwiw.
 

baagoe

Well-Known Member
Mar 27, 2015
4,596
4,477
113
well it projected as #15 a couple days ago but a few other teams moved up farther. It won't hold top 25 I agree. But they are the #20 team right now and we will still be behind them even with Long fwiw.
Personally I'd take a class of Malou, Jackson, Young & Long over one of Cook, Kriener, Pemsl & Bohannon.
 

acgclone

Well-Known Member
Feb 21, 2007
12,037
3,769
113
well it projected as #15 a couple days ago but a few other teams moved up farther. It won't hold top 25 I agree. But they are the #20 team right now and we will still be behind them even with Long fwiw.

It's better than what they've been doing in recent years, but I'd take our class over theirs any day.

And that doesn't even count the 1-2 transfers that we'll likely add in the spring.
 

IAStubborn

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,380
623
113
They will have at least one top 100 guy in 4 straight classes.
Who since Woodbury? I am assuming he is better than Woodbury/Gesssel. And they had a long dryspell before that. 17 class and beyond is a long way off so I won't speculate on those yet.
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
well it projected as #15 a couple days ago but a few other teams moved up farther. It won't hold top 25 I agree. But they are the #20 team right now and we will still be behind them even with Long fwiw.

They're top 25 now because they have 4 recruits, they'll slide as other teams add players. Their average recruit is an 88, ours is 90. We'll end up ahead and they'll finish in the 30-40 range
 

IAStubborn

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,380
623
113
That thread is gold. They just went 4 years without a top 150 recruit (which is unheard of for a P5 program) and we'll still have a better class this year with a brand new coach. Why would you want that thread closed?
They have #20 we have #28. Even with Long we won't surpass them per class calculator. TCook has a great composite rating. Sure with transfers we may end up having a better class but it won't be ranked higher unless our guys all blow up.
 

Nycclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 24, 2010
1,324
564
113
45
Cuz it's a 12k post thread interacting with a really stupid troll. . . My thought would be close then reopen after their first pathetic non conference loss. Which could very well be this year looking at the six freshmen they are trying to break in.

That thread is gold. They just went 4 years without a top 150 recruit (which is unheard of for a P5 program) and we'll still have a better class this year with a brand new coach. Why would you want that thread closed?
 

IAStubborn

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,380
623
113
They're top 25 now because they have 4 recruits, they'll slide as other teams add players. Their average recruit is an 88, ours is 90. We'll end up ahead and they'll finish in the 30-40 range
That isn't how it works (our average will be higher but our rank still less) and I say explicitly they will not finish top 25 (for the reason you mention) so not sure what your point is. We will also be in the around 35-40 range unless we add some unknown stud.
 

Nycclone

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 24, 2010
1,324
564
113
45
I did the 247class projection today and it put them in at around 19 or 20. Keep in mind there are still a lot of names on the board, they have no more scholarships and we have three.

well it projected as #15 a couple days ago but a few other teams moved up farther. It won't hold top 25 I agree. But they are the #20 team right now and we will still be behind them even with Long fwiw.
 

IAStubborn

Well-Known Member
Aug 16, 2012
7,380
623
113
Personally I'd take a class of Malou, Jackson, Young & Long over one of Cook, Kriener, Pemsl & Bohannon.

Me too, but theirs will be ranked higher. But outside of our Monte and Thomas class that is normal and look how that's worked out for them.
 

CyTwins

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2010
80,179
65,792
113
Ankeny
That isn't how it works (our average will be higher but our rank still less) and I say explicitly they will not finish top 25 (for the reason you mention) so not sure what your point is. We will also be in the around 35-40 range unless we add some unknown stud.

We have 3 scholarships left to fill so a lot can happen. Composite rankings are weird with JUCOs. 247 has Malou a 93 and Cook a 92 but Malou doesn't get a composite bump. I still think we'll have a top 25 class on Rivals or 247 when it's all said and done