Could you post a 10 year average? That'd be a better comparison.Was posted earlier but here it is again: (Iowa State's viewership was 881,000)
View attachment 115531
Could you post a 10 year average? That'd be a better comparison.Was posted earlier but here it is again: (Iowa State's viewership was 881,000)
View attachment 115531
GT and Cuse are among the worst ACC teams. They have no fans. that chart is wrong. no way cuse or gt have more eyeballs than VT.GT and Cuse will never be in the B12. I dont get your hard on for them.
This means nothing. They bring no added value.Was posted earlier but here it is again: (Iowa State's viewership was 881,000)
View attachment 115531
Agree, the op is someone who got banned and was sitting on this handle for a long time.GT and Cuse are among the worst ACC teams. They have no fans. that chart is wrong. no way cuse or gt have more eyeballs than VT.
there is a reason bowls love VT, and hate GT and Cuse. GT is in Atlanta, but no one in Atlanta follows GT.
VT and NC State are huge markets in huge states. Plus DC if we get VT.
2022 must be an outlier if bc cuse and gt are not at the bottom with Duke and WF>
This means their next AD will be a real make-or-break hire. I was hoping Goetz would get it since she had done a great job out here at Ball U. but the next AD is gonna have a bunch of big decisions to make to keep their football and basketball relevant.For comparison, Iowa is $50-$100M in revenue apart from their elite peers in the Big 10 and are no longer able to hide in the Big 10 West... Versus ISU who will have an easier path to the playoff, is on equal footing to their peers, and has a basketball program HEAD AND SHOULDERS in a better position..
Are we in a better position than Iowa??
Ohio St, Michigan, Penn St, USC, Oregon are all above Iowa (Assuming for USC). The peers below but close to them are Wisconsin, Washington, and Illinois. Wisconsin has been a LARGE step better than Iowa for awhile. Washington is located in a MAJOR MSA and has double the endowment. That puts Iowa at 8/16 in my pecking order with a 70 year old football coach and a 65 year old basketball coach that no one likes...
VT is a LONG ways from DC (4.5 hours). It's a stretch to say we get that market.Plus DC if we get VT.
I really think they are going to regret this move, Texas will as well but they don’t have anything to lose.I also think Oklahoma has a good chance to be a loser in realignment, and I believe it was a good move by Lincoln Riley to take the payday and get out of Norman.
Brent Venables was a good assistant, but I have a feeling he could be Oklahoma's Frank Solich.
Historically, Oklahoma was good due to proximity to Texas in the Big 8. They are slowly undoing the foundation that made them great, and I don't think they have a lot of strategic advantages in the SEC.
Oklahoma is going to go from basically the Top Dog of the past 10 years to at best the 5th best program in their conference. Texas has all the resources and advantages in the world - so they're either going to sink or swim. Considering how many times they've drowned over the past 15 years, I wouldn't bet on them either way.I really think they are going to regret this move, Texas will as well but they don’t have anything to lose.
and the 3 academy schoolsAdd Northwestern and Vandy, Because we all know Big Ten and SEC want them out anyway
I was going to say, OU would be lucky if Venables was as successful as Frank Solich for NebraskaI think there's a better chance that Venables is Oklahoma's Bill Callahan...
Did Cuse and/or GT play Notre Dame last year? That would greatly skew the viewership numbers. Especially if they got some other games stashed on ESPN+, which doesn’t report ratingsGT and Cuse will never be in the B12. I dont get your hard on for them.
I was going to say, OU would be lucky if Venables was as successful as Frank Solich for Nebraska
This. But we have already learned Texas is the best team in the country to do less with more. I am all for the show of OU and UT being mediocre in the SEC. Enjoy that SEC money though.Oklahoma is going to go from basically the Top Dog of the past 10 years to at best the 5th best program in their conference. Texas has all the resources and advantages in the world - so they're either going to sink or swim. Considering how many times they've drowned over the past 15 years, I wouldn't bet on them either way.
A girl I used to work with went to Georgia tech. She said about the dating scene…”the goods are odd, but the odds are good”Yeah, I don't get the love for Georgia Tech. Academically, sure. But they don't move the needle in fan support. I see hundreds of Georgia fans when I'm in Florida for six months. I don't think I've EVER seen a GT fan/tee shirt in 12 years down there. Seen more hok and even ISU than GT. I'd take them before Wake, but about a toss-up with Duke.
The 'Cuse I could accept as a 4th option if 3 of: Miami, VT, NCST, Pitt are added. But probably would prefer Louisville over Syracuse as a 4th from the ACC.
Would be interesting to see the source and background for this data. Sports media watch posts every game that reports, and they never show ACCN or CBSSN or PACN games. So if someone just ignored those in the average then most of their worst games are excluded. Now they are getting an average viewership with their best few games that include Clemson and Notre Dame.If you look at viewership as a reflection of popularity, I would first go after Syracuse and Georgia Tech as the best teams available under your analysis; followed by Miami to pair with Central Florida; then pickem from Pitt and Louisville, whichever West Virginia wants. Duke is a basketball school with nominal football TV following. I would not go over 20 teams, as even that is too big to manage.
The next size up for divisions is 24 with four six team divisions. Then the barn door is open and take Cal, Stanford, Duke and everyone else......Uff Da.
How far are we from:
Isolate the University football programs and become a semi-pro league with Las Vegas operations funding, pay NIL players and buy the best available, and have Vegas establish a 24 hour sports TV network to show all games. (Ha Ha Ha or not?)
They should have learned from the example of Nebraska's crash in the B1G. If you don't win you don't get trophies and you lose your fans. So, love your bags of money and sip Jack Daniels because that is all you will have in ten years.This. But we have already learned Texas is the best team in the country to do less with more. I am all for the show of OU and UT being mediocre in the SEC. Enjoy that SEC money though.
Nebraska currently has the longest bowl drought among Power 5 teams. Texas has a ways to go to drop to that level.They should have learned from the example of Nebraska's crash in the B1G. If you don't win you don't get trophies and you lose your fans. So, love your bags of money and sip Jack Daniels because that is all you will have in ten years.