Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,131
7,731
113
Dubuque
Individual schools don't get a vote in CFP governance.

Each conference gets 1 vote. With Notre Dame, there are 11 seats at the table.
That's the way it is currently. But that doesn't mean Big10, SEC, Big12 and ACC can't go their own route. Or push more CFP money toward the Power conferences. What would happen if conference auto-bids go away and top 12 teams get CFP bids? Would G5 be better to have their own playoff?

Just look at the current playoff payout structure- 80% for 64 schools from P5 conference and 20% for all the G5 schools.
 

werdnamanhill

(⌐■_■)
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 23, 2017
3,396
6,125
113
28
Eastern IA -> Raleigh, NC -> Madison, WI
Clemson, FSU, Miami, UNC, NCSt, Virginia, and Virginia Tech. are meeting with lawyers as we speak.

An interesting web site: Go to College Sports Info to see the 2022 ACC viewership by school.

View attachment 115490
This is why I laugh when people say Duke. I know they bring bball. But they are an atrocious FB draw. And that still drives the bus, even if Yormark wishes it didn't
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,131
7,731
113
Dubuque
It’s not like the ACC used hack lawyers without a clear intent for what they were doing. The GOR was written specifically for this situation - that’s the only reason it exists.

If there was a legal way around the GOR, I expect FSU or another school would already be in court. I can’t imagine they just started looking into this with the latest rounds of realignment, and I can’t think they’d just sit in a legal strategy they thought might work.

We’ve seen a lot of noise and smoke coming from FSU, but that’s likely because they’re stuck and know it.
According to media accounts the ACC GOR are same as the Big12. Some speculation the ACC just borrowed the Big12 document.

The GOR won't be easy to circumvent, but to say that schools have been motivated to break is a stretch IMO. Texas & OU didn't not have enough financial reason to go through a protracted legal battle to break GOR with Big12. The SEC agreement with CBS still runs through 2023/24 season, so the ESPN/SEC gravy train doesn't kick in until July 1, 2024. Miracle of Miracles- OuT's exit from Big12 is effective with 2024 football season.

As we have seen with past realignment, there are a lot of moving pieces that seem to have domino effects. The GOR focuses on a school's relationship with conference, but equally important are the media companies. Which have been willing to make big investments in select brands vs. paying for a 12 team conference.

I doubt the ACC can stay intact through 2036, just a matter if some school finds the legal jackpot to leave in 2024-2026 time frame or buy their way out around 2030/31.
 

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,863
32,207
113
Parts Unknown
According to media accounts the ACC GOR are same as the Big12. Some speculation the ACC just borrowed the Big12 document.

The GOR won't be easy to circumvent, but to say that schools have been motivated to break is a stretch IMO. Texas & OU didn't not have enough financial reason to go through a protracted legal battle to break GOR with Big12. The SEC agreement with CBS still runs through 2023/24 season, so the ESPN/SEC gravy train doesn't kick in until July 1, 2024. Miracle of Miracles- OuT's exit from Big12 is effective with 2024 football season.

As we have seen with past realignment, there are a lot of moving pieces that seem to have domino effects. The GOR focuses on a school's relationship with conference, but equally important are the media companies. Which have been willing to make big investments in select brands vs. paying for a 12 team conference.

I doubt the ACC can stay intact through 2036, just a matter if some school finds the legal jackpot to leave in 2024-2026 time frame or buy their way out around 2030/31.

The 2030 timeline makes it mesh with the Big 12 media timeline. Could be interesting.

I still say if FSU does break the GOR it would be total hell for college football. Complete **** show

Fox and ESPN would see them as a bad partner at least until the greed kicks in a few minutes later.

FSU better have the new agreement locked up before they try BS like that
 

LonelyCyKC

Active Member
Mar 17, 2016
149
85
28
76
If the B1G and SEC were to take the first six, I would still be happy with the next four (Pitt, Miami, Wake Forest, and Louisville) as they are not half bad basketball schools and Miami would make a great fit with Central Florida. And, the others will strengthen our footprint in the east with Cincinnati and West Virginia. Basketball makes money also.
 

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,770
13,410
113
We need to copyright the name BIG XX before someone else like Elon Musk takes it.
I think someone here (a while ago) said the Big 12 has naming rights to the Big 16?, maybe even the Big 14?(moot point now). Correct me if I'm wrong.

That said, naming our conference after a 'number' (16, 18, 20, etc.) is likely not to happen, IMO, as the 'number is a moving target.

I expect them to name the conference in a whole new way, or, keep the Big 12 name with some modifier, whenever they rebrand next year.

Keeping the Big 12 with an additional modifier of some sort, might be the best route. It is well known now as the #3, and the B1G and SEC have not changed their names, essentially.
 

LonelyCyKC

Active Member
Mar 17, 2016
149
85
28
76
As a comparison ( Big 12 football viewership):

TCU is 2,200,000
Oklahoma State is 1,680,000
Baylor is 1,320,000
Kansas State is 1,230,000
Utah is 1,160,000
BYU is 997,000
Iowa State is 881,000
West Virginia is 774,000
Kansas is 732,000
Texas Tech is 680,000
Cincinnati is 653,000
UCF is 510,000
Arizona is 506,000
Colorado is 352,900
Arizona State is 314,000
Houston is 242,000
 

cykadelic2

Well-Known Member
Jun 10, 2006
4,008
1,749
113
Check out this link from post #27,732, interesting info on just how hard it would be to dissolve the conference per the GoR.


Only schools within the conference that are identified as "disinterested directors" would get a vote on dissolving the conference. To be a "disinterested director" means you're not, by definition, an "interested director," which is a school that's been determined by the rest of the league to have a conflict of interest in terms of a vote on dissolving the conference.

So if I understand it correctly, if you're an FSU or Clemson who, it's clear to everyone, has a vested interest in dissolving the ACC, you wouldn't actually get a vote on the matter.
Correct and the bottom line is this, Wake and BC have got the rest of the conference by the balls. In order for the conference to be dissolved or in order to execute a total GOR buyout anytime this decade, they need to be taken care of to their satisfaction in terms of not being relegated in any fashion (i.e. if the ACC breaks up this decade, they end up in the B12).
 

Gonzo

Well-Known Member
Mar 10, 2009
26,733
31,053
113
Behind you
I think someone here (a while ago) said the Big 12 has naming rights to the Big 16?, maybe even the Big 14?(moot point now). Correct me if I'm wrong.

That said, naming our conference after a 'number' (16, 18, 20, etc.) is likely not to happen, IMO, as the 'number is a moving target.

I expect them to name the conference in a whole new way, or, keep the Big 12 name with some modifier, whenever they rebrand next year.

Keeping the Big 12 with an additional modifier of some sort, might be the best route. It is well known now as the #3, and the B1G and SEC have not changed their names, essentially.
I'd hope they don't change the name. Plenty of ways to get creative with a new conference logo, but the name has built up decades of brand equity and should stay.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: aauummm and t-noah

heitclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 21, 2009
16,617
14,403
113
45
Way up there
How does FCS determine their playoffs??
11 automatic bids for conference champs and 13 at large. 8 teams get seeded, then the others bid on home games. It gets to be a mess, it's can be like high school with geography playing a bigger role than resume and home teams literally getting decided by who bids the most.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr.bannedman

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,770
13,410
113
11 automatic bids for conference champs and 13 at large. 8 teams get seeded, then the others bid on home games. It gets to be a mess, it's can be like high school with geography playing a bigger role than resume and home teams literally getting decided by who bids the most.
Sounds a little like politics.
 

exCyDing

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
5,608
10,102
113
According to media accounts the ACC GOR are same as the Big12. Some speculation the ACC just borrowed the Big12 document.

The GOR won't be easy to circumvent, but to say that schools have been motivated to break is a stretch IMO. Texas & OU didn't not have enough financial reason to go through a protracted legal battle to break GOR with Big12. The SEC agreement with CBS still runs through 2023/24 season, so the ESPN/SEC gravy train doesn't kick in until July 1, 2024. Miracle of Miracles- OuT's exit from Big12 is effective with 2024 football season.

As we have seen with past realignment, there are a lot of moving pieces that seem to have domino effects. The GOR focuses on a school's relationship with conference, but equally important are the media companies. Which have been willing to make big investments in select brands vs. paying for a 12 team conference.

I doubt the ACC can stay intact through 2036, just a matter if some school finds the legal jackpot to leave in 2024-2026 time frame or buy their way out around 2030/31.
The problem with the legal option is how long and expensive litigation would be. Something like this could easily take years and, if the ACC loses, it seems likely they would appeal.

A legal Hail Mary might get them out early, or it might just be a money pit soaking up funds that could otherwise be put towards buying their way out in the early 2030s.

Either way, I’d have to think the schools would make damn sure they have a landing spot cleared and the Networks were on board with a full share ready for them when they make the jump. The last thing they’d want is to SDSU themselves or be in a position like OR and WA taking partial shares for a good stretch. A big question is how much the networks have to throw around. They’re acting like they’re tapped out right now, but is that going to last 1-2 years or 5-6? I’d bet the under.
 

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,770
13,410
113
I think there has to be a chance that the ACC survives. Maybe they get Notre Dame to join as a permanent member and try some form of unequal revenue distribution. Stanford joins as well.
Would we (the Big 12) take ND on and unequal share, ND getting more?

Interesting question. One that the ACC might ponder. Problems will inevitably ensue though, if ND got a higher share in any conference.

And as of now, nobody is forcing ND into it either.
 

exCyDing

Well-Known Member
Nov 29, 2017
5,608
10,102
113
Would we (the Big 12) take ND on and unequal share, ND getting more?

Interesting question. One that the ACC might ponder. Problems will inevitably ensue though, if ND got a higher share in any conference.

And as of now, nobody is forcing ND into it either.
Money hasn’t typically been a driver for ND, and they greatly value their independent status. If conferences start going to 10 game slates, it’s going to be difficult for them to fill out their schedule outside of the 5 ACC games. There aren’t many top program that will be lining up to take on essentially 11 P5 games a year. They might get stuck with some rather lackluster opponents and that could hurt for CFP chances, or at least their seeding in the CFP.

That said, 10/10 do not want in the B12. People were worried about OR or WA “being the new Texas” with all sorts of demands for special treatment from the conference. The B10 membership (and probably the SEC) is on the table for them whenever they decide they want it, and that’s the kind of leverage necessary to get a conference to give you whatever you want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: t-noah