Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

alarson

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 15, 2006
59,489
74,200
113
Ankeny
“Until 2026 when the CFP rules change and the B1G/SEC get 95% of the playoff slots”

It’s like these guys are still living in 2011 and think things will never change down the road

Yeah, at very least in that future scenario the number of auto-bids for best conference champions probably goes down to reflect the new number of 'power' conferences. Instead of 6 it might be 4-5.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,643
65,927
113
LA LA Land
“Until 2026 when the CFP rules change and the B1G/SEC get 95% of the playoff slots”

It’s like these guys are still living in 2011 and think things will never change down the road

Big Ten has showed zero reason on field why they deserve more bids than current b12 and acc.

It’s basically buying spots and hoping people ignore the soft middle and weak bottom.

SEC actually merits having a bunch of teams in.
 

KidSilverhair

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2010
11,023
21,666
113
Rapids of the Cedar
www.kegofglory.blogspot.com
If somehow the Pac-9 can convince Oregon and Washington to sign anything right now, what buyout for leaving the league would they actually agree to?

Over or under: $500 gift card to In-N-Out.
It’s gotta be a less than 5% chance Washington and Oregon agree to any kind of GOR with the Apple deal that’s on the table. Why would they? Why would they sign away their chance at $31 million in the B12 or upwards of $35 million in the B1G for a number of years in exchange for … what? Conference loyalty?
 

Clonefan94

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2006
11,186
6,216
113
Schaumburg, IL
But does the Big10 really need to play that game? They don't need Oregon or Washington.
It's not that the Big 10 needs them or doesn't need them, they don't want the Big 12 to have them. The Big 12 getting UO and UW could impact negotiations for the better the next time the Big 12 has to get a new media deal. It's amazing how well the Big 10 has been able to control the narrative of them being good guys.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think the Big 12 will ever come close to getting Big 10 money, but I think the Big 10 looks at it as every penny the Big 12 gets is a penny they could have had for themselves.
 

cyIclSoneU

Well-Known Member
Apr 7, 2016
3,300
4,562
113
If Oregon/Washington to the B1G is the next domino, why would ESPN/FOX want to pay full pro rata for Arizona, ASU, or Utah? They would have no other options; a 75% share for the life of this TV deal would still be their best course and would save FOX/ESPN like $20M a year.

They could theoretically pay a price for waiting if the Big 12 and its media partners decide to press an advantage.
 

KidSilverhair

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2010
11,023
21,666
113
Rapids of the Cedar
www.kegofglory.blogspot.com
If Oregon/Washington to the B1G is the next domino, why would ESPN/FOX want to pay full pro rata for Arizona, ASU, or Utah? They would have no other options; a 75% share for the life of this TV deal would still be their best course and would save FOX/ESPN like $20M a year.

They could theoretically pay a price for waiting if the Big 12 and its media partners decide to press an advantage.
I think Arizona (or whoever is 14th) is already guaranteed the full pro rata.

Numbers 15 and 16, though, yes, you’re right. They’re gonna be over a barrel.
 

Kinch

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2021
5,762
5,859
113
I heard Big 10 is considering taking Oregon and Washington and then trading Iowa, Nebraska and Northwestern to the PAC 12 for Oregon State and Washington State. PAC 12 is hiring Barta to sell Iowa’s apple subscriptions.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 2122 and NWICY

Cyrealist

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2013
2,781
-2,075
63
69
I see that the Big 10 is using the magnifying glass on the ant hill, and then is annoyed when the aunts get flustered and seem desperate to survive.
If I was Washington State, Oregon State, or any other school left behind, I'd be suing ESPN< Fox, and the rest of the networks for collusion, restraint of trade, and anything else I could fit on the paper. And a lot of the rest of us would be cheering them on. As for the B1G, they didn't need to do this. They did it because they're evil.
 

NWICY

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2012
35,455
31,612
113
I heard Big 10 is considering taking Oregon and Washington and then trading Iowa, Nebraska and Northwestern to the PAC 12 for Oregon State and Washington State. PAC 12 is hiring Barta to sell Iowa’s apple subscriptions.
That would be a wild time when conferences could trade teams like the pros trade players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kinch

Stormin

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
45,473
14,346
113
If Oregon/Washington to the B1G is the next domino, why would ESPN/FOX want to pay full pro rata for Arizona, ASU, or Utah? They would have no other options; a 75% share for the life of this TV deal would still be their best course and would save FOX/ESPN like $20M a year.

They could theoretically pay a price for waiting if the Big 12 and its media partners decide to press an advantage.

ESPN has agreed to pro rat for 15 and 16 at $20 million. Fox hasn’t agreed to $11.7 million. Or maybe they have. BY knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isutrevman

simply1

Rec Center HOF
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 10, 2009
45,676
34,423
113
Pdx
If they want to get to 18 teams they kinda do....more games, more content, additional options for late games, USC/UCLA may be pushing for closer neighbors.

Oregon and Washington are the best looking girls left at the dance. What are the other options for the B1G if (and it's a big if) they want to expand? Wait for Notre Dame to make up it's mind, or wait until 2036 for a couple ACC teams.
It’s been widely reported that USC doesn’t want Oregon added.