Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

RealisticCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2014
1,692
2,710
113
Ames, IA
That can change though.
Its the top 6 champions....so the Pac 9 could be left out, especially if it goes below 9 without ORWA.

And that is just for 2 years. After that everything is up in the air how they qualify teams for the playoff, it will be reworked and revoted after the 2 years.
Agreed. In two years, the power conferences will pull rank and drop that to top 4 conference champs and highest rated team from another conference....particularly when one conference is only streaming on Apple.

Then two years after that, it'll change again.
 

FerShizzle

person slash genius
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Feb 5, 2013
16,060
19,983
113
Des Moines
I swear Stewie is on the PACX payroll.

this is just patently false also. the big is going to get multiple playoff bids, while the pac would be a 1 bid league. and we all know the weirdness and difficulty of winning a true round robin league. the big would allow you a couple losses and maybe also let you dodge some tougher teams in the schedule.
 

Allikat

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 20, 2018
476
543
93
PAC-9 is getting 1 spot, every single year, in a 12 team playoff. Maybe.

an 18-team B1G is probably getting 4....3 minimum.
If I am ORWA:

Staying in the PAC and get a 1 in 4ish chance to the playoffs (OR, WA, UU and a random team from the rest of the conference that has a nice year).

Presuming 3.5 spots a year, moving to the BIG my guess is you're in the playoffs 1 in 2.5ish at worst (OSU, Mich, PennST, OR, WA, USC, Random 1, Random 2, Random 3). They are better being third or fourth in the BIG than second in the PAC.

If OR or WA really thinks they are that good moving to the Big 12 would actually be the best odds to make the playoffs. OU would have made it better than 1 in 2. If money is equal and playoff access is the driver over conference affiliation come on over (just don't expect special treatment).
 

LancelotClone

Active Member
Apr 18, 2018
980
23
43
You keep forgetting Crow will become the Stanford president in a few weeks. He’s not thinking about what’s in the best interest of AZ or even ASU - he’s thinking about what’s best for Stanford. Which is why he’s a conflict of interest.
The current Stanford President resigned 2 weeks ago, and his last day is Aug 31st. With the "scandal" that caused him to resign, Stanford isn't going to name a permanent replacement for him in a matter of weeks. They haven't even announced their search committee yet.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: aauummm

RealisticCy

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2014
1,692
2,710
113
Ames, IA
But does the Big10 really need to play that game? They don't need Oregon or Washington.
If they want to get to 18 teams they kinda do....more games, more content, additional options for late games, USC/UCLA may be pushing for closer neighbors.

Oregon and Washington are the best looking girls left at the dance. What are the other options for the B1G if (and it's a big if) they want to expand? Wait for Notre Dame to make up it's mind, or wait until 2036 for a couple ACC teams.
 

NetflixAndClone

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2015
5,626
7,416
113
The State of Hockey
this is just patently false also. the big is going to get multiple playoff bids, while the pac would be a 1 bid league. and we all know the weirdness and difficulty of winning a true round robin league. the big would allow you a couple losses and maybe also let you dodge some tougher teams in the schedule.
I mean just look at pac 12 basketball. Hell two years ago people thought they might only get their champion march madness. I think there is even a chance that the cfp removed one of the 6 aq spots with the pac 12 losing so much.
 

Cyched

CF Influencer
May 8, 2009
38,357
66,321
113
Colorado
old-school-keep-our-composure.gif