We already have 13. We can’t stay at 13 for football.Stay at 12 for football.
14 for basketball with UCONN & Gonzaga.
Can we do that?
We already have 13. We can’t stay at 13 for football.Stay at 12 for football.
14 for basketball with UCONN & Gonzaga.
Can we do that?
I do not really understand a desire to keep them together. They can still play each other out of conference in all sports. Being in two different conferences seems similar to diversifying for security purposes.
This has been said so many times just in the last few days. We can't have 13 members. the 9-game schedule for football doesn't work.
Honestly, perhaps.Maybe Fox has figured out it is cheaper to pay each PAC school $5-8 million for some small linear piece than add all the schools to Big 10 &12?
No. Rework the schedule. Taking ****** Uconn because 'the schedule doesn't work' is as dumb as it gets.yes we do need another team. lol
Yeah, that Ohio State loss to Va Tech that year was far worse than TCU’s loss to Baylor, but it didn’t matter to the big-brained chuckleheads who selected the playoff field, cause “Ohio State!”The year TCU got screwed they had a better sos heading into playoff/bowls than Ohio St but the big 10 committee and media still used schedule strength lies against them.
A big 12 auto bid nullifies that worst case scenario where reality gets thrown out the window so b10 committee gets its fav team in every season.
Someone posted a few days ago that their BOR is made up mostly of Arizona State alums. Figures.If I were a member of the AZ BOR I’d see this as an opportunity to diversify risk. Seems silly to not take that opportunity to diversify into a more stable investment without having to sell at the current low price. Free opportunities like this don’t come around very often.
No, Man! The Big12 cannot stay at 13. This has been discussed ad nauseam.Why? If Pac9 signs a deal Big12 can stay at 13 ad just wait things out
The Big 12 is going to get laughed at because they failed to bring in Zona.
Absolutely is embarrassing for the Big12. For a second we were on the verge of having gained some respect. Striking out on AZ is not a good look.No nutcup needed. Strong third. No one’s leaving. PAC will not last with everyone looking elsewhere.
The big 12 has already said they're going to 14, so I don't know why you're going to die on this hill lolNo. Rework the schedule. Taking ****** Uconn because 'the schedule doesn't work' is as dumb as it gets.
Also, per my understanding, is UCLA was bleeding debt. The state would've been downright stupid to finance that debt themselves instead of the media doing it for them. Not to mention the additional revenue generated from better national exposure.Take UCLA as an example, they had to circle back and get the California system governing body's permission prior to it becoming official which resulted in the negotiation that got Cal the ongoing payment from UCLA. You're right many times it is all but done prior to the board formality, but that vote happens at one point or another. In this case Arizona was very open and upfront with the Arizona Board of Regents unlike UCLA, Oklahoma, etc.
Holy ****
We already have 13. We can’t stay at 13 for football.
Holy ****
Holy ****
Holy ****
It’s in the ******* media contracts that the Big12 must have 9 conference games. You’re suggesting Yormark goes to ESPN and Fox and says…”meh…how about we just have 8”?No. Rework the schedule. Taking ****** Uconn because 'the schedule doesn't work' is as dumb as it gets.
It just seems like UA is too far along the process to back out.
ASU and UU were always tougher sells so I’m not overly surprised if they decide to stay