Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

jctisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2017
8,726
10,674
113
If you end up with a situation like UCLA having to make payments to Cal, Arizona leaving the Pac makes absolutely no sense for them.
Yes if that is the case, there's no way Arizona takes that. I just meant from a standpoint of every other time people have said team x can't be separated from team y in the state. That's been proven false every time.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1UNI2ISU

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,442
65,669
113
LA LA Land
It pictorially shows the case to take UCONN over Utah. That’s really the only reason necessary, to make the pods work out geographically

Utah only has a max of about 1.7 million people to draw a fan base from, the rest of the small population state hates them. Would not the #1 basketball program in the #1 conference have more eyes than that?
 

BWRhasnoAC

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 10, 2013
30,013
27,719
113
Dez Moy Nez
Yes if that is the case, there's no way Arizona takes that. I just meant from a standpoint of every other time people have said team x can't be separated from team y in the state. That's been proven false every time.
Crow holds lots of power politically in the state and on the BOR. He's absolutely the reason this is going to ****.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: jctisu

DarkStar

Well-Known Member
Sep 15, 2009
10,085
12,467
113
Ames
It's probably been answered before, but did ND sign in on that GOR? Or can they bolt any time they want?
If I remember correctly, their agreement with the ACC says they have to join the ACC if they join a conference. No clue what the penalty is if they don't.
 

DSM4Cy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Apr 4, 2006
2,586
3,205
113
Altoona, IA
I’m totally fine with UConn. National brand, elite basketball, have spent a long time in a “power conference” previously, plus they would only get a reduced share as they aren’t P5 right now. Let’s not pretend Arizona football is some amazing property - yes, they are better than UConn but in most years they have been toward the bottom of the Pac.

I’d still prefer Arizona, but UConn is fine. And I wouldn’t be sad at all if Arizona State and Utah aren’t coming. That gives more spots in the future for ACC defections or even Pac schools down the road.
 

JM4CY

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 23, 2012
37,855
74,515
113
America
Only other option would be to have CU only play 8 conference games in 2024 and add SDSU in 2025.
gtfo-gtfoh.gif
 

Nolaeer

Well-Known Member
Nov 24, 2012
787
962
93
It pictorially shows the case to take UCONN over Utah. That’s really the only reason necessary, to make the pods work out geographically
I've said all along id rather Uconn than Utah.
as long as we get arz and arz state, let utah fight boise state for the mountain west championship year in year out.
 

jctisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2017
8,726
10,674
113
Crow holds lots of power politically in the state and on the BOR. He's absolutely the reason this is going to ****.
It's a strange situation because he is all academic-focused, which in the grand scheme dwarfs what they get in a media rights deal for athletics. But his arrogance and hitching his wagon to Larry Scott shows his poor judgment.
 

Trice

Well-Known Member
Apr 1, 2010
7,314
12,173
113
If I were Robbins, I’d say fine but the BOR must make up the difference from public money.

I think you have the power dynamic backward here. Not to mention if their government functions like Iowa, the Board doesn't allocate funds, they request it from the legislature.
 

CoachHines3

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 29, 2019
9,568
19,526
113
I’m totally fine with UConn. National brand, elite basketball, have spent a long time in a “power conference” previously, plus they would only get a reduced share as they aren’t P5 right now. Let’s not pretend Arizona football is some amazing property - yes, they are better than UConn but in most years they have been toward the bottom of the Pac.

I’d still prefer Arizona, but UConn is fine. And I wouldn’t be sad at all if Arizona State and Utah aren’t coming. That gives more spots in the future for ACC defections or even Pac schools down the road.
I'd rather just have that Phoenix area market, not that markets totally matter. We also pull recruits from AZ so it would be nice to have some territory down there.
 

jctisu

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2017
8,726
10,674
113
Oregon and Washington leave and the Apple Deal is void. How long for the GOR? One year?
Even if they stay and Arizona is the only one to leave, how does that not have at least some effect on the Apple numbers? Arizona is in a state with a big populous and is growing still. And it's a school that from a subscription standpoint actually cares about one of the big sports (basketball).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stormin

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,702
24,762
113
I think you have the power dynamic backward here. Not to mention if their government functions like Iowa, the Board doesn't allocate funds, they request it from the legislature.

So what power does the BOR have then? What happens if Robbins signs a deal with the Big12?