If I’m Yormark, I’d let AZ in as full member right away then let ASU and Utah grovel and slink in at a lower rate. They clearly were not business savvy enough to keep all options open earlier in the process.
I do believe they are slated to be a permanent semi-final host (or at least in the Playoff rotation) in the expanded CFP. So, the conference ties will beasically be irrelevant going forward. Heck, they are a semi-final this year, so the old B1G-Pac Rose Bowl (which strated with the 1947 Rose Bowl) is already dead. If I am wrong about this, I'm sure somebody will chime in with the correction.So if the B1G takes 2-4 Pac schools, and the B12 takes 2-4 Pac schools, what happens to the Rose Bowl.
Does it move affiliation to the B12 and B1G?
Does it become an at large NY6 bowl like the Fiesta etc?
Gotta believe it wont end with the end of the PAC.
Which a separate basketball contract can severely screw up expectations.I’d still take a half share of Big 10 knowing I’d be full share in their next media deal and a secure future.
Next year we add four,I know you don't need 64 or 4x16, I've always just been interested in how that # has changed over the years.
There was one point a few years back that it was exactly 64 if you didn't count independent ND.
For a while it was only growing...UConn and USF were the first subtraction #s who lost "BCS" conference status. Now Wash St and Ore St almost certain subtraction. Cal/Stanford with a slim chance of being a subtraction too.
The Big12 contract will remain the same at 3/3 as it is now at 3/5. The gap will still be the same.
Wash. State has no chance. Pullman, WA is really isolated. Been there and done that too! No games there, but I have visited the Campus. FWIW, I think Oregon State would make a great add like Iowa State would (to any other conference). They both just have a perception problem.Who just made you Bob Barker?
And I seriously have empathy for WSU and OR State. What they must be going through. Well, we've been there.
But we came out on the other side. I'm not sure if that will happen with them.
You're so misguided that the Big10 media powers got to you.You honestly think the Big 10 gives two ***** about the football value of the Big 12? Big 12 adding ORWA isn't going to increase the value to the extent where we're suddenly competing with them on that. The sole reason why the Big 10 didn't add ORWA a year ago is the PR - they don't want to look like the "bad guys" in all of this. By adding them now when the Pac 12 is about to implode they get them and get to proclaim that "they're saving them" all while villainizing the Big 12 in the process.
Or would they drop to the AAC and ESPN says we will give you 10MM if you go there. Much cheaper than what they were but adds a couple stronger teams to the AAC.Ive seen people wonder, if Fox will only pay for 1 more school, would we take 3.
My feeling is this. If WAOR leave to the B1G, and AZ jumps to the B12.
What are the rest going to do. The deal they had for whatever they had, is going to be off the table.
So they are going to be lucky to get a deal that pays them similar to the MWC. At which point if Fox wont pay its share, and the B12 doesnt pick up another partner for the content. Those teams will be happy to accept just ESPNs 20m share. So I could see it going that BY tells them that if the PAC falls apart we can only guarantee full share for 14 teams, after that you might get more, you might get less, depending on Fox or another added partner. Be the 14th or take that risk.
But I still have an idea in the end if we go to 16 everyone will get the pro rata, but it gives them an incentive to be the 14th.
If I’m Yormark, I’d let AZ in as full member right away then let ASU and Utah grovel and slink in at a lower rate. They clearly were not business savvy enough to keep all options open earlier in the process.
Next year we add four,
Why can you link that here?Dennis Dodd has a very interesting article on CBS Sports. Sorry I can’t put that on here. But, the addition talk about adding another team to the big 12 is nice. We Ned to add bigger fish. That means cracking the ACC contract to go after Miami, Clemson, FSU, those people. Oregon? I think that is the only way the Big 12 competes and grows the money that is coming in 10-15 years. The sooner the ACC contract goes away the sooner the really big money gets pushed in the pool.
It's OK to have 2 schools from one state. And based everything that I have read WSU and OSU have valuations more appropriate of MWC schools. Which is where they will end up if the Pac12 implodes.Considering we would already have representation in Arizona and Utah, a stronger case could be made for adding Washington state and Oregon state over asu and Utah. Or just only add one (arizona).
hes drivingWhy can you link that here?
If the PAC brand goes totally away and osu/wazzup end up in the mwc, that might be the best outcome we've seen for a g5 conference in the history of realignment. They were looking at getting gutted to backfill and having to promote other schools, now they could end not only securing their biggest brands but also add two decent programs right basically in their footprint.
What’s the TLDR on scheers latest 247 article about the pac 12 number officially being 24 Mil on the high end and that all 4 corner schools are now aligned
My only sticking point with this is that if everyone else (B1G, SEC) starts going to super conferences, we best be doing the same as well. Constant contacts and constant list of 20 team candidates, ready to go at any point.So many have commented and I completely agree on just convince Zona, then let some of the dominos fall.
SIgn me up right now. Let's jump to the part where this is the result.Iowa
Iowa St
Nebraska
Minn
Illinois
Wisc
Missouri
Kansas
Kansas St
Oklah St
at some point this will probably be our "subdivision" of whatever conference we're called....
"Midwest Region - West"