Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

longdriveforsom

Active Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 2, 2008
115
201
43
San Diego,CA
And do not underestimate the pork chop sandwiches you can get at a Louisville football game! FWIW, their football stadium is the only FBS on campus stadium that is 100% seatbacks. It's a very nice stadium. The Upper deck is steep, but you can see Churchill Downs from there which is also a good daily double when you can go to a football game and racing at Churchill Downs on the same day!
You're not kidding about the upper deck. I went to the 2021 Louisville - UK game and watched someone fall 6-7 rows.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,680
66,023
113
LA LA Land
The bad thing about this is if the PAC ceases to exist, and then the ACC blows up, the Big 12 will be a distant third behind the B1G and the SEC a lot sooner than we thought.

Being 3 of 5 was fine. Being 3 of 4 is OK. Being 3 of 3 will kinda suck. But I guess we can live with it as ISU fans to be in one of the three 20-24 team conferences. Better than the fate that is awaiting WSU, OSU, Wake Forest, etc.

I don't know, will it really?

The Big ten was already making a lot more than Big 12. Their basketball totally sucks compared to the Big 12 (as does everybody else except for Big East). Ohio State has been the best program in either conference in football but Baylor, OK St and TCU have all done just as much as Michigan and Penn State, actually more. Then after those top teams the Big 12 is kind of objectively deeper in the middle and bottom.

No amount of money is going to make Minnesota, Rutgers, Purdue, Illinois, Maryland, NW and Indiana into Texas-based or Florida-based football teams.

SEC is a different animal, they have a path to utterly crush all other leagues in football including Big Ten.
 

Cloneon

Well-Known Member
Oct 29, 2015
3,004
3,120
113
West Virginia
Again, I think it’s what ESPN and Fox want at this point. Only so many games can be on in a given day. They’re not going to pay $60 million for a team to not be on TV (or to be on ESPN News). It may be that they push schools like Oregon and Washington to the Big 12. We’ll pay you 40 but not 60 type of deal.
Hey lawyers. If the B1G pays more for the product than the P12 offer, could there be an argument for some sort of antitrust? Inferring of course, that they're manipulating the nationwide product.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hoosman

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,680
66,023
113
LA LA Land
You don’t need to have 64. You can have 68 and make 4 teams play their games in Dayton

I know you don't need 64 or 4x16, I've always just been interested in how that # has changed over the years.

There was one point a few years back that it was exactly 64 if you didn't count independent ND.

For a while it was only growing...UConn and USF were the first subtraction #s who lost "BCS" conference status. Now Wash St and Ore St almost certain subtraction. Cal/Stanford with a slim chance of being a subtraction too.
 

jdolson27

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2015
246
340
63
42
I don't know, will it really?

The Big ten was already making a lot more than Big 12. Their basketball totally sucks compared to the Big 12 (as does everybody else except for Big East). Ohio State has been the best program in either conference in football but Baylor, OK St and TCU have all done just as much as Michigan and Penn State, actually more. Then after those top teams the Big 12 is kind of objectively deeper in the middle and bottom.

No amount of money is going to make Minnesota, Rutgers, Purdue, Illinois, Maryland, NW and Indiana into Texas-based or Florida-based football teams.

SEC is a different animal, they have a path to utterly crush all other leagues in football including Big Ten.
That’s another reason big ten is not going allow Oregon and Washington go to big 12. It’s going to add to the football value of the big 12.
 

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,771
13,412
113
SEC is a different animal, they have a path to utterly crush all other leagues in football including Big Ten.
And if there is an SEC (or (B1G) team playing I most likely will be finding other things to do with my time. Do not care what the final score is.

If this is what the media partners want, they need to realize they are alienating half (or more) of the population that used to enjoy college FB.
 

jdolson27

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2015
246
340
63
42
And if there is an SEC (or (B1G) team playing I most likely will be finding other things to do with my time. Do not care what the final score is.

If this is what the media partners want, they need to realize they are allienating half (or more) of the population that used to enjoy college FB.
That’s exactly right. That’s why none of my TVs go to those games.
 

AlaCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
5,584
6,783
113
it won’t happen but it would be great to take Arizona, Arizona state, and UConn. Leaving Utah out and back filling them into the big 12 years later.
Change UConn to Oregon State, and I like that even better! The Beavers have recently won CWS Baseball Championships, been to the Elite 8 in Men's B-Ball and won a Fiesta Bowl this century. Plus, they are closer to Portland than Oregon is. Point about that is that travel to and from Ore. State is not that bad. I did it myself in 2019 when I went to the Cyclones @ Beavers MBB game. Attended the Beavers football game vs. Washington the night before too. So, Arizona (Must), Ariz. State and Ore. State (for the fun of it) come on down!
 

CyrenAlert

Member
Jul 20, 2023
56
12
8
I don't know, will it really?

The Big ten was already making a lot more than Big 12. Their basketball totally sucks compared to the Big 12 (as does everybody else except for Big East). Ohio State has been the best program in either conference in football but Baylor, OK St and TCU have all done just as much as Michigan and Penn State, actually more. Then after those top teams the Big 12 is kind of objectively deeper in the middle and bottom.

What in the world would cause someone to type such nonsense?
 

1UNI2ISU

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2013
9,037
12,149
113
Waterloo
They can't just "forego their payments". The ACC would still hold their rights. The big 10 can't broadcast what it doesn't have rights to. So they'd bring zero value to the big 10.
Had a thought. Might be off.

That's how you get them to the Big Ten. ESPN continues to own the rights to their home games, it gives ESPN a back door into Big Ten content and the other portions of the Big Ten deal still pay FSU/Clemson enough where it's worth their while to move. The remaining ACC is still worth the money ESPN is paying them even without those two.

The Big Ten's other media partners still have 9 FSU/Clemson games and ESPN gets 9 Big Ten games at a massive discount. Same thing applies to basketball.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,680
66,023
113
LA LA Land
That’s another reason big ten is not going allow Oregon and Washington go to big 12. It’s going to add to the football value of the big 12.

On the field results will still exist.

Look at basketball. The media slobbers over the Big Ten all year, every year, 24/7 and they get great seeds and lots of bids every year. Then reality happens, they get destroyed immediately in the big dance, the Big 12 and Big East almost always do great and some years the ACC does great.

SEC football is the scary one, they are legit dominant and the idea of them getting bigger and better than they already are isn't necessarily good for the sport if you want it to remain a national thing.

You could argue the Big Ten lower tier teams can now try new coaches faster until they get a winner, but being impatient with fb coaches especially can backfire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jdolson27

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,909
8,398
113
Overland Park
The bad thing about this is if the PAC ceases to exist, and then the ACC blows up, the Big 12 will be a distant third behind the B1G and the SEC a lot sooner than we thought.

Being 3 of 5 was fine. Being 3 of 4 is OK. Being 3 of 3 will kinda suck. But I guess we can live with it as ISU fans to be in one of the three 20-24 team conferences. Better than the fate that is awaiting WSU, OSU, Wake Forest, etc.
The Big12 contract will remain the same at 3/3 as it is now at 3/5. The gap will still be the same.
 

jdoggivjc

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2006
61,625
23,880
113
Macomb, MI
That’s another reason big ten is not going allow Oregon and Washington go to big 12. It’s going to add to the football value of the big 12.

You honestly think the Big 10 gives two ***** about the football value of the Big 12? Big 12 adding ORWA isn't going to increase the value to the extent where we're suddenly competing with them on that. The sole reason why the Big 10 didn't add ORWA a year ago is the PR - they don't want to look like the "bad guys" in all of this. By adding them now when the Pac 12 is about to implode they get them and get to proclaim that "they're saving them" all while villainizing the Big 12 in the process.
 

jdolson27

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2015
246
340
63
42
On the field results will still exist.

Look at basketball. The media slobbers over the Big Ten all year, every year, 24/7 and they get great seeds and lots of bids every year. Then reality happens, they get destroyed immediately in the big dance, the Big 12 and Big East almost always do great and some years the ACC does great.

SEC football is the scary one, they are legit dominant and the idea of them getting bigger and better than they already are isn't necessarily good for the sport if you want it to remain a national thing.

You could argue the Big Ten lower tier teams can now try new coaches faster until they get a winner, but being impatient with fb coaches especially can backfire.
Very true on all those points.
 

cysmiley

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 30, 2012
2,516
2,366
113
They can't just "forego their payments". The ACC would still hold their rights. The big 10 can't broadcast what it doesn't have rights to. So they'd bring zero value to the big 10.
Yeah, can't wait for fox and espn crews show up at the stadium with baseball bats! Set up the cameras guys! LOL
 

t-noah

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2007
19,771
13,412
113
Change UConn to Oregon State, and I like that even better! The Beavers have recently won CWS Baseball Championships, been to the Elite 8 in Men's B-Ball and won a Fiesta Bowl this century. Plus, they are closer to Portland than Oregon is. Point about that is that travel to and from Ore. State is not that bad. I did it myself in 2019 when I went to the Cyclones @ Beavers MBB game. Attended the Beavers football game vs. Washington the night before too. So, Arizona (Must), Ariz. State and Ore. State (for the fun of it) come on down!
Who just made you Bob Barker?

:D
And I seriously have empathy for WSU and OR State. What they must be going through. Well, we've been there.

But we came out on the other side. I'm not sure if that will happen with them.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: drmwevr08

jdolson27

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2015
246
340
63
42
You honestly think the Big 10 gives two ***** about the football value of the Big 12? Big 12 adding ORWA isn't going to increase the value to the extent where we're suddenly competing with them on that. The sole reason why the Big 10 didn't add ORWA a year ago is the PR - they don't want to look like the "bad guys" in all of this. By adding them now when the Pac 12 is about to implode they get them and get to proclaim that "they're saving them" all while villainizing the Big 12 in the process.
With the college football playoffs expanding it definitely will help them get a spot or two. Oregon and Washington usually in top 15 for football consistently. Didn’t say compete with them either. Just stating that they aren’t going let two teams that have potential of grabbing playoff spots when expanding go to the big 12.