Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

ForbinsAscynt

Well-Known Member
Dec 8, 2014
5,050
6,302
113
If I’m Yormark, I’d let AZ in as full member right away then let ASU and Utah grovel and slink in at a lower rate. They clearly were not business savvy enough to keep all options open earlier in the process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lyndal and HFCS

AlaCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
5,584
6,783
113
So if the B1G takes 2-4 Pac schools, and the B12 takes 2-4 Pac schools, what happens to the Rose Bowl.
Does it move affiliation to the B12 and B1G?
Does it become an at large NY6 bowl like the Fiesta etc?

Gotta believe it wont end with the end of the PAC.
I do believe they are slated to be a permanent semi-final host (or at least in the Playoff rotation) in the expanded CFP. So, the conference ties will beasically be irrelevant going forward. Heck, they are a semi-final this year, so the old B1G-Pac Rose Bowl (which strated with the 1947 Rose Bowl) is already dead. If I am wrong about this, I'm sure somebody will chime in with the correction. :)
 

cysmiley

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jun 30, 2012
2,516
2,366
113
I know you don't need 64 or 4x16, I've always just been interested in how that # has changed over the years.

There was one point a few years back that it was exactly 64 if you didn't count independent ND.

For a while it was only growing...UConn and USF were the first subtraction #s who lost "BCS" conference status. Now Wash St and Ore St almost certain subtraction. Cal/Stanford with a slim chance of being a subtraction too.
Next year we add four,
 

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,634
7,487
113
Ive seen people wonder, if Fox will only pay for 1 more school, would we take 3.

My feeling is this. If WAOR leave to the B1G, and AZ jumps to the B12.

What are the rest going to do. The deal they had for whatever they had, is going to be off the table.
So they are going to be lucky to get a deal that pays them similar to the MWC. At which point if Fox wont pay its share, and the B12 doesnt pick up another partner for the content. Those teams will be happy to accept just ESPNs 20m share. So I could see it going that BY tells them that if the PAC falls apart we can only guarantee full share for 14 teams, after that you might get more, you might get less, depending on Fox or another added partner. Be the 14th or take that risk.

But I still have an idea in the end if we go to 16 everyone will get the pro rata, but it gives them an incentive to be the 14th.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 1UNI2ISU

RonBurgundy

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 5, 2017
3,595
5,171
113
43
The Big12 contract will remain the same at 3/3 as it is now at 3/5. The gap will still be the same.

True, but there will be a lot more teams "out-gapping" us.

Believe me, I am fine if the Big 12 is last in payout as long as it is competitive enough to hire good coaches and invest in facilities. I am just surprised it may get here faster than we all thought.

As long as P2 is not the end result of all this.
 

AlaCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
5,584
6,783
113
Who just made you Bob Barker?

:D
And I seriously have empathy for WSU and OR State. What they must be going through. Well, we've been there.

But we came out on the other side. I'm not sure if that will happen with them.
Wash. State has no chance. Pullman, WA is really isolated. Been there and done that too! No games there, but I have visited the Campus. FWIW, I think Oregon State would make a great add like Iowa State would (to any other conference). They both just have a perception problem.
 

ISUCyclones2015

Doesn't wipe standing up
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Dec 19, 2010
14,611
10,905
113
Chicago, IL
You honestly think the Big 10 gives two ***** about the football value of the Big 12? Big 12 adding ORWA isn't going to increase the value to the extent where we're suddenly competing with them on that. The sole reason why the Big 10 didn't add ORWA a year ago is the PR - they don't want to look like the "bad guys" in all of this. By adding them now when the Pac 12 is about to implode they get them and get to proclaim that "they're saving them" all while villainizing the Big 12 in the process.
You're so misguided that the Big10 media powers got to you.

They did all this because they knew the Pac12 would eventually die and they could get Washington and Oregon at half price. They don't give two ***** about killing a conference
 

BCClone

Well Seen Member.
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Sep 4, 2011
67,645
63,707
113
Not exactly sure.
Ive seen people wonder, if Fox will only pay for 1 more school, would we take 3.

My feeling is this. If WAOR leave to the B1G, and AZ jumps to the B12.

What are the rest going to do. The deal they had for whatever they had, is going to be off the table.
So they are going to be lucky to get a deal that pays them similar to the MWC. At which point if Fox wont pay its share, and the B12 doesnt pick up another partner for the content. Those teams will be happy to accept just ESPNs 20m share. So I could see it going that BY tells them that if the PAC falls apart we can only guarantee full share for 14 teams, after that you might get more, you might get less, depending on Fox or another added partner. Be the 14th or take that risk.

But I still have an idea in the end if we go to 16 everyone will get the pro rata, but it gives them an incentive to be the 14th.
Or would they drop to the AAC and ESPN says we will give you 10MM if you go there. Much cheaper than what they were but adds a couple stronger teams to the AAC.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,793
24,891
113
If I’m Yormark, I’d let AZ in as full member right away then let ASU and Utah grovel and slink in at a lower rate. They clearly were not business savvy enough to keep all options open earlier in the process.

Agreed. Give Arizona ESPN and Fox money. Give ASU and Utah ESPN money only.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2speedy1

FLYINGCYCLONE

Well-Known Member
Aug 27, 2022
1,181
934
113
68
LuVerne Iowa
Dennis Dodd has a very interesting article on CBS Sports. Sorry I can’t put that on here. But, the addition talk about adding another team to the big 12 is nice. We Ned to add bigger fish. That means cracking the ACC contract to go after Miami, Clemson, FSU, those people. Oregon? I think that is the only way the Big 12 competes and grows the money that is coming in 10-15 years. The sooner the ACC contract goes away the sooner the really big money gets pushed in the pool.
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,657
65,949
113
LA LA Land
Next year we add four,

My #s were all the confirmed moves, not where people are playing now. So our 13 is the new four and Colorado...even though almost certain AZ moves from Pac for now they are Pac 9.

I see the total # of "power conference" teams subtracting by 2 or 4. I really can't see any team outside of slim chance UConn adding to the #.

The scary thing is that Iowa State has been that "subtraction" candidate several times and we finally ARE NOT.

USF - Already happened
UConn - Already happened
WSU - happening
Ore St - happening
Cal/Stanford - some chance of losing at musical chairs
Boston College, Syracuse, Wake Forest - be on alert next wave
...those are the victims of realignment in terms of being power conference and losing it.

New Mexico State and Idaho are the mid major or "G5" type teams that lost FBS conference membership in all this. I'm sure MWC members will try to lock together to avoid another round of that.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: aauummm

2speedy1

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2014
6,634
7,487
113
Dennis Dodd has a very interesting article on CBS Sports. Sorry I can’t put that on here. But, the addition talk about adding another team to the big 12 is nice. We Ned to add bigger fish. That means cracking the ACC contract to go after Miami, Clemson, FSU, those people. Oregon? I think that is the only way the Big 12 competes and grows the money that is coming in 10-15 years. The sooner the ACC contract goes away the sooner the really big money gets pushed in the pool.
Why can you link that here?
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,131
7,732
113
Dubuque
Considering we would already have representation in Arizona and Utah, a stronger case could be made for adding Washington state and Oregon state over asu and Utah. Or just only add one (arizona).
It's OK to have 2 schools from one state. And based everything that I have read WSU and OSU have valuations more appropriate of MWC schools. Which is where they will end up if the Pac12 implodes.

ASU is in MSA of nearly 5M people. The Big12 would love to be in a media market that big. People are critical of UU fans, but there is no denying the Utes have had a top 15 football program over the last 10-15 years. Brands matter, but in the case of the Big12, we need programs that are good enough to play in the CFP.

In this case, the Big12 having a strong regional presence in the Southwest outweighs the need to be spread out and have teams in Oregon & Washington.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RonBurgundy

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,657
65,949
113
LA LA Land
If the PAC brand goes totally away and osu/wazzup end up in the mwc, that might be the best outcome we've seen for a g5 conference in the history of realignment. They were looking at getting gutted to backfill and having to promote other schools, now they could end not only securing their biggest brands but also add two decent programs right basically in their footprint.

WSU/Ore St fit the footprint well, they are new states but very close to MWC teams, especially by the history of these western conference including old Wac, Pac and MWC. If MWC wants to further expand either Montana school is the same situation where it's a new state but fits the footprint well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heitclone

CoachHines3

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Oct 29, 2019
9,573
19,530
113
What’s the TLDR on scheers latest 247 article about the pac 12 number officially being 24 Mil on the high end and that all 4 corner schools are now aligned
 

HFCS

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2010
75,657
65,949
113
LA LA Land
What’s the TLDR on scheers latest 247 article about the pac 12 number officially being 24 Mil on the high end and that all 4 corner schools are now aligned

I haven't read it but that would be the first reasonable source I've heard report that Utah is now begging to join the Truck Stop. It was inevitable at some point. The first time they play in Ames we need truck stop jokes en masse. (just hope it goes better than the other Utah game in Ames)

I don't think ASU was ever as nuts as Utah and they've completely joined the B12 bandwagon.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: aauummm

MeowingCows

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2015
39,995
40,766
113
Iowa
So many have commented and I completely agree on just convince Zona, then let some of the dominos fall.
My only sticking point with this is that if everyone else (B1G, SEC) starts going to super conferences, we best be doing the same as well. Constant contacts and constant list of 20 team candidates, ready to go at any point.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JP4CY

Die4Cy

Well-Known Member
Jan 2, 2010
14,972
15,857
113
Iowa
Iowa St
Nebraska
Minn
Illinois
Wisc
Missouri
Kansas
Kansas St
Oklah St

at some point this will probably be our "subdivision" of whatever conference we're called....

"Midwest Region - West"
SIgn me up right now. Let's jump to the part where this is the result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dopey