We're ISU.... so most likely Okie St will go to the SEC, and the PAC and ACC will merge.... and once again we'll be screwed.
Wake Forest vs. Washington State. Exciting. PAC ACC Game of the Week. Next week Boston College vs. Oregon State. Can’t wait
We're ISU.... so most likely Okie St will go to the SEC, and the PAC and ACC will merge.... and once again we'll be screwed.
That's like most games in other conferences for me now - I don't watch.Wake Forest vs. Washington State. Exciting. PAC ACC Game of the Week. Next week Boston College vs. Oregon State. Can’t wait
Think of the dozens of eyeballs of Syracuse vs Cal.Wake Forest vs. Washington State. Exciting. PAC ACC Game of the Week. Next week Boston College vs. Oregon State. Can’t wait
So we’d really just be adding one extra in Cal in the long run, in order to eliminate the Pac12 and get the 4-6 we want?Because Stanford is waiting for the Big 10 and Cal is the the 4th most popular PAC team in the state and sucks ass at both sports
Can we please stop implying that the AAC (at least before we took Cincy, Houston and UCF) was basically going to the MAC? There’s a pretty big difference between ending up in the best G5 conference vs one that would likely lose a challenge with the Missouri Valley.You know that's not the worst idea I've seen. Would suck to not be with the other b12, but compared to what could have been last year (MAC) this isn't the worst
This is all a perfect summary.I did not write this but share the opinion:
The question: During a July 6, 2022, appearance on Wichita's Sports Daily on KFH, GoPowercat publisher Tim Fitzgerald was asked by hosts Bruce Haertl and Jacob Albracht about the ongoing push by ESPN and Fox to elevate the SEC and Big Ten into national college football products. Here is how Fitz spontaneously answered on the radio …
“There's a great miscalculation taking place in New York City and Connecticut, wherever the headquarters might be for these entities, in thinking that somehow college football is a national product. It never has been guys. It's a regional product. It's a local product, and the reason why we love it is we're all intertwined.
“If you're an NFL fan, you're gonna watch the NFL because it's all one big entity. It's all one organism. College football is not that way. It never has been that way. We watch Alabama play Georgia, because the schools with which were affiliated, in this case, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and Baylor in the last couple of years, have had an opportunity to play on the same field with those teams.
“If you remove that, if you remove any connection the Big 12 champion might have at competing at the highest level, we don't care. We're not going to watch football from the Upper Midwest or the Southeast. This is not how college football has ever been.
“And their misunderstanding of the very essential product that they're trying to buy, and then sell back to the public is stunning to me in its stupidity. This is not going to work. It might work for a while.
“But you guys are in the TV business and may be a little more familiar with these numbers because I think you probably get paid in the billions. That's my understanding. How in the hell — and I know the SEC is popular — but they're talking about $100 million-plus in revenue for each school and they're talking about getting to 20 schools if they can add some ACC programs. How is SEC football worth $2 billion a year to ESPN?
“I don't find the math adding up for myself. I just don't see it. I think it's really, they've screwed this up in their heads.”
This sums me up exactly. The only reason I watch non-ISU matchups is to see how it applies to potential future bowl match-ups and keeping tabs on the overall college football season since ISU is in the same overall league. You take ISU out of the big league College Football arrangement, I have 0% interest in the Big Ten and SEC. Yes I am just one person and that makes zero difference but I venture to guess a majority of college football fans are the same way. Nobody just casually watches college football, they watch because they are fans of a team. You cut off enough teams from the P2, you lose a significant viewership from non-P2 who won't pay for subscriptions, won't tune into national broadcasts on linear networks, and then those huge estimates don't pan out.I did not write this but share the opinion:
The question: During a July 6, 2022, appearance on Wichita's Sports Daily on KFH, GoPowercat publisher Tim Fitzgerald was asked by hosts Bruce Haertl and Jacob Albracht about the ongoing push by ESPN and Fox to elevate the SEC and Big Ten into national college football products. Here is how Fitz spontaneously answered on the radio …
“There's a great miscalculation taking place in New York City and Connecticut, wherever the headquarters might be for these entities, in thinking that somehow college football is a national product. It never has been guys. It's a regional product. It's a local product, and the reason why we love it is we're all intertwined.
“If you're an NFL fan, you're gonna watch the NFL because it's all one big entity. It's all one organism. College football is not that way. It never has been that way. We watch Alabama play Georgia, because the schools with which were affiliated, in this case, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and Baylor in the last couple of years, have had an opportunity to play on the same field with those teams.
“If you remove that, if you remove any connection the Big 12 champion might have at competing at the highest level, we don't care. We're not going to watch football from the Upper Midwest or the Southeast. This is not how college football has ever been.
“And their misunderstanding of the very essential product that they're trying to buy, and then sell back to the public is stunning to me in its stupidity. This is not going to work. It might work for a while.
“But you guys are in the TV business and may be a little more familiar with these numbers because I think you probably get paid in the billions. That's my understanding. How in the hell — and I know the SEC is popular — but they're talking about $100 million-plus in revenue for each school and they're talking about getting to 20 schools if they can add some ACC programs. How is SEC football worth $2 billion a year to ESPN?
“I don't find the math adding up for myself. I just don't see it. I think it's really, they've screwed this up in their heads.”
That is the entire appeal. That and if I have a little league team to feed and want a menu with a billion things on it.Hickory Park ******* sucks and I will fight anyone that thinks its good.
Price to portions are the only thing good about it
This sums me up exactly. The only reason I watch non-ISU matchups is to see how it applies to potential future bowl match-ups and keeping tabs on the overall college football season since ISU is in the same overall league. You take ISU out of the big league College Football arrangement, I have 0% interest in the Big Ten and SEC. Yes I am just one person and that makes zero difference but I venture to guess a majority of college football fans are the same way. Nobody just casually watches college football, they watch because they are fans of a team. You cut off enough teams from the P2, you lose a significant viewership from non-P2 who won't pay for subscriptions, won't tune into national broadcasts on linear networks, and then those huge estimates don't pan out.
Im fine with elevating programs, but I hold them to the same deal as anyone else we're looking at. If they've earned it on the field, fit well, and add something to the conference(money or market) then im in.What is our obsession with elevating other programs?
Boise St
Memphis
Colorado State
New Mexico schools
San Diego St
We're fighting to stay relevant and we have fans that want to add programs that will take money out of our pockets.
Because Stanford is waiting for the Big 10 and Cal is the the 4th most popular PAC team in the state and sucks ass at both sports
I'd say their basketball summary is about the same as our football comparisons but flipped. And who the heck talks about NIT berths, most teams I know are embarrassed by them and won't mention them.You’re not necessarily wrong about Cal.
Summary of Cal’s last 20 football seasons:
1 x Conference Championship
4 x Top 25 final national rankings
1 x Top 10 final national ranking (#9)
7-4 record in bowl games
2 x 10 win seasons
1 x 9 win season
5 x 8 win seasons
128-115 overall record
You don’t want to compare this to ISU.
Summary of Cal’s last 20 basketball seasons:
8 x NCAA tournament berths (4 wins total)
4 x NIT tournament berths (4 wins total)
This compares a bit more favorably.
I know Iowa is pretty proud of their NIT national runner-up accomplishment a few years ago.I'd say their basketball summary is about the same as our football comparisons but flipped. And who the heck talks about NIT berths, most teams I know are embarrassed by them and won't mention them.
They hung the banner I'm sure.I know Iowa is pretty proud of their NIT national runner-up accomplishment a few years ago.
You’re not necessarily wrong about Cal.
Summary of Cal’s last 20 football seasons:
1 x Conference Championship
4 x Top 25 final national rankings
1 x Top 10 final national ranking (#9)
7-4 record in bowl games
2 x 10 win seasons
1 x 9 win season
5 x 8 win seasons
128-115 overall record
You don’t want to compare this to ISU.
Summary of Cal’s last 20 basketball seasons:
8 x NCAA tournament berths (4 wins total)
4 x NIT tournament berths (4 wins total)
This compares a bit more favorably.
I would say 7-10 years is about the length that is reasonable to go back. Over that and many peoples opinions and views change when they aren't blue bloods and neither ISU or Cal is a blue blood.Since 2010 Cal is 60-80 in football. I don’t know why we’re takings thing back to a 2006 PAC-10 championship to make that football program look accomplished.
This is the same BS that drives me nuts with Nebraska fans. What matters is where things stand today. Iowa State is currently in a much stronger position than Cal in both major sports.
Agree, fascinated by this stuff. The biggest deal I've found in my family tree is my 9th great-grandfather came over on the Mayflower and was a governor of Plymouth Colony. Also had a great-great grandfather who came over from Germany, was a farmer in northern Iowa until the age of 92, had a heart attack while feeding his pigs, it was later revealed that the name/identity he had been living with in America wasn't really his, it was his twin brother's, he had been accused of murdering a farmer outside their village in Germany so he took his brother's name and papers and fled to America. Someone else was later convicted of the murder but his whole life over here he lived under his twin brother's name and identity.My daughter, is a distant DNA match to Dale Earnhardt Jr. When I had her DNA done he showed up as a distant match, I remember a news story about him tracing his ancestry etc. when he showed up on hers I was shocked.
I have not found the connection/common Ancestor yet for them, but hope someday I will. A lot of records in Europe are slowly becoming more available, at least the ones that haven't been destroyed from all the wars.
I could go on forever about ancestry and history, and stories I have found. I probably should have a history degree really or something similar.
The obscure stuff, about the people really is interesting to me.
Like another one of my 2nd Great Grandfathers, killed himself, and the local paper headline read "Man Blew Head off with Shotgun, Driven Insane from Stomach Pain", and the account of the incident was detailed and unbelievable.
That same family had a real Hatfields and Macoys situation. The above mentioned's Cousin Shot his neighbor in a border dispute, but was acquitted of murder, as the killing was deemed Justified, as the neighbor had attacked first etc. And the story and investigation into that was very interesting too, considering both of these happened in the mid 1800's in Iowa.
Sorry I do truly love these details of history, and learning the intricacies of life and relationships in detail from years past. And I can ramble as I am sure many know on here.
Yeah, I get that. The NIT berths are just shorthand for “above average”I'd say their basketball summary is about the same as our football comparisons but flipped. And who the heck talks about NIT berths, most teams I know are embarrassed by them and won't mention them.
Oregon st and Washington st were 2 of the 6 PAC schools that were bowl eligible last year. Results aren't much of a factor.Since 2010 Cal is 60-80 in football. I don’t know why we’re takings thing back to a 2006 PAC-10 championship to make that football program look accomplished.
This is the same BS that drives me nuts with Nebraska fans. What matters is where things stand today. Iowa State is currently in a much stronger position than Cal in both major sports.