Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

FriendlySpartan

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2021
9,679
10,147
113
38

Amazing take down article
 

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,900
32,263
113
Parts Unknown

Amazing take down article

Kliavkoff could've been a sympathetic figure if he wasn't a boastful carny barker
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Acylum

Kinch

Well-Known Member
Sep 19, 2021
5,781
5,875
113
If I were Oregon (or Washington) I’d be broaching the subject of unequal revenue sharing at this point. They have nothing to lose by doing so now I would think.
If I were the Big 12 I would be pushing for this. Might be the tipping point for the four corners.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyclonepride

aeroclone

Well-Known Member
Oct 30, 2006
10,369
7,190
113
If I were Oregon (or Washington) I’d be broaching the subject of unequal revenue sharing at this point. They have nothing to lose by doing so now I would think.
Unless pushing this drives some of the 4 corners schools to jump and a B1G invite doesn't come. Then you are stuck in an even more depleted PAC.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CascadeClone

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,155
7,754
113
Dubuque
The Big10 has agreements with FOX, NBC and CBS as part of their existing deal for a 16 team conference.

If the Big10 would add Oregon, Washington or any other teams, where would those games be shown on linear TV? One of the Big10's existing partners would have to provide the linear timeslot. NBC Universal has USA and CBS has TBS/TNT.

Otherwise Oregon, Washington and the other 16 Big10 members are pushing the additional Big10 inventory to BTN, Peacock or Paramount+.

Big12 would seem to have a similar challenge in adding the corner 4. Obviously ESPN has a need for a late Saturday game, but would FOX after to a pro-rata and put a Big12 game or 2 on FOX. If FOX doesn't want more Big12 content, then that opens the door for Yormark to speak with Apple,.Amazon or a Big10 partner in NBC or CBS.
 

RustShack

Chiefs Dynasty
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jan 27, 2010
13,922
8,412
113
Overland Park
The Big10 has agreements with FOX, NBC and CBS as part of their existing deal for a 16 team conference.

If the Big10 would add Oregon, Washington or any other teams, where would those games be shown on linear TV? One of the Big10's existing partners would have to provide the linear timeslot. NBC Universal has USA and CBS has TBS/TNT.

Otherwise Oregon, Washington and the other 16 Big10 members are pushing 1 or 2 additional games BTN, Peacock or Paramount+.

Big12 would seem to have a similar challenge in adding the corner 4. Obviously ESPN has a need for a late Saturday game, but would FOX after to a pro-rata and put a Big12 game or 2 on FOX. If FOX doesn't want more Big12 content, then that opens the door for Yormark to speak with Apple,.Amazon or a Big10 partner in NBC or CBS.

Obviously these moves wouldn’t happen without approval from the media partners. Well it’s a go from ESPN, but yes Fox or someone else would have to agree.

Probably safe to assume Yormark has talked to them and knows where they stand.
 

Acylum

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2006
14,338
15,017
113

Amazing take down article
That was brutal.
 

AlaCyclone

Well-Known Member
Jun 14, 2007
5,590
6,792
113
Based on the current line-up -"Tournament of Champions",
looks like foodHD is making a bid for Pac Basketball!
/ sarcasm
 

MugNight

Well-Known Member
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Jul 27, 2021
2,243
4,101
113
News that the PAC-12 deputy commissioner is leaving the conference:


To be fair, the above could be completely unrelated to current events- just mentioning as it’s noteworthy.

Interesting that his first assignment is to consult with the PAC 12. Probably making more money in this new gig. Feels like a grift to me.
 

isucy86

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2006
9,155
7,754
113
Dubuque
Interesting that his first assignment is to consult with the PAC 12. Probably making more money in this new gig. Feels like a grift to me.
Would agree 100% the timing is interesting. Even if he continues to consult, usually not great to lose long-term employees at a crucial time during negotiations.

He's been around the Pac12 longer than GK, so maybe they are on different pages. Afterall, this guy was with Larry Scott when they launched Pac12 Network. Maybe GK feels they need a different perspective or area of expertise or relationships to get a deal Pac12 Presidents can live with.
 

KnappShack

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2008
23,900
32,263
113
Parts Unknown
Would agree 100% the timing is interesting. Even if he continues to consult, usually not great to lose long-term employees at a crucial time during negotiations.

He's been around the Pac12 longer than GK, so maybe they are on different pages. Afterall, this guy was with Larry Scott when they launched Pac12 Network. Maybe GK feels they need a different perspective or area of expertise or relationships to get a deal Pac12 Presidents can live with.

The PAC 12 Network.

The New Coke of College Sports
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Gorm

SEIOWA CLONE

Well-Known Member
Dec 19, 2018
6,793
6,989
113
63
Two weeks ago, a new TV deal was going to be released in the next few days to a week, now it again been postponed until late spring to early summer. The 4 corner schools have to be wondering, what the hold up is now?

If the Pac12 had a truly great deal on the table, they would have announced it, the schools have got to be feeling that there is no deal out there that is close to what the B12 already has in hand, and the commish is trying to buy some time before he is forced to tell the schools the truth.

Hoping for a miracle and getting one is two totally different things.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cyclonepride

Gunnerclone

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2010
75,682
80,066
113
DSM
Two weeks ago, a new TV deal was going to be released in the next few days to a week, now it again been postponed until late spring to early summer. The 4 corner schools have to be wondering, what the hold up is now?

If the Pac12 had a truly great deal on the table, they would have announced it, the schools have got to be feeling that there is no deal out there that is close to what the B12 already has in hand, and the commish is trying to buy some time before he is forced to tell the schools the truth.

Hoping for a miracle and getting one is two totally different things.

I really get a kick out of how the PAC-12 butt lickers are pointing to these statements by so and so AD and so and so President like it means something. That’s why they hate us Big 12 people because THEY KNOW THAT WE KNOW BECAUSE WE’VE BEEN THROUGH THIS 3 TIMES.
 

Clonehomer

Well-Known Member
Apr 11, 2006
26,856
24,984
113
The PAC 12 Network.

The New Coke of College Sports

Not at all a fair comparison. Before New Coke, Coco-cola had a popular product that people liked. Releasing New Coke made them angry that they ruined it. The PAC never really had a product that people really wanted. So the PACN has been more about apathy than anger.

To me, it's more like Coco-cola Starlight. Coke released it and everyone collectively asked, why? It's something that maybe you'd try once to see what it's about, but it was never anything that you'd go back to over and over again. Eventually it went away and no one really noticed.