Hmmm.... temors coming from the ACC big dogs. Perhaps the Big 12 should consider taking only a couple of PAC teams for now so they can have space to add a few ACC teams in the future?
Cunningham has been pretty vocal about the ACC's dilemma. As far back as last summer he was pushing an ACC/Pac10 merger after USC/UCLA bolted. My guess is he hoped it would open up ESPN's deal with the ACC or bring in another media partner willing to pay 2025 prices.
At some point, I feel Fox & ESPN are going to come to the conclusion chaos isn't constructive for the next decade and work with Big10, SEC, Big12, ACC and maybe Pac12 to divide up teams into a P3.
People focus on ESPN being in the catbird seat with the ACC, but with the growth of streaming there could become a time when the ACCN becomes a money pit. Currently ESPN pays the ACC around $250M annually and committed to operating costs of ACCN. The SEC could add 4 elite ACC teams and ESPN could increase its SEC deal by $250M. Last year the Disney deal with the ACC was 33 games on ABC (15), ESPN (10), and ESPN2/U (8). The rest (70ish) on ACCN.
Same goes for FOX & Big10. The big question for the Big10 is do they prefer more of a western presence (AAU schools like Stanford, Cal, UU, UA or CU) or more of a southeast focus (UNC, UVA, Duke, GaTech). Assuming ND joins the Big10 and maybe has influence if its partner is Stanford or BC.
The Big12 would have pick of the rest.
Last edited: