Paul Rhoads and Recruiting

It's called not doing the conventional crap that everyone else does. Looking for diamonds where no one else is looking. Taking some chances.

Why don't we onside kick it every time? Go for it every fourth down? Like you said, we have no tradition, no history. What then do we have to lose?
Im drunk, and you're an idiot.
 
Im drunk, and you're an idiot.

You're right. Never mind that it's statistically superior to go for it every time. We should keep doing what we're doing. Keep incorporating zero creativity or wrinkles into our generic, predictable coaching schemes. Keep trying to beat Texas and Oklahoma at their own game the conventional way with worse players and less resources. It has worked so great for us the last 100 years.
 
Last edited:
I made a post a few months ago about Rhoads and a bunch of you thought I was a troll, but yesterday is a perfect example. Rhoads doesn't recruit nearly well enough for us to be able to be a decent team. I know the team is very young, but under NO circumstance should we be getting beat up by 1-AA players. Our guys are weak, slow, can't tackle, and a hundred other things I could say. Sorry, but this whole recruiting "projects" thing is going to kill us this season. Even though stars and rankings don't mean everything, signing 2-star guys that can't tackle makes us look foolish now. Getting Lazard is great (if he decides to stick around after our nightmare season), but it won't do any good with a weak offensive line that can't protect Richardson. Messingham is also terrible.

I want to be optimistic, but I can't be after last nights game. It's time for us to get a better recruiter. Whether that requires an assistant or a new head coach, whatever it will take. Heck, schools like Illinois and Indiana can out recruit us. We are in a big conference. It's not hard to sign more physical players that won't get embarrassed by UNI.

I hope I'm proven wrong this season, but it's hard to be optimistic when UNI isn't even a top 10 team in 1-AA.

Go Cyclones, and please prove me wrong and turn the season around.

You know what, the more I think about it the more I agree with you. I don't understand why Rhoads isn't signing 4 & 5-star guys. Seems like they would be better players than 2-star guys. I wonder if he has thought about that. Maybe you should call in to the coaches show and suggest it. Man, you are a genius. I bet you rock all the nerds at chess club, huh? Can we hang out sometime?
 
I'm convinced. We have the dumbest fan base in college football. Reading through this thread just cements it. Goodness.
 
You know what, the more I think about it the more I agree with you. I don't understand why Rhoads isn't signing 4 & 5-star guys. Seems like they would be better players than 2-star guys. I wonder if he has thought about that. Maybe you should call in to the coaches show and suggest it. Man, you are a genius. I bet you rock all the nerds at chess club, huh? Can we hang out sometime?

Hahaha!!! Nice!!! Makes ya wonder if he was really interested in Lazard, or if Lazard's dad begged CPR to offer him a scholarship!!
 
Crazy is the football landscape... visited lincoln ne today, wow. it's an arms race and we are losing.
 
Crazy is the football landscape... visited lincoln ne today, wow. it's an arms race and we are losing.

Considering kNU has tradition and some championships behind them, I would disagree. We beat them our last time in Lincoln and was a botched fake xp attempt from beating them last time in Ames as well. Wyoming nearly upset them last night..
 
No kidding, genius. You are not a troll, just dumb.

Bottom line, complaining about recruiting at Iowa state is stupid. It is one of the hardest jobs in college football. The weather works against us. Small natural talent base. Local competitor (with better tradition) with whom we have to compete. Recruiting will ALWAYS be difficult here. Who do you think we are? Seriously, who? We have no tradition, crappy weather, are a million miles away from places that do have talent. Who do you expect we will get???

If Paul Rhoads can't sell it, it can't be sold. The sooner you get that through your thick head, the better. This isn't about accepting mediocrity or a defeatist attitude. It is freaking reality, slapping you upside the head. You can whine and wish all you want, but we aren't getting upper level recruits to come here on a regular basis. Iowa can't do that and they have three top-8 finishes in the BCS.

None of those guys at UNI had high-major offers, or they wouldn't be at UNI. We will ALWAYS have to take risks on guys. We will ALWAYS have to look for diamonds. That is the way it is.

******** about recruiting is lazy because it is easy. Check out emaw after the k-state loss. They were complaining about Snyder and his recruiting. Look at WVU's site after their win. Complaining about their recruiting. And you know what? Recruiting to either is easier than to ISU. So shut up already. Some times you win, sometimes you lose. And if you are ISU, you end up on one side more than another. If you can't accept it, get the **** out of here. I am so tired of this crap. Rhoads will coach up the ones we have. Will we win them all? No. But it is the best we got. Sack up or ship out. Good riddance to all of you "wah, wah , recruiting sucks, *******."

Sorry. End of my rant.


No man, I'm actually sorry your rant ended. Well put my friend.
 
Part of the problem is we've overlooked players who are right under our nose that UNI builds into good teams. If you go back 4 years you could find posts by several of us wondering why on earth we weren't offering David Johnson a scholarship. Here was a 6-3 190 lb gazelle that could have been a Big 10 or Big 12 running back, receiver or safety, and maybe all conference at any of the 3 positions. Iowa blew it too as they wanted him to walk on as we did. I know UNI was solid all over the field but who do you think wins that game last night if #7 was wearing red instead of purple? Very frustrating.
LOL. David Johnson would look worse than Jeff Woody if he was on ISU. Wimberley is better than Johnson, but you'll never know that because Messingham is trash.
 
A lot of people here are blowing up what I said way out of proportion and calling me stupid. I know we aren't going to be able to get a top ten recruiting class ever. However, what the hell does Indiana offer in terms of tradition? Nothing at all. Last year they still signed four 4-star recruits. I can't even remember the last time Indiana won a bowl game. We should be able to beat Indiana every single year. If you still think I'm wrong, you are the biggest homer there is. Recruiting could get better for ISU with a hire or two as assistants.
 
A lot of people here are blowing up what I said way out of proportion and calling me stupid. I know we aren't going to be able to get a top ten recruiting class ever. However, what the hell does Indiana offer in terms of tradition? Nothing at all. Last year they still signed four 4-star recruits. I can't even remember the last time Indiana won a bowl game. We should be able to beat Indiana every single year. If you still think I'm wrong, you are the biggest homer there is. Recruiting could get better for ISU with a hire or two as assistants.

Okay, Junior. It isn't that easy. You are either stupid or lazy. I have my guess but you tell me which.

2014:
State of Indiana 6 4-star
State of Iowa 2 4-star (one we have committed, the other to Alabama)

2013:
State of Indiana 1 5-star, 6 4-star
State of Iowa 1 4-star (who we have redshirting)

2012:
State of Indiana 2 5-star, 1 4-star
State of Iowa 1 4-star (signed at Michigan, we signed highest 3-star)

2011:
State of Indiana 1 5-star, 2 4-star
State of Iowa 0 4-star

2010:
State of Indiana 1 5-star, 4 4-star
State of Iowa 0 4-star

So more local talent available. Now go find a map. See the state of Indiana? Now look at state with which Indiana shares a border. What do you see? Ohio. Michigan. And those states produce a lot more football talent than Minnesota or Nebraska (Illinois is a push because it borders both Indiana and Iowa). So it is closer to talent-rich areas. And we don't even have much exposure in the states we border (because they aren't in our conference anymore) so recruiting is automatically harder in our border states.

So don't come in here and tell me that it is an apples-to-apples comparison. Because it isn't. THAT is why people (specifically me) are saying you are stupid.

(I am ignoring your homer statement because it doesn't make any sense. If I don't think we should beat Indiana in recruiting every year makes me a homer? Ummm. Not sure you know what a homer is.)
 
You know what, the more I think about it the more I agree with you. I don't understand why Rhoads isn't signing 4 & 5-star guys. Seems like they would be better players than 2-star guys. I wonder if he has thought about that.
UNI had "5 star" players in terms of passion and effort. That either comes from within, or Farley instills it. We've had two mail-it-in games in a row - Tulsa and now this. Did you watch the game?
 
UNI had "5 star" players in terms of passion and effort. That either comes from within, or Farley instills it. We've had two mail-it-in games in a row - Tulsa and now this. Did you watch the game?

I did. We got punched in the face. But it is pretty easy for a team to overlook a I-AA opponent. And it is easy for a I-AA opponent to get up for playing a I-A team. And I think we have a shown a pattern of coming out flat from time-to-time. That is an issue.

My comment was a reply to his. He said that recruiting projects isn't working and insinuates that we need to recruit players with more stars. Well, no crap Captain Obvious. If we could, we would. To rip on recruiting is lazy and ignorant.
 
I did. We got punched in the face. But it is pretty easy for a team to overlook a I-AA opponent. And it is easy for a I-AA opponent to get up for playing a I-A team. And I think we have a shown a pattern of coming out flat from time-to-time. That is an issue.

My comment was a reply to his. He said that recruiting projects isn't working and insinuates that we need to recruit players with more stars. Well, no crap Captain Obvious. If we could, we would. To rip on recruiting is lazy and ignorant.

Just because people have different opinions from you doesn't mean they are lazy,crazy or ignorant. Without differing opinions message boards would be boring.
 
Last edited:
Just because people have different opinions from you doesn't mean they are lazy,crazy or ignorant. Without differing opinions message boards would be boring.
That's his point. Stating that we would be better if our recruiting was better is a 'no ****' kind of statement that everyone already knows.
 
Just because people have different opinions from you doesn't mean they are crazy or ignorant

What opinion? That we need to recruit better? Everyone wants us to recruit better. Me included. But to rip on it is stupid. We are recruiting as well as we can. Look at the numbers I quoted above in the comparison between Iowa and Indiana. We are pulling in the higher rated recruits in our state. But our state doesn't produce many highly ranked recruits.

The facts are that we live in a talent-poor area. We have to travel a great distance to get players. But so does Nebraska. But they have tradition to sell to recruits. What do we have to sell? What is our selling point to woo some hotshot 4-star who isn't from Iowa? <crickets>

We have won three bowl games in our history. Three! We have two conference championships (from 100 years ago) and finished in the AP top-25 twice. We don't have mountains, we don't have beaches, we don't have great weather, we don't have a thriving metropolis. We have... corn. Cripes, our state gets confused with Idaho/Ohio on a regular basis by adults. What about 18-year-old kids?

The fact is that recruiting will always be an issue for Iowa State. So quit complaining about it. Its the low-hanging fruit. Its like picking on the fat kid at recess. That is why I am making this thread my *****.
 
What opinion? That we need to recruit better? Everyone wants us to recruit better. Me included. But to rip on it is stupid. We are recruiting as well as we can. Look at the numbers I quoted above in the comparison between Iowa and Indiana. We are pulling in the higher rated recruits in our state. But our state doesn't produce many highly ranked recruits.

The facts are that we live in a talent-poor area. We have to travel a great distance to get players. But so does Nebraska. But they have tradition to sell to recruits. What do we have to sell? What is our selling point to woo some hotshot 4-star who isn't from Iowa? <crickets>

We have won three bowl games in our history. Three! We have two conference championships (from 100 years ago) and finished in the AP top-25 twice. We don't have mountains, we don't have beaches, we don't have great weather, we don't have a thriving metropolis. We have... corn. Cripes, our state gets confused with Idaho/Ohio on a regular basis by adults. What about 18-year-old kids?

The fact is that recruiting will always be an issue for Iowa State. So quit complaining about it. Its the low-hanging fruit. Its like picking on the fat kid at recess. That is why I am making this thread my *****.
Can we then on the flip side of this not pretend like every unranked tom and **** is the next jake knott.
 
Can we then on the flip side of this not pretend like every unranked tom and **** is the next jake knott.

Yeah, because the last two guys who had no profiles when they committed were Dondre Daley and Nigel Tribune--and we all know how much a waste of talent THEY turned out to be!

(Do I really need a jimlad?)

I can't believe that some people are still complaining about CPR signing two star players. I have a question for you.Do you consider Oklahoma State, or K-State, to have had more success on the field than we do, to have had more national publicity than we have?

Here are their current reciting classes:

Yahoo Sports: Rivals.com 2014 Oklahoma St. Commitments

Yahoo Sports: Rivals.com 2014 Kansas St. Commitments

OSU currently has eight two-star players committed, KSU has seven. I didn't check any further in the confertence. What, do you think that CPR is going to wave a magic wand, and suddenly start signing all three, four and five star talents? Not gonna happen...
 
We lost Farniok but that was it. That was a pretty big loss though I will admit. Watson will help some I think but probably won't make much of a difference considering how bad our front 7 really is.

A Bad Front 7 = A losing football season?
 
Yeah, because the last two guys who had no profiles when they committed were Dondre Daley and Nigel Tribune--and we all know how much a waste of talent THEY turned out to be!

(Do I really need a jimlad?)

I can't believe that some people are still complaining about CPR signing two star players. I have a question for you.Do you consider Oklahoma State, or K-State, to have had more success on the field than we do, to have had more national publicity than we have?

Here are their current reciting classes:

Yahoo Sports: Rivals.com 2014 Oklahoma St. Commitments

Yahoo Sports: Rivals.com 2014 Kansas St. Commitments

OSU currently has eight two-star players committed, KSU has seven. I didn't check any further in the confertence. What, do you think that CPR is going to wave a magic wand, and suddenly start signing all three, four and five star talents? Not gonna happen...

Yes, people actually believe that. Also Chizik was a better recruiter than Rhoads! :smile: