*** Official Selection Sunday Thread ***

Cycsk

Year-round tailgater
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 17, 2009
28,320
17,183
113
Is it as simple as picked the four #1's and then assigning them according to what makes sense geographically? And then again with the #2's, #3's and #4's?

Surely, there are all sorts of caveats. I hear the committee spokesperson make reference to variables, but do they publish the list of variables and the weight each carries in placement?

If the criteria are clearly defined, you don't need a committee for anything other than ranking the teams.
 

RING4CY

Well-Known Member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2010
8,895
2,047
113
Ames, IA
Is it as simple as picked the four #1's and then assigning them according to what makes sense geographically? And then again with the #2's, #3's and #4's?

Surely, there are all sorts of caveats. I hear the committee spokesperson make reference to variables, but do they publish the list of variables and the weight each carries in placement?

If the criteria are clearly defined, you don't need a committee for anything other than ranking the teams.
Don't know if this answers your questions directly, but some reading for your Sunday leisure.

 

RING4CY

Well-Known Member
Bookie
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Mar 20, 2010
8,895
2,047
113
Ames, IA
Just a general reminder that TV times and channels for matchups won’t be figured until later tonight.
I swear I forget this every year.

The only thing we'll know right away when the bracket is announced is days.

Wichita and Denver are Thursday/Saturday. Milwaukee is Friday/Sunday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isufbcurt

Cycsk

Year-round tailgater
SuperFanatic
SuperFanatic T2
Aug 17, 2009
28,320
17,183
113
Don't know if this answers your questions directly, but some reading for your Sunday leisure.


Interesting. I should have known that you would have a link to something like this.

As you might expect, these videos raise a few questions. For instance, what criteria is to be used for picking the top 8 (or top 4 teams) or scrubbing one team down a notch? The video refers only to "best" and "better" teams. Is it left to the committee members to determine their own criteria? Is it "best" at the moment? Or "best" for the season? Do they consider injuries, both early in the season and currently?

For instance, it still baffles my mind that a committee member could think that our non-conference schedule last year was more determinative of our quality as a team than our performance in the Big 12 tournament. The non-conference schedule is nearly irrelevant. You could have the worst non-conference schedule and lose every game, but then win every game in your conference and conference tournament by 40 points. Do you dock the team because it lost bad non-conference games in November? Or honor the team because it had great wins in January/February/March? I know what Vegas would say. But based on the logic explained last year, the committee might treat the bad non-conference losses as meaningful.
 

clone37

Well-Known Member
Oct 9, 2010
243
515
93
I never understood complaining about our draw. It's the NCAA tourny, you think it should be a cake walk? You want to make the final 4 you're going to have to beat 2-3 really good teams, no matter your seed, or draw.
Exactly. The only thing that I will say is certain years when Round 1&2 are very close by like Omaha, KC, etc, that can certainly make a difference with huge home crowds. But this year with Milwaukee, Denver, whatever, it really doesn't make a difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Letterkenny